Forum on indigenous & other traditional or customary justice systems in Africa

Forum on indigenous & other traditional or customary justice systems in Africa

For the 10th annual Geneva Forum of Judges and Lawyers, the ICJ has partnered with the International Development Law Organization and the ICJ Kenya Section, to organise in Nairobi a high-level regional Forum on alternative dispute resolution and indigenous and other traditional or customary justice systems in Africa.

Under the auspices of the Judiciary of Kenya, the “Regional Forum on Alternative Dispute Resolution & Customary and Informal Justice: Advancing SDG16 and Pathways to Justice” will provide a platform to allow for a deeper reflection on access to justice through alternative and indigenous or other traditional or customary justice systems, providing greater insight into local realities, concerns and approaches and exploring existing lessons, illustrations, and good practices.

The Forum will also facilitate the identification of culturally appropriate, people-centered, sustainable and effective paths for policy and programming that reduce existing justice gaps as well as address challenges in diverse contexts.

Invited justice champions from national governments, the formal and informal justice sectors, and civil society will share insights on ongoing justice sector reforms and policy development that aim to provide alternatives to or complement formal courts, curb rights-abrogating practices, and contribute to inclusive and peaceful societies.

A concept note is available in PDF format here: NairobiConferenceConceptNote

The programme is available in PDF format here: NairobiConferenceAgenda

The final report of the Forum is available in PDF format here.

The Forum is made possible with support from the Government of the Netherlands and the Republic and Canton of Geneva.

For further background on the ICJ Geneva Forum of Judges and Lawyers, and its ongoing global project on indigenous and other traditional or customary justice systems, click here.

A compilation of international sources is available here.

For more information contact matt.pollard(a)icj.org

Canada: Supreme Court affirms that Eritreans can seek redress against Canadian Company for human rights abuses

Canada: Supreme Court affirms that Eritreans can seek redress against Canadian Company for human rights abuses

The ICJ today welcomed the judgement of the Canadian Supreme Court in the Case of Araya v, Nevsun, which allows a civil lawsuit by a group of Eritrean plaintiffs to proceed against Canadian company Nevsun Resources Ltd. for its alleged involvement in forced labour, slavery, torture and other serious human rights abuses against plaintiffs.

The ICJ together with Amnesty International-Canada intervened in the case as a third party, arguing that Canada’s common law should be read in a manner consistent with the right to an effective remedy for human rights violations under international law and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

“This judgment is a landmark achievement for workers and other victims of human rights violations as well for international rule of law and justice,” said Carlos Lopez, Senior Legal adviser at the ICJ.

“The Supreme Court of Canada has shown that misapplied legal doctrine should not stand in the way of people’s right to effective remedy and reparations,” he added.

In the case, the Supreme Court of Canada  rejected the company’s contention that the “act of state doctrine” would preclude the case from going forward.

The Court concluded that this doctrine is not in fact part of Canadian law.

The company also contended that the allegations of breach of customary international law  could only be applicable to States and not to the company itself.

The Court, however, held that customary international law, including customary human rights law, is part of Canadian law and could apply to Nevsun as a corporate entity.

In a significant victory for the plaintiffs and other similarly situated alleged victims, the Supreme Court has allowed the case to proceed, dismissing jurisdictional and procedural objections from Nevsun.

The proceedings before the Supreme Court originated in an appeal by the defendant company Nevsun Resources Ltd against the British Columbia Court of Appeal’s judgment of 2017 which upheld the rights of claimants to sue in Canada.

The claim filed in 2015 argued that Nevsun Resources was involved in various ways in the practice of forced labour, slavery, torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, and crimes against humanity at the Bisha mine (picture) against hundreds of Eritreans who were conscripted into the Eritrean National Service Programme and forced to working in the mine operated jointly by Nevsun and Eritrean State companies.

The claimants were allegedly forced to work in the Bisha mine and fled the country to find refuge in Canada, where they sued Nevsun.

Benin: ICJ convenes training and judicial dialogue for implementation of human rights in Francophone Africa

Benin: ICJ convenes training and judicial dialogue for implementation of human rights in Francophone Africa

From 12-13 February, the ICJ, in collaboration with the Supreme Court of the Republic of Benin and the African Association of the Francophone Higher Jurisdictions, hosted regional judicial dialogue and training for effective implementation of human rights in francophone Africa in Cotonou.

