May 15, 2020 | Agendas, Events, News
Kazakhstan National University (KazNU) Human Rights Institute in cooperation with the ICJ, the European Association of Lawyers and other partners will hold an online international conference “Law and human rights during the pandemic”.
The event will assemble leading legal experts and practitioners from Central Asia and other countries who will discuss the most pertinent issues for ensuring human rights and access to justice in times of pandemic.
The topics will include sections on human rights during quarantine and emergency situations, and administration of justice during the pandemic.
The event is open for participation upon online registration.
The working language of the event is Russian. The conference will start at 11.00 Nur-Sultan time (GMT +5).
Links
Website of the conference
Agenda in Russian
Agenda in English
May 15, 2020 | Новости, Событие
Институт по правам человека при Казахстанском национальном университете (КазНУ) совместно с Международной комиссией юристов, Европейской ассоциацией адвокатов и другими партнерами проведут онлайн-конференцию «Закон и права человека в условиях пандемии».
В мероприятии примут участие ведущие правовые эксперты и практикующие юристы из Центральной Азии и других стран, которые обсудят наиболее актуальные вопросы, связанные с обеспечением прав человека и доступа к правосудию в условиях пандемии.
Будут рассматриваться такие темы, как права человека во время карантина и чрезвычайного положения, а также отправление правосудия в условиях пандемии.
Чтобы принять участие в мероприятии, нужно пройти онлайн-регистрацию. [HYPERLINK] https://lawyerswebinar.bitrix24.site/?fbclid=IwAR11jXC1yWY54y-JEpAf6F2pQVVbu0ykJG68ygkYRoJIJ20XWP9jcTj-fP4#block371
Рабочим языком конференции является русский. Конференция начнется в 11:00 по Нур-Султану (GMT +5).
Вебсайт конференции: https://lawyerswebinar.bitrix24.site/?fbclid=IwAR11jXC1yWY54y-JEpAf6F2pQVVbu0ykJG68ygkYRoJIJ20XWP9jcTj-fP4#
Программа на русском языке
May 8, 2020 | News
The ICJ today denounced the decision on 5 May 2020 by the Philippines’ National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) to issue an order to ABS CBN Corporation, one of the leading media outlets in the country, to cease its on-air operations.
The ICJ asserted that the action against ABS CBN violates the right to freedom of opinion and expression, which includes the rights of the media to operate without censorship or restraint and the public’s right to access information. This right is guaranteed under Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Poliitical Rights (ICCPR). The Philippines is a State Party to the ICCPR.
“A free and unhindered media is essential in any society to ensure freedom of opinion and expression and other human rights. It is one of the cornerstones of a democratic society,” said Emerlynne Gil, ICJ’s Senior International Legal Adviser.
The NTC’s basis for issuing the order is that ABS CBN’s legislative franchise has expired on 4 May 2020 and action has yet to be taken on its renewal by the House of Representatives. The ICJ fears that the reasons for this delay may be politically motivated.
Given the stakes for freedom of expression, the ICJ urges NTC to follow its own precedents whereby it has allowed broadcast and telecommunications companies to operate beyond their franchise expiry dates, pending the renewal.
“Limitations imposed on the right to freedom of opinion and expression have to pass the general tests, including that of necessity and proportionality, which do not appear to have been met here,” Gil added.
The action taken against ABS CBN is part of a pattern of harassment of independent media by governmental authorities in the Philippines. President Rodrigo Duterte has, in the past, expressed resentment towards ABS CBN for allegedly refusing to air his political ads when he ran for office in 2016. The network is also known to have aired views critical of his administration’s murderous ‘war on drugs’.
In December 2019, President Duterte said that he would make sure that ABS CBN’s franchise would not be renewed. This is not the first time that he has sought to silence a media outlet critical of his administration.
There are at least 11 bills seeking the renewal of the franchise currently pending at the House of Representatives, with the earliest filed in July 2019.
“It is taking the House of Representatives an inordinately long period of time to approve the renewal of ABS CBN’s franchise,” said Gil. “It appears that the allies of this administration in the House are holding the franchise renewal like a sword over ABS CBN’s head to chill it from airing critical views about the government.”
The UN Human Rights Committee, the ICCPR’s supervisory body, has said that States must avoid imposing onerous licensing conditions on broadcast media, and that the criteria for the application of these conditions should be reasonable, objective, clear, transparent, and non-discriminatory.
This action against ABS CBN comes in the middle of the state of public health emergency in the Philippines when access to information is vital in the country’s response to the COVID-19 crisis. The ICJ had earlier raised its concerns on abuses occurring during the lockdown in the Philippines.
The ICJ calls on the Philippine government to uphold and respect freedom of opinion and expression, and ensure that a free press can operate without censorship or restraint.
The ICJ also reminds the government that the public’s access to information is vital to ensure public health and safety during the COVID-19 crisis.
Contact
Emerlynne Gil, Senior International Legal Adviser, t: +662 619 8477 (ext. 206) or e: emerlynne.gil(a)icj.org
May 6, 2020 | Comunicados de prensa, Noticias
La Comisión Internacional de Juristas apoyó la realización de una serie de conversatorios online acerca de los desafíos que enfrentan los sistemas de justicia latinoamericanos en el marco de la emergencia generada por la pandemia.
Estos conversatorios abordaron temas diversos, como los servicios esenciales de justicia, el impacto del teletrabajo en la judicatura, la innovación en la justicia en tiempos de emergencia, la búsqueda de las personas desaparecidas, la situación de personas migrantes y el uso del litigio estratégico como herramienta de defensa de derechos fundamentales.
