Nov 5, 2019 | News
The ICJ welcomed today’s ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union finding that Poland violated the independence of the judiciary by lowering in 2017 the pension age of Polish judges and giving the power to maintain them in office to the Minister of Justice.
The Court also found that the new law creating widely disparate retirement ages between women and men who are ordinary court judges or prosecutors – 60 and 65 respectively – constituted unlawful discrimination
“The Court of Justice has upheld the cardinal principle of the rule of law that the terms of judges cannot be determined controlled on an ad hoc basis by political powers,” said Massimo Frigo, Senior Legal Adviser of the ICJ Europe and Central Asia Programme.
“This judgment confirms that these retirement laws were a direct blow to the principle of separation of powers, the bedrock of the rule of law,” he added.
The Court of Justice held as contrary to the principle of independence of the judiciary under article 19 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU as series of laws lowering the age of retirement for ordinary judges, prosecutors and Supreme Court judges from 70 to 65 years for men and 65 to 60 for women. These laws allowed the Minister of Justice to decide which judges are to be reinstated.
“Poland should scrap these laws entirely and reinstate fully the situation of the judiciary prior to their enactment,” Frigo said.
“These laws were but a part of the systemic attack to the independence of the judiciary that the Polish government should stop,” he added.
The ICJ also called on Poland to bring the retirement ages of men and women back into parity.
The case was brought by the European Commission in an infringement proceeding against Poland for violation of the obligation to provide access to justice for EU law violations under article 19 TFEU.
Contact:
Massimo Frigo, Senior Legal Adviser of the ICJ Europe and Central Asia Programme, t: +41 22 979 3805 ; e: massimo.frigo(a)icj.org
More information on Massimo Frigo’s blog
Oct 22, 2019 | Artículos, Noticias
La CIJ anuncia visita de delegación internacional de alto nivel para participar en la VII Conferencia Regional sobre Independencia Judicial el 25 y 26 de Octubre.
La CIJ en Centroamérica llevará a cabo la VII Conferencia Regional sobre Independencia Judicial, con el tema central de la Seguridad de Jueces y Juezas.
En ella se debatirá sobre el papel que deben de jugar los estados, para la protección de jueces y juezas, así como la relación que existe entre la independencia judicial y la seguridad de quienes imparten justicia.
Han llegado al país, la magistrada de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de Serbia y Comisionada de la CIJ, Radmila Dragicevic, el Magistrado Emérito del Tribunal Supremo Español y Comisionado de la CIJ José Antonio Martín Pallín, dos Jueces de Noruega Erland Flaterud y Finn-Arne Schanche y 9 Jueces de Centroamérica, entre los cuáles se encuentra el Magistrado de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de El Salvador Leonardo Ramírez Murcia. Además, participará el Presidente de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de Costa Rica, Fernando Cruz Castro.
Guatemala-Judicial Conference CA-News-2019-SPA
Oct 22, 2019 | News
On 25 and 26 October, the ICJ in Central America will hold the VII Regional