Tajikistan: ICJ concerned at arrest of lawyer

Tajikistan: ICJ concerned at arrest of lawyer

The ICJ is alarmed at the arrest of Buzurgmehr Yorov, a lawyer practicing in Tajikistan. 

Mr Yorov’s arrest may be related to his representation of thirteen leaders of the Islamic Renaissance Party of Tajikistan (IRPT).

This is the third recent case of arrest of a lawyer in Tajikistan, and this pattern of arrests raises serious concerns for protection of human rights and compliance with international standards on the role of lawyers.

On 28 September, at 10.00, police officers appeared at the “Sipar” Collegia of lawyers, which is headed by Buzurgmehr Yorov, and seized documents related to the case of the members of the IRPT who Mr Yorov represents. At around 14.00, other police officers apprehended the lawyer at his office, claiming he needed to answer certain questions. The lawyer later made a phone call to say that he had been arrested and detained.

On 29 September, the Ministry of Interior of Tajikistan, in its Press Release, said that Buzurgmehr Yorov “by way of fraud” appropriated “a large amount of money”.

According to the Ministry of the Interior, a resident of Istaravshan named Komiljhon Bozorov paid USD 4000 to help with the case of his son, who was charged with an attempted murder. Mr Bozorov is reported to claim that the lawyer failed to provide legal aid and “abused his trust and his difficult situation”.

Mr Yorov is also charged with forging documents about the technical condition of a car.

The ICJ fears that the decision to arrest lawyer Buzurgmehr Yorov was in fact connected with his representation of members of the IRPT.

The ICJ recalls that according to the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers, “Lawyers shall not be identified with their clients or their clients’ causes as a result of discharging their functions”; they must be able “to perform all their profession functions without intimidation, hindrance, harassment or improper interference”; and lawyers “shall not suffer, or be threatened with, prosecution or administrative, economic or other sanctions for any action taken in accordance with recognized professional duties, standards or ethics”.

The ICJ’s concerns in this case are based in part on the particularly worrying pattern of arrests of lawyers , who represent clients in “high profile” cases, that has emerged in the recent past in the Republic of Tajikistan.

It should be recalled that it is lawyers’ role to defend persons charged with alleged crimes. The justice system cannot function in accordance with international standards if lawyers are not able to represent their clients’ interests.

For the right to a fair trial as guaranteed under international human rights law to be protected, defendants must have access to a lawyer who can represent their interests effectively, without harassment or interference.

The ICJ calls on the authorities of Tajikistan to ensure that all lawyers are able to conduct their work without fear of threats or harassment, including arbitrary arrest or prosecution.

It calls on the investigating authorities to ensure that Burzurgmehr Yorov is not prosecuted as a means of harassment or reprisal for his representation of a client, and that any proceedings against him are conducted in accordance with international human rights law, including the right to a fair hearing, and taking into account international standards on the role of lawyers.

Whether or not his arrest is in reality based on his representation of IRPT, or on the basis of the allegations of fraud, Mr Yorov should be immediately released.

Even if the arrest was in fact based on the allegations of fraud, the ICJ is unaware of any evidence or reasons in Mr Yorov’s case that would justify his continued pre-trial detention, under international standards on the right to liberty and the prohibition of arbitrary arrest and detention.

Background information:

Thirteen persons, represented by Burzurgmehr Yorov, were arrested on 16-17 September 2015, following armed attacks earlier this year in Dushanbe and Vakhdat.

Members of the group are accused of “establishment of a criminal community/organization in order to commit grave or particularly grave crimes”, as foreseen under Article 187(1) of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Tajikistan.

The arrest and detention of Mr Yorov is the third case in the last two years of prosecution of a lawyer representing clients in a high profile case in Tajikistan. On 13 January 2015, lawyer Shukhrat Kudratov was convicted to 9 years in prison on charges of fraud and bribery.

In 2014, another lawyer, Fakhriddin Zokirov, was arrested and tried on charges of fraud in banking transactions. He was released as a part of an act of amnesty in November 2014.

Tajikistan-Lawyer Yorov statement-News-web stories-2015-RUS (full text in Russian, PDF)

For further infromation see previous ICJ statements:

Tajikistan: ICJ concerned at conviction of lawyer Shukhrat Kudratov

Tajikistan: Arrest of lawzer is a threat to the independence of the profession

 

ICJ Mission on the legal profession to the Kyrgyz Republic

ICJ Mission on the legal profession to the Kyrgyz Republic

Today, the ICJ has started its mission to the Kyrgyz Republic on organisation and functioning of the legal profession.

During the mission, which will last from 21 to 25 September, the ICJ will assess the implementation of the new legislation unifying the legal profession under a single national bar association, including establishment of new structures and standards for the self-governance of the profession regarding qualification, disciplinary action and professional ethics.

A round table with independent lawyers will be held during the visit, other meetings with bodies of the Bar Association, State officials and other stakeholders that take part in the reform will be held.

The mission will include Jeroen Brouwer, former President of the Dutch Bar Association,  Róisín Pillay, Director of the Europe Programme and Temur Shakirov, Legal Adviser of the Europe Programme.

The mission will be followed by a brief report with recommendations for reform.

Contact:

Róisín Pillay: roisin.pillay(a)icj.org

Temur Shakirov: temur.shakirov(a)icj.org

 

Human Rights Council: ICJ oral statement during the Interactive Dialogue with the Commission of Inquiry on Syria

Human Rights Council: ICJ oral statement during the Interactive Dialogue with the Commission of Inquiry on Syria

The ICJ today delivered an oral statement at the UN Human Rights Council during the Interactive Dialogue with the Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic concerning accountability and other measures to address the Syrian conflict.

In the statement the ICJ called upon the UN Human Rights Council and the Security Council to respond to the findings of the 10th report of the Syria Commission of Inquiry, including with a view to ensuring accountability for the serious violations of international law.

The ICJ also called upon all states to comply with their obligations under international law vis-à-vis the Syrian conflict, including by searching for all those responsible for international crimes committed in this conflict and bringing them before their own courts, and by protecting the rights of Syrian refugees and abiding by the principle of non-refoulement.

The full statement may be downloaded in PDF format, here: Syria-UN-HRC30-OralStatement-Advocay-non legal submission-2015-ENG

 

ICJ and Thai Lawyers for Human RIghts’ submission to the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Thailand

ICJ and Thai Lawyers for Human RIghts’ submission to the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) of Thailand

Today, the ICJ and Thai Lawyers for Human Rights (TLHR) made a joint submission to the Human Rights Council’s Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review in advance of the Human Rights Council’s review of Thailand in April/May 2016.

In their submission, the ICJ and TLHR expressed concern about the following issues:

(1) the impact of the new legal and institutional framework, imposed since the May 2014 coup d’état, on human rights in Thailand;

(2) instances of suspected enforced disappearance and torture; and

(3) issues concerning international human rights instruments and mechanisms.

A copy of the submission can be found here:

THAILAND-UPR SUBMISSION FINAL AS LODGED-Advocacy-Non legal submission-2015-ENG (full text in PDF)


Translate »