Kazakhstan: Sergey Sizintsev’s disbarment is contrary to the law and should be revised

Kazakhstan: Sergey Sizintsev’s disbarment is contrary to the law and should be revised

Following the decision of the Petropavlovsk Court to disbar Sergey Sizintsev the former Executive Director of the National Bar Association, the ICJ reiterates its concerns at the unjustified proceedings against him.

The ICJ calls on the relevant authorities to revise the decision to disbar Sizintsev, which is not issued in accordance with the law and may constitute retaliation for his open criticism of the problematic reform of the legal profession in Kazakhstan.

On 21 May, the Petropavlovsk City Court No. 2, in a hearing chaired by judge Larisa Krukova, approved the application of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan to revoke Sergey Sizintsev’s license to practice law.

The formal reason for the disbarment was that the lawyer practiced law while being the Executive Director of the Republican Bar Association from 2016 to 2018.

According to the complaint of the Ministry of justice, a member of the Bar Association was prohibited from “occupying a position in the public service or engaging in business activities or holding any other paid position” in accordance with article 33.11 of the “Law on Advocates Activity and Legal Aid”.

Sizintsev argued that the Ministry of Justice incorrectly interpreted the notion of “another paid position”, since the second sentence of the same article states that “A lawyer has the right to be elected to a paid elected or appointed position in the Bar Association, the Republican Bar Association and international public associations of lawyers”.

Also, the lawyer stated that he had previously addressed a request to the Ministry of justice asking about possibility of holding a position in the Bar Association and working as an advocate and the Ministry of justice in its official response stated that “Lawyers occupying elective or appointed posts in the territorial or Republican bar associations are not obliged to take any action to terminate their license to engage in advocacy, unless there are other grounds provided by law”.

It was also answered, “that in this connection, for the indicated reasons, the validity of the license for the right to engage in advocacy activity should not been suspended”. In addition, the Ministry of Justice previously voiced a similar position on its official web-portal in response to a request from another user.

The ICJ has previously raised concerns that pressure on Sizintsev and other lawyers started after they had actively advocated against the law “On Advocates Activity and Legal Aid”, which attempted to interfere with the independence of the legal profession.

In that regard, the ICJ reiterates that according to the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers, lawyers like other citizens are entitled to freedom of expression, belief, association and assembly.

In particular, they have the right to take part in public discussion on matters concerning the law, the administration of justice and the promotion and protection of human rights and to join or form local, national or international organizations and attend their meetings, without suffering professional restrictions by reason of their lawful action or their membership in a lawful organization. (Principle 23).

In cases of disciplinary action against lawyers, international standards provide that “[a]ll disciplinary proceedings shall be determined in accordance with the code of professional conduct and other recognised standards and ethics of the legal profession and in the light of [the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers]” (Principle29).

Therefore, the ICJ calls for the case to be reconsidered on appeal in accordance with the clear terms of Article 33.11 of the Law on Advocates Activity and Legal Aid, and in light of the rights of lawyers to exercise their freedom of expression and association including through participation in organisations of lawyers and through criticism of legislation affecting the profession.

The ICJ further calls on the Ministry of Justice to end pressure on the active members of the Bar Association for legitimate exercise of their rights and duties as lawyers in accordance with the national legislation and international human rights standards and law.

The ICJ and Geneva Bar Association launch ambitious global project

The ICJ and Geneva Bar Association launch ambitious global project

The ICJ, the Geneva Bar Association and the Geneva legal community have joined forces to launch the ICJ-Geneva Lawyers International Cooperation Initiative. Under the Initiative, Geneva lawyers will join ICJ missions on the five continents to support the independence and integrity of lawyers and judges at risk, and to promote the Rule of Law.

The Initiative launches with a mission tomorrow, May 21st. A lawyer from the Geneva Bar Association will go to Guatemala to work the ICJ team and lawyers investigating and fighting the forced displacement of the indigenous community of La Laguna de El Petén.

Missions under the initiative will typically involve, among other things:

– Trial observations;

– Fact-finding missions;

– Support for the independence of lawyers and bar associations;

– Capacity building and training activities;

– Expertise and academic support.

Since its founding in 1952, the ICJ has played a unique and preeminent role as a non-governmental organization for the defense of the Rule of Law around the world, and the independence of judges and lawyers.

With the presence of its headquarters in Geneva for more than 60 years, through the Initiative the ICJ is further deepening its special bond with the city, to spread and share the spirit of Geneva.

