Mar 9, 2016 | News
The recent decision of the Thai Supreme Court in the case of the enforced disappearance of Somchai Neelapaijit demonstrates Thailand must urgently ratify the Convention against Enforced Disappearance and enact domestic laws consistent with the Treaty, said the ICJ today.
On 29 December 2015, the Supreme Court of Thailand upheld the acquittals of five police officers charged with gang-robbery and coercion. These charges related to Somchai’s abduction and the taking of his property.
The authorities have blamed the failure to charge anyone to date with Somchai’s actual enforced disappearance or presumed death, in part, on the absence of physical remains.
The Supreme Court further held that Somchai Neelapaijit’s wife, Angkhana Neelapaijit, and his children could not participate in the proceedings as plaintiffs as, under Thai law, it had to be shown that Somchai Neelapaijit was either injured or killed such that he could not represent himself.
The Court reasoned that this was not the case as “it is not currently known whether or not Mr. Somchai is alive” and the accused had only been charged with gang-robbery and coercion.
“The Supreme Court decision does not in any way end Somchai’s case,” said Sam Zarifi, ICJ’s Asia Director.
“The Thai government is obliged to seek and provide truth and justice for Somchai and his family,” he added.
The Department of Special Investigations (DSI), often described as the FBI of Thailand, has been conducting an ongoing investigation into Somchai Neelapaijit’s fate or whereabouts since 2005.
“The glacial pace of the DSI’s investigation and unfortunate decision of the Supreme Court after all these years is heart-breaking,” said Zarifi.
Before the United Nations Human Rights Council in May 2008, the Royal Thai Government pledged “to do its utmost and leave no stone unturned in order to bring to justice the case of Mr Somchai.”
“But to do its ‘utmost’ to resolve this case, Thailand must take urgent and concrete steps to ratify the Convention against Enforced Disappearance and pass domestic laws that retrospectively recognize enforced disappearance as a distinct offence and the full rights of victims, including family members,” Zarifi added.
Promisingly, the Ministry of Justice is in the process of drafting a Prevention and Suppression of Torture and Enforced Disappearance Bill, which, in a draft seen by the ICJ, defines and criminalizes enforced disappearance and torture in Thailand.
Contacts
Sam Zarifi, ICJ Regional Director, Asia-Pacific Programme, t: +66807819002 ; e: sam.zarifi(a)icj.org
Kingsley Abbott, International Legal Adviser for Southeast Asia, t +66 94 470 1345 ; e: kingsley.abbott(a)icj.org
Additional information
Angkhana Neelapaijit, now Commissioner of the Thai Human Rights Commission, told the ICJ: “The decision of the Supreme Court acquitting the five accused and denying my children and me the right to participate in the proceedings shows that victims of enforced disappearance have nowhere to turn to obtain justice in Thailand. It is clear that nothing will change until Thailand urgently ratifies the Convention against Enforced Disappearance and amends its laws to ensure the rights of victims are upheld.”
Thailand signed, but has not yet ratified, the Convention Against Enforced Disappearance in January 2012. Pending the ratification, Thailand must desist from any acts that would defeat the objective and purpose of the Convention, which among other things places an obligation on State Parties to make enforced disappearance a criminal offence, to thoroughly and impartially investigate cases, bring those responsible to justice and treat family members of a ‘disappeared’ person as victims in their own right.
Forthcoming event
On 11 March 2016, the ICJ, together with Amnesty International (Thailand), Human Rights Watch, and the Justice for Peace Foundation will hold “a discussion on enforced disappearance in Thailand focusing on the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Somchai Neelapaijit’s case and the draft Prevention and Suppression of Torture and Enforced Disappearance Bill” to mark the 12-year anniversary since Somchai Neelapaijit “disappeared” on 12 March 2004.
Date: 11 March 2016
Time: 10.00am -12.00pm
Location: The Sukosol Hotel, room Kamolthip 3, Sriayutthaya Road, Bangkok
The speakers will be:
- Angkhana Neelapaijit
- Kingsley Abbott, International Legal Advisor, the International Commission of Jurists
- Sunai Phasuk, Senior Researcher, Human Rights Watch
- Laurent Meillan, Acting Representative, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights Office for South-East Asia
- A representative from the Department of Rights and Liberty Protection, Ministry of Justice
Related readings
To mark the 10-year anniversary of Somchai Neelapaijit’s “disappearance”, the ICJ released a report Ten Years Without Truth: Somchai Neelapaijit and Enforced Disappearances in Thailand, in which it documented the tortuous legal history of the case.