The President of the Constitutional Court of Benin, Justice Joseph Duogbenou, the Vice President of the ECOWAS Community Court of Justice, Justice Ouattara Gberi Be and the President of the High Court of Benin, Lady Justice Marie Cecile de Dravo Zinzindohoue were among the participants.

Judges and other jurists representing the Supreme Courts and Constitutional Courts of Benin, Burkina Faso Cameroon, DR Congo, Gabon, Guinea, Côte d’Ivoire, Mali, Niger, Senegal and Togo also participated.

President Patrice Talon, who was represented by the Minister of Justice and the Legislature, M. Maxime Ouenum, opening the ceremony, noted that ‘fundamental rights and freedoms are binding on legislative, executive and judicial authorities because of the Constitutional, Conventional and National protection they enjoy’. They therefore ‘create obligations on states and on those who act on behalf of states, they cannot be ignored, denied or discarded’.

President of the Supreme Court of Benin, M. Ousmane Batoko emphasized the need  to strengthen the capacity of judges for a more effective application of international human rights law in domestic adjudication.  According to Justice Batoko, ‘The judge is at the very heart of the day to day construction and perpetuation of international human rights law.

‘’The protection of human rights goes beyond international and national legislation, and requires active protection by judges in the court rooms across Africa‘‘ said Arnold Tsunga,  ICJ’s Africa Regional Director.  He expressed hope that the dialogue would help to ensure that African peoples enjoy their human rights in totality. “The architecture for the protection of human rights can only be effective when national judges are equipped to play the very vital role that they have as the first layer of protection available to victims of human rights violations,“ Tsunga added.

At the end of the two-day programme which included lectures and judicial conversations, participants adopted a communique in which they affirmed their continued commitment to the promotion and protection of human rights in Africa expressing a desire for such colloquia to be held more frequently in order to build the capacity of the judiciaries in West Africa.

Contact

Arnold Tsunga, ICJ Regional Director for Africa, t: +27 716405926 or +263 777 283 249: e: arnold.tsunga@icj.org

Solomon Ebobrah, Senior Legal Adviser (ARP), t: +234 803 492 7549, e: Solomon.ebobrah@icj.org

Zimbabwe: ICJ holds anti-corruption judicial workshop

Zimbabwe: ICJ holds anti-corruption judicial workshop

The ICJ, in collaboration with the Zimbabwe Judicial Service Commission (JSC), convened an Anti-Corruption workshop from 27-30 January 2020.

The objective was to enhance the capacity of judicial and law enforcement officials and prosecutors in respect of their roles in anti-corruption prevention and enforcement and cyber-crime investigation.

The workshop was led by Hon. Justice Lawrence Gidudu, the Head of the Anti-Corruption Division of the High Court in Uganda, who was assisted by Moses Modoi a lawyer specializing in research and capacity building that supports anti-corruption courts.

In his keynote address, Hon. Mr Justice L. Malaba Chief Justice underlined that participation by key justice actors showed commitment towards the fight against corruption.

He noted that the education and training aspects aimed to create a common understanding of standards and techniques to be applied when handling corruption matters.

He expressed the sentiment that there were lessons to be learned from the Ugandan Court which currently has had a high success rate in corruption cases.

The training workshop is part of the ICJ’s wider efforts to ensure access to justice for all in Zimbabwe and elsewhere.

The main focus here was on the global outlook and emergency of anti-corruption action; analysis of municipal Anti-Corruption legislation; managing trials in anti-corruption courts, corruption as a transnational crime, admissibility of digital evidence; asset recovery and ethics and integrity.

There were 49 participants in the portions of the workshops from 27-28 January, including 18 women, comprising Judges from the Zimbabwe High Court; Regional, Provincial and Senior Magistrates; and Registrars from the Superior Courts.

Photo: Justice Loice Matanda-Moyo, Chairperson for the Zimbabwe Anti-Corruption Commission Justice Loice Matanda-Moyo

Translate »