“International support and solidarity are crucial to the work of lawyers defending the human rights of those who are often marginalized from power,” said Michaël Sombart, Director of Strategic Partnerships of the ICJ. “With this project the ICJ can help lawyers around the world benefit from the reputation and high standing of the Swiss legal community and bring the message of the Genève humanitaire beyond borders.”

“This initiative is welcome and we support it with commitment,” said Sandrine Giroud, member of the Geneva Bar Council and Chair of its Human Rights Commission. “The Rule of Law is under attack around the world and lawyers play a vital role in its defense and the impartiality of justice. Our support for the ICJ-Geneva Lawyers International Cooperation Initiative is in line with the lawyer’s mission as a bulwark against the arbitrariness and the defense advocacy tradition of the Geneva Bar Association. We welcome this collaboration, which is part of the fight for justice and respect for fundamental rights and guarantees. ”

Nicolas Gürtner, First Secretary of the Young Bar Association of the Geneva Bar Association, said: “This project offers a remarkable opportunity for young lawyers to work alongside the jurists of international repute of the ICJ in favour of the guarantee of Rule of Law.”

 The Steering Committee for the Initiative includes:

– The ICJ;

– For the Geneva Bar Association: the Commission on Human Rights and the Young Bar Association;

– Representatives of the Geneva judicial and academic world, including Professor Robert Roth, former President of the Court of Cassation, former director of the Geneva Academy, Professor Emeritus of the University of Geneva

Contact :

Michaël W. Sombart, ICJ, Director of Strategic Partnerships, t: +41 22 979 38 31 ; m: +41 77 965 98 45 ; e: michael.sombart(a)icj.org

 

NGOs Submission Ahead of the Third Biennial Report of the UN Secretary-General on the status of the human rights treaty body system

NGOs Submission Ahead of the Third Biennial Report of the UN Secretary-General on the status of the human rights treaty body system

Ahead of the 2020 review of the human rights treaty body system, the ICJ, together with a number of NGO partners, have made a joint submission to the UN Secretary-General ahead of his third and last biennial report to the UN General Assembly later this year on the status of the human rights treaty body system and the progress achieved in realising greater efficiency and effectiveness in the work of the treaty bodies. 
The joint NGO submission focuses on: 
  • the objectives and principles for the 2020 review;
  • visibility and accessibility;
  • membership;
  • working methods and inter-committee coordination; and
  • the growth of the treaty body system and adequate funding.
The full submission is available here.
Sri Lanka: Government must act to protect religious minorities against violence

Sri Lanka: Government must act to protect religious minorities against violence

The ICJ today condemned a series of the acts of violence directed against the Muslim community in the aftermath of the Easter attacks on 21 April in Sri Lanka directed at churches and other places.

In the most recent attacks on 13 May, at least one person was killed in anti-Muslim mob violence in Nattandiya.  In addition, various attacks have resulted in the looting and destruction of mosques, Muslim-owned businesses and houses in several parts of the island including Negombo, Chilaw, Kurunegala and Gampaha.

The ICJ called upon the State authorities to conduct independent, impartial and effective investigations into the attacks and bring all perpetrators to justice in line with international standards. Furthermore, the ICJ urges the Government of Sri Lanka to send a clear public message that acts of violence against any religious minorities are not tolerated.

 

“Attacks perpetrated against religious minorities are more likely to occur in a climate of impunity” said Fredrick Rawski, ICJ’s Regional Director for Asia and the Pacific. “The fact that Sri Lanka has a history of serious violations of human rights of religious minorities makes it even more urgent that the Government act to safeguard the human rights of all persons and take immediate measures to protect members of religious minorities from further violence.”

 

Delayed action or inaction on the part of law enforcement authorities during and in the immediate aftermath of the attacks has further exacerbated the situation. Given the recurring patterns of mob violence against religious minorities in Sri Lanka, a handful of arrests will not suffice. It must be followed up by independent and impartial investigations and, where warranted, prosecutions as part of an effective preventive strategy to counter such collectively organized violence.

Under international human rights law, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, to which Sri Lanka is a party, States have a duty to protect freedom of religion, which includes persons from religious minorities against abuses committed against them by any person or group.

The Government of Sri Lanka must take appropriate security measures in response to the worst terror attack in recent years. However, it must ensure that the volatile situation is not made worse by inaction to prevent anti-Muslim violence and vigilantism. Moreover, the State must ensure that any counter-terrorism measure is adopted and implemented in line with its international human rights law obligations and does not explicitly or implicitly target a particular community.

Translate »