On 11 December 2015, the ICJ published an English version of its Practitioners Guide “Enforced Disappearance and Extrajudicial Execution: Investigation and Sanction”, originally published in Spanish in March 2015.
Thailand-Somchai disap anniversary 2016-News-Press releases-2016-THA (full text in Thai, PDF)
Mar 3, 2016 | News
One of the leading indigenous activists and human rights defenders in Honduras, Berta Cáceres had worked jointly with the ICJ on several projects. She was shot dead by unknown attackers at her home today.
The ICJ urges the Honduran authorities to launch a rapid and independent investigation to identify who perpetrated and/or ordered the murder of Berta Cáceres and bring the person(s) responsible into court.
“We have lost a courageous and committed human rights defender,” said Ramón Cadena, ICJ’s Regional Director for Central America.
“It is essential that this crime does not remain unpunished. The government must send a strong signal and take immediately measures to effectively investigate this killing and hold those responsible to account,” he added.
A relentless defender of indigenous peoples rights to land and natural resources, Berta Cáceres had been awarded the Goldmann Environmental Prize in 2015 (photo).
It is a huge loss not only for her family, but also for the whole human rights movement in Honduras, the ICJ said.
Berta Cáceres had received repeated death threats from both state security forces and the company planning the Agua Zarca dam, which she had successfully fought against, together with residents of the Lenca Community.
She had been placed under the protection of the local police in La Esperanza, the area where she lived. Obviously this was not enough.
The situation of human rights defenders in Honduras is dire and has continuously deteriorated in the recent years, with their activities being systematically criminalized.
Mar 1, 2016 | Advocacy, News, Non-legal submissions
The ICJ joined today other prominent human rights organizations in urging the European Union and its Member States to respect and protect human rights and the rule of law in countering terrorism.
In their joint statement, the thirteen human rights organizations stressed the implications of Eu counter-terrorism laws and policies for human rights and the rule of law with regard to the right to be free from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, the principle of non-refoulement, the right to liberty and security of the person, the right to a fair trial, the principle of legality, the principle of non-discrimination, the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly, the right to privacy, the rights of asylum-seekers and migrants, the freedoms of movement, of religion or belief and other dimensions.
The human rights organizations that signed up to this statement are, apart from the International Commission of Jurists, the European Network Against Racism (ENAR), Amnesty International, the International Federation of Human Rights (FIDH), the Open Society European Policy Institute, the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT), Fair Trials, European Digital Rights (EDRi), the Forum of European Muslim Youth and Student Organisations (FEMYSO), the International Federation of Action by Christians for the Abolition of Torture (FIACAT), the International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims (IRCT), the Association for the Prevention of Torture (APT), and the European Association for the Defense of Human Rights (AEDH).
EU-counter-terrorism&humanrights-jointstatement-2016-ENG (download the joint statement)
Mar 1, 2016 | News
En mayo de 2015, la empresa REPSA entregó un oficio en el Ministerio de Ambiente y Recursos Naturales donde acepta su responsabilidad por el desborde de sus lagunas de oxidación artificial que se derramaron sobre las aguas del río La Pasión el 28 de abril de 2015.
Sobre un segundo evento del 6 de junio de 2015 no hubo un reconocimiento de su responsabilidad.
El daño causado al Río la Pasión persiste al día de hoy y ha obligado a varias comunidades que allí habitan a buscar fuentes alternativas de sustento y trabajo.
El 10 de junio de 2015, vecinos del municipio de Sayaxché, en asamblea general integraron la Comisión por la Defensa de la Vida y la Naturaleza, para dar seguimiento por la vía legal a la contaminación del río.
El 11 de junio de 2015 presentaron una denuncia en el Ministerio Público con sede en el Municipio de San Benito, departamento de El Petén y demandaron a la empresa REPSA.
La Jueza Karla Hernández del Juzgado Pluripersonal de Primera Instancia Penal, Narcoactividad y Delitos contra el Ambiente resolvió investigar y suspender las operaciones de la empresa por un período de seis meses.
La decisión de la Jueza provocó diferentes acciones en su contra.
