Perry v. Schwarzenegger (“Proposition 8”), United States District Court for the Northern District of California (4 August 2010)
Procedural Posture The plaintiffs, two same-sex couples, brought suit challenging Proposition 8 as a violation of due process (“liberty”) and equal protection under the 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution. The plaintiffs named as defendants the Governor...McMillen v. Itawamba County School District, District Court of N.D. Mississippi, United States (23 March 2010)
Procedural Posture The plaintiff filed a preliminary injunction on freedom of expression grounds challenging the defendant school district’s decisions, to prohibit her from bringing her girlfriend to the prom and wearing a tuxedo to the prom, and to cancel the event...US-Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Non-Discrimination Provision (2010)
US-Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Non-Discrimination Provision-2010-eng
Torture is a serious crime, not “poor judgment”
The ICJ today deplored the decision of the US Justice Department to clear the legal architects of the US torture policy from any professional misconduct.
The decision by Associate Deputy Attorney General (ADAG) David Margolis reversed the July 2009 findings of the Office of Professional Conduct (OPR) that Bush administration legal advisers John Yoo and Jay Bybee had engaged in professional misconduct by giving advice which approved as lawful the program of “enhanced interrogation”. This program consisted in clear acts of torture and ill treatment.
The OPR had been poised to refer Yoo and Bybee, who is presently a US federal judge, for disciplinary action by the state regulatory authorities. The ADAG report, while affirming that the legal advisers had exercised ‘poor judgement’, determined that they had not breached rules of misconduct because it could not be established that they had intended to give misleading advise.
USA-torture serious crime-press release-2010 (full text, PDF)
Photo by acameronhuff