On 26 November, a panel of nine Supreme Court judges unanimously upheld the route of the separation wall in the West Bank, in a case in which the Palestinian petitioners claimed that the wall violated their property rights and their economic, social and cultural rights. The Israeli Government has defended the construction of the wall as necessary to prevent terrorist attacks. The Court held that the balance between the degree of security obtained for Israeli citizens and the injury to the rights of the Palestinians was proportional. In 2004, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) found that the construction of the wall violated international law.
ICJ Advisory OpinionRecent News
Strong push back against US sanctions on the International Criminal Court at UN Human Rights Council
11 Jul 2025ECtHR Grand Chamber Ruling in Semenya v. Switzerland: Joint Statement of Third-Party Interveners
10 Jul 2025UN Human Rights Council struggles to fulfil its mandate in the midst of global attacks on human rights, the rule of law and multilateralism
09 Jul 2025South Africa: ICJ urges high court to apply international law protecting migrants and refugees from discrimination and xenophobia in case involving vigilante attacks
08 Jul 2025