Entre las acciones más evidentes se cuentan: a) Antejuicio presentado en septiembre de 2016 por abogados vinculados a la empresa REPSA, el cual fue declarado sin lugar por la Corte Suprema de Justicia el 9 de diciembre de 2015; b) Demanda de juicio sumario civil para deducción de responsabilidades civiles por “extralimitación de sus facultades como juez B del Juzgado Pluripersonal de Primera Instancia Penal, Narcoactividad y Delitos contra el Ambiente del Municipio de San Benito, Departamento de El Petén, toda vez que ordenó una medida precautoria que no está contemplada en la ley”; esta denuncia fue aceptada para su trámite por la Sala Regional Mixta de la Corte de Apelaciones del Departamento de El Petén, Municipio de Poptún el 6 de octubre de 2015 y se encuentra en trámite.
Acerca de estas acciones, la CIJ considera:
- Según los Principios básicos de las Naciones Unidas relativos a la independencia de la judicatura no se efectuarán intromisiones indebidas o injustificadas en el proceso judicial, ni se someterán a revisión las decisiones judiciales de los tribunales, salvo la vía de la revisión judicial por medio de los recursos legales existentes;
- En el presente caso, la decisión de la jueza Hernández fue recurrida conforme los recursos propios del proceso penal (reposición y apelación); sin embargo, mediante otras acciones, se tomaron medidas en contra de la jueza Hernández y no contra la resolución emitida por ella, como debiera ser.
- Estas acciones atentan contra la independencia judicial, en tanto buscan evitar que la Jueza Hernández conozca el caso;
- La Jueza Hernández ha recibido amenazas sin que el Estado de Guatemala le brinde la protección debida;
Ramón Cadena, Director de la Comisión Internacional de Juristas para Centroamérica expresó: “Urgimos a las autoridades del Sistema de Justicia a tomar medidas adecuadas para evitar que las y los jueces independientes, resulten afectados por este tipo de acciones e intimidaciones.”
Mar 1, 2016 | Events
The ICJ is co-sponsoring a panel discussion on the situation for human rights in Burundi, as a side-event to the UN Human Rights Council, 4 March 2016.Details are available in the flyer available to download here: HRC31-sideeventflyer-burundi-2016
Feb 29, 2016 | News
El día 1 de febrero del presente año, el Juez Tercero de Primera Instancia Penal Narcoactividad y Delitos contra el Ambiente desestimó la querella presentada por el Señor Ricardo Méndez Ruiz en febrero de 2015, en contra del Fiscal de Derechos Humanos Licenciado Orlando López.
Dicha querella pretendía afectar la labor que ha venido realizando el Fiscal Orlando López a favor de la lucha contra la impunidad, criminalizándolo y afectando su derecho a la libertad de expresión.
La CIJ celebra dicha resolución que reconoce la función de defensores y defensoras de derechos humanos, operadores de justicia, abogados y abogadas y a la sociedad guatemalteca.
En este caso, el Fiscal de Derechos Humanos tuvo que enfrentar una querella por casi un año.
Recientemente la Corte de Constitucionalidad denegó un Recurso de Amparo presentado por Ricardo Méndez Ruiz en contra del Procurador de los Derechos Humanos, por haber emitido dicho Procurador la resolución en la que declaró “la violación de los derechos a la dignidad, a la integridad, a la seguridad que constituyen una amenaza al derecho a la vida, a la igualdad, la libertad de accion y de asociación de los defensores de Derechos Humanos y los miembros de organizaciones no gubernamentales de derechos humanos…” y señaló como responsable de dicha violación al señor Ricardo Méndez Ruiz.
Finalmente, el Procurador de Derechos Humanos recomendó a Ricardo Méndez Ruiz “abstenerse de realizar señalamientos para criminalizar la labor de los defensores y defensoras de derechos humanos en Guatemala” y lo invitó a reflexionar sobre el “daño social que representa difundir masivamente el tipo de contenidos analizados” en dicha resolución, por medio de los cuales “no sólo agrede a personas, organizaciones o movimientos, representantes diplomáticos y Misiones Internacionales, sino también fomenta el odio y la confrontación social”.
Ante este amparo, la Corte de Constitucionalidad resolvió que “el acto señalado como objeto de reproche no genera agravio constitucional susceptible de ser reparado en amparo” y que “debe denegarse la protección constitucional solicitada” por Ricardo Méndez Ruiz.
La CIJ hace un nuevo llamado a las autoridades del Estado de Guatemala para que inicie una investigación exhaustiva e imparcial acerca de las actuales campañas contra defensores y defensoras de derechos humanos y que adopte las medidas necesarias de acuerdo a derecho con respecto a dichos actos.
