On 28 November, a district court ruled that parts of the Executive Order authorizing the freezing of assets of suspected terrorists and terrorist organizations, were vague and therefore unconstitutional. The Order, issued by the President in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, gave the President broad authority to designate organizations and individuals as terrorist without any criteria and authorized the Secretary of Treasury to designate those “otherwise associated” with a designated terrorist group. The case was brought on behalf of the Humanitarian Law Project, an NGO seeking to provide human rights advocacy training to the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) in Turkey and several other organizations seeking to support humanitarian activities of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in Sri Lanka.
Press ArticleRecent News
Strong push back against US sanctions on the International Criminal Court at UN Human Rights Council
11 Jul 2025ECtHR Grand Chamber Ruling in Semenya v. Switzerland: Joint Statement of Third-Party Interveners
10 Jul 2025UN Human Rights Council struggles to fulfil its mandate in the midst of global attacks on human rights, the rule of law and multilateralism
09 Jul 2025South Africa: ICJ urges high court to apply international law protecting migrants and refugees from discrimination and xenophobia in case involving vigilante attacks
08 Jul 2025