Esta iniciativa fue organizada por un grupo de mujeres de América Latina que trabajan en temas de justicia en la región, y fue apoyada por la Fundación para el Debido Proceso Legal (DPLF), la Fundación Construir, la Fundación Tribuna Constitucional, el Observatorio de Derechos y Justicia, y la Fundación para la Justicia y el Estado Democrático del Derecho.
Los videos de las sesiones que se realizaron están disponibles en español en los siguientes enlaces:
Conversatorio 1: Servicios esenciales de justicia en tiempos de emergencia
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEW-GJ9J0Po
Conversatorio 2: Teletrabajo y la Judicatura: Juezas en la primera línea de la justicia
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pn7h41pGfp8&feature=youtu.be
Conversatorio 3: Innovando en la justicia en tiempos de emergencia
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZ-2y9Ir_RE&feature=youtu.be
Conversatorio 4: La búsqueda de personas desaparecidas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rfWj_gjxJbs&feature=youtu.be
Conversatorio 5: La protección de las personas migrantes
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6kDOjklinnw&feature=youtu.be
Conversatorio 6: ¿Como puede el litigio estratégico protegernos frente a los efectos de la pandemia?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlwcZqq2CJ4&feature=youtu.be
Conversatorio 7: Experiencias nacionales de litigio estratégico frente al COVID-19
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qd-J5pcEX7I&feature=youtu.be
Texto completo, en PDF: Videos-Sistemas-de-Justice-Press-Release-2020-SPA
May 6, 2020 | Advocacy, News, Publications
In a report published today, the ICJ called on the police and prosecutorial authorities in Myanmar to re-open the investigation into the death of journalist Ko Par Gyi in military custody in September 2014.
The report documented the many barriers that have prevented justice from being served in this case, as well as other cases of gross human rights violations in Myanmar.
The ICJ called on the Union Parliament to repeal or amend the 1959 Defence Services Act and other legislation that effectively provides immunity to military personnel accused of serious crimes. These and other barriers have been described at length in the ICJ’s 2018 report on Achieving Justice for Gross Human Rights Violations.
“More than three years ago, the police abruptly ended their formal inquiry into the killing of Ko Par Gyi, without providing any justifiable legal rationale for its closure,” said Frederick Rawski, ICJ Asia Pacific Director. “In the intervening years, we have seen what happens when this culture of military impunity goes unaddressed.”
In the report, An unlawful killing: How Ko Par Gyi’s death highlights barriers to justice in Myanmar, the ICJ evaluated the various investigations into the death and identified three key obstacles to justice in the case:
- the existence and operation of national laws like the 1959 Defence Services Act that shield security forces from public criminal prosecutions, serving to deny victims and their families the right to truth about violations;
- sub-standard investigative practices that are vulnerable to political pressure and lacked independence, and simultaneous, separate and uncoordinated investigations that resulted in an unsystematic and ineffective approach to investigating the case; and
- a lack of transparency that denied the family their right to access information concerning the violations and accountability processes.
Ko Par Gyi was detained by police in Mon State and transferred to military detention on 30 September 2014. He died four days later in military custody. A deeply flawed inquiry carried out in military courts, pursuant to the 1959 Defence Services Act, resulted in the acquittal of the soldiers allegedly involved. Those same provisions are commonly used to transfer cases involving military personnel from civilian to military court. Under international standards, military courts should not be used to try military personnel or others for gross human rights violations and crimes under international law.
“It is no surprise that an international investigative mechanism has been established to look into alleged serious human rights violations in Rakhine and elsewhere in Myanmar,” said Rawski. “Myanmar’s legal framework does not provide adequate safeguards to ensure independent investigation into and prosecution of serious human rights violations. What happened to Ko Par Gyi’s case illustrates that all too clearly.”
The UN Human Rights Council has established an Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar (IIMM) to collect evidence and prepare files for criminal prosecution of the most serious international crimes and violations of international law committed in Myanmar since 2011.
Key recommendations in the report include:
- To the Executive and the Union Parliament: amend the 1959 Defense Services Act to align it with democratic principles, the constitutional guarantee of equal legal protection, and the State’s international law obligation to protect the right to life, including by prosecuting serious violations.
- To the Tatmadaw: apply standards and procedures in military courts that conform to international law, ensure all crimes perpetrated against civilians are tried in the civilian judicial system, and reform rules of engagement to explicitly instruct soldiers to protect life, consistent with international law.
- To the Myanmar Police Force and the Union Attorney General’s Office: align investigative procedures and practices with international law and standards.
- To the Myanmar National Human Rights Commission: take an active and broad interpretation of the MNHRC mandate to address serious human rights violations including those which have gone before courts.
- To UN Member States and international organizations: ensure any organizational support to security forces is contingent on and enables demonstrable commitments to prevent and punish violations by its members.
This report was produced as part of the ICJ’s Global Accountability Initiative, which aims at combatting impunity and promoting redress for gross human rights violations around the world through the entrenchment of the rule of law
Download
An unlawful killing: How Ko Par Gyi’s death highlights barriers to justice in Myanmar in English and Burmese.
Press statement with additional background information on Ko Par Gyi in English and Burmese.
Contact:
Frederick Rawski, ICJ Asia Pacific Regional Director, (Bangkok), t:+66 64 4781121, e: frederick.rawski@icj.org
Kingsley Abbott, Coordinator of the ICJ’s Global Accountability Initiative, t: +66 94 470 1345; e: kingsley.abbott(a)icj.org