On 4 June, two military judges rejected cases against Salim Hamdan and Omar Khadr on the ground that military commissions did not have jurisdiction over O. Khadr and S. Hamdan, as they had been classified as “enemy combatants” and not “unlawful enemy combatants”. On 4 July, the Pentagon prosecutors filed an appeal in the case of Omar Khadr to the new Court of Military Commissions Review, claiming that the designation of “enemy combatant” is sufficient to establish jurisdiction, and that in any case a military judge can determine the status of “unlawful enemy combatant”.
HRW Press ReleaseRecent News
ICJ Convenes Latin America Consultation to Strengthen Non-Criminal Justice Pathways for Redress20 Jul 2026
India: New foreign funding rules tighten control over civil society and undermine the right to freedom of association17 Jul 2026
Thailand: Strengthening accountability for torture and enforced disappearance in the southern border provinces15 Jul 2026
Human Rights Council concludes its 62nd session with action on country crises and key human rights challenges10 Jul 2026
