Mar 1, 2018 | Events, News
This side event at the 37th session of the Human Rights Council takes place on Friday, 2 march, 15:00-16:30, room XI of the Palais des Nations. It is organized by the Civic Space Initiative (CSI) and co-sponsored by the ICJ.
In recent years, the use of exceptional national security and emergency powers to combat terrorism has become increasingly common.
The international instruments recognize that respect for human rights and rule of law are the basis of the fight against terrorism.
However, counterterrorism measures and emergency powers have increasingly resulted in or been used to restrict fundamental freedoms, including the rights to assembly, association and expression.
In this context, it is necessary for states and civil society to increase their understanding of the relationship between entrenched emergency powers and sustained human rights violations and to further elaborate guidelines and good practices that will return respect for human rights to the center of state efforts to combat terrorism.
This event aims to elevate attention and further explore the pernicious effects of states of emergency and emergency powers on human rights and fundamental freedoms with particular attention to the rights of freedom of association, assembly, and expression. It will also address how states of emergency often facilitate targeting and undermining the work of human rights defenders.
Speakers:
- Professor Fionnuala Ni Aolain, UN Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human
rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism
- Kerem Altiparmak, Ankara University, Faculty of Political Science
- Yared Hailemariam, Director, Association for Human Rights in Ethiopia
- Lisa Oldring, Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights
- Sonia Tanic, Representative to the United Nations, International Federation for Human Rights
Moderator:
- Nicholas Miller, International Center for Not-for-Profit Law
Coffee/croissants served at 14:45
For more information contact: nmiller@icnl.org, vanja@ecnl.org
The event will be livestreamed on the @CIVICUS Facebook page
Universal – Counterrorism and Civic Space – News – Events – 2018 – News (Event flyer in PDF)
Feb 6, 2018 | News
The ICJ today condemned the Maldivian Government’s assault on the Supreme Court and its judges and the suspension of human rights protections under the state of emergency.
“President Yameen and his Government have dealt a grave blow to the rule of law and independence of the judiciary in the Maldives,” said Ian Seiderman, ICJ’s Legal and Policy Director.
“The actions by the government are a wildly unjustifiable and disproportionate response to the decision of the Supreme Court”, he added.
On 5 February, the Maldivian Government declared a 15-day state of emergency under Article 253 of the Constitution, suspending a range of human rights protections.
The declaration of emergency followed a Supreme Court judgment on 1 February that ordered the release of at least nine members of opposition parties, who were in detention on a number of charges.
The Government, however, refused to implement the Supreme Court’s judgment, which resulted in the outbreak of protests in the country.
The national defense forces also reportedly entered the premises of the Supreme Court and arrested at least two senior judges, including Chief Justice Abdulla Saeed.
“Summarily suspending basic rights protections and arresting judges whose decisions the President disagrees with is itself a display of sweeping lawlessness in the country,” Seiderman said.
According to the President’s office, the state of emergency was imposed because the Supreme Court order resulted in “disruption of the functions of the executive power, disruption of the functions of the state institutions…and infringement of national security and public interest.”
According to an unofficial translation of the emergency decree received by the ICJ, the constitutionally and internationally protected rights that have been suspended in part or in full during the state of emergency include, among others, the right to liberty; the right to freedom of assembly; the right to privacy; and the right to obtain remedy from the courts.
Basic safeguards surrounding arrest, detention, search and seizures have also been suspended.
In addition, laws providing certain immunities to judges and the right of judges to be informed if any action is taken against them have also been suspended.
“The complete suspension of constitutional protections for human rights such as the right to liberty and right to free assembly goes far beyond anything that could be justified by the alleged grounds cited by the government,” Seiderman added.
The ICJ notes that international law strictly regulates attempts by governments to suspend or otherwise derogate from human rights on the grounds of emergency.
The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), to which the Maldives is a State Party, expressly permits derogations only for certain human rights, and then only ‘in time of public emergency which threatens the life of the nation’.
Measures of derogation may only be taken to the extent necessary to meet a specific threat to the life of the nation.
“Maldivian authorities have not even come close to explaining how the current situation constitutes a threat to the ‘life of the nation’, the high threshold set by international law for the derogation of rights in times of emergency,” Seiderman said.
The ICJ urges the Government to immediately lift the state of emergency, release judges of the Supreme Court, implement the ruling of the Supreme Court and ensure the independence of the judiciary.
Contact
Ian Seiderman, ICJ Legal and Policy Director, T: +41 22 979 38 37 ; e: ian.seiderman@icj.org
Reema Omer, ICJ International Legal Adviser for South Asia (London), t: +447889565691; e: reema.omer@icj.org
Additional information
Under international standards, including the UN Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary, it is the duty of all governmental and other institutions to respect and observe the independence of the judiciary.
This means that there shall not be any inappropriate or unwarranted interference with the judicial process and judges shall be free to decide cases without any restrictions, pressures, threats or interferences.
In August 2015, following a joint fact-finding mission to the Maldives, the ICJ and South Asians for Human Rights (SAHR) documented the breakdown of the rule of law and human rights in the Maldives in a 35-page report, Justice Adrift: Rule of Law and the Political Crisis in the Maldives.
Jan 30, 2018 | Agendas, Events
The ICJ invites you to an event to discuss challenges in prevention of, and accountability for, violations of human rights in renditions and other transfers of suspects, including through past European complicity in US-led renditions, and in ongoing transfers of suspects in the CIS region.
Join us for a discussion marking the EU launch of the International Commission of Jurists’ report, Transnational Injustices: National Security Transfers and International Law. The event is kindly hosted by Ana Gomez and Eva Joly, MEPs.
Panelists will discuss the ongoing practice of states unlawfully rendering people accused of terrorism, accountability for violations of human rights in past renditions, and how the EU institutions and EU Member States should address these.
When: Tuesday 30 January 16.00 – 18.00
Where: Room A5G305, European Parliament, Brussels
RSVP to: anamaria.gomes@europarl.europa.eu
Speakers include:
- Ana Gomes, Member of the European Parliament
- Eva Joly, Member of the European Parliament
- Róisín Pillay, International Commission of Jurists
- Natacha Kazachkine, Open Society European Policy Institute
A flyer for this event is available in PDF format by clicking here.
Jan 18, 2018 | Artículos, Noticias
La CIJ está hondamente preocupada por los últimos actos del poder ejecutivo y del Congreso de la República, que atentan contra la vigencia del estado de derecho y de los derechos humanos en Guatemala.
“Las autoridades del Estado de Guatemala al más alto nivel están implementando una política exterior fundamentada en una errónea interpretación de la soberanía nacional y en el absoluto desprecio por el derecho internacional de los derechos humanos, todo ello para defender los intereses personales de funcionarios de los tres poderes del Estado y así hacer prevalecer el sistema de impunidad que ha existido en el país, en las últimas décadas. Todo ello es parte del Pacto de Corrupción e Impunidad que existe en el país y que proviene de las autoridades al más alto nivel.”, declaró Ramón Cadena, Director de la CIJ para Centro América.
Por ende, y con fundamento en la Convención Interamericana contra la Corrupción y la Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos, la CIJ hace un llamado a la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos para que envíe una misión al país, con el mandato de investigar la existencia de este Pacto de Corrupción e Impunidad y evitar así, que avance y cause un grave daño irreparable a la democracia y al pueblo de Guatemala.
Asímismo, con fundamento en la Convención de Naciones Unidas contra la Corrupción, urge a la Representante Residente del Sistema de Naciones Unidas, a tomar las medidas adecuadas para evitar que continúe avanzando dicho pacto.
El Presidente Jimmy Morales (foto) declaró sin ningún fundamento, persona non grata al Comisionado de la Comisión Internacional contra la Impunidad en Guatemala (CICIG), Sr. Iván Velásquez; posteriormente, diputados y diputadas del Congreso de la República intentaron reformar el Código Penal; recientemente, el Superintendente de la Secretaría de Administración Tributaria (SAT) fue removido de su cargo; se han registrado intentos de destituir ilegalmente al Procurador de los Derechos Humanos por parte del Congreso de la República, ya que dicho funcionario ha cumplido con su mandato según la ley; el Presidente de la República está intentando modificar el mandato de la CICIG y/o expulsar al Comisionado Iván Velásquez del país. Estos gravísimos hechos demuestran que las autoridades del Estado de Guatemala, pretenden menoscabar el funcionamiento de la administración pública y promover la impunidad de sus actos.
Por medio de la negociación de la paz y con fundamento en el derecho humano a la paz, el Estado de Guatemala asumió el compromiso de reformar, fortalecer y modernizar la gestión pública, en procura de un manejo transparente y honrado en el uso de los recursos públicos, como condición para lograr que la administración pública tenga la capacidad de cumplir con el supremo deber impuesto al Estado de Guatemala por la Constitución Política, de garantizar a los habitantes del país el bien común.
La CIJ recuerda que es un principio aceptado nacional e internacionalmente, que le está prohibido a las autoridades en cualquier nivel, utilizar el poder que le confiere el ejercicio del cargo o empleo en las entidades del Estado, autónomas o descentralizadas, de participar o influir en la toma de decisiones en beneficio personal o de tercero. Hacerlo atenta en contra de la democracia y del estado de derecho.
El abuso de poder en el ejercicio de la función pública socava las bases del estado de derecho y constituye un acto ilícito, contrario a la Constitución, que debe ser investigado y castigado por las autoridades de justicia con prontitud.
De lo contrario, si no se toman ahora las medidas legales adecuadas, para detener la imposición del Pacto de Corrupción e Impunidad que las autoridades al más alto nivel vienen impulsando, las consecuencias pueden llegar a ser de una magnitud y consecuencias irreparables, causando graves daños a la población guatemalteca y al estado de derecho en Guatemala.
Oct 31, 2017
The ICJ presented a submission on the systems of extradition, expulsion and abductions of the Russian Federation to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe.
The submission was presented for the consideration by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on the implementation by the Russian Federation of a series of judgments of the European Court of Human Rights in the group of cases Garabayev v. Russia and others.
In particular, the ICJ presented its recent findings in the report Transnational Injustices – National Security Transfers and International Law that provides the most recent assessment of the systems of extradition, expulsion and abduction/rendition of the Russian Federation and States in Central Asia compared with the laws and practices in this field of EU Member States and the US rendition system.
The ICJ submission refers to the lack of compliance by the Russian Federation with the judgments of the European Court of Human Rights with regard to the respect of the principle of non-refoulement (articles 3 ECHR), the lack of effective remedy against violations of this principle (article 3 and 13 ECHR), as well as the lack of compliance with the Court’s interim measures (article 34 ECHR).
Russian Federation-Garabaev-Transfer-Shortcomings-Advocacy-Legal submissions-2017-ENG (Download the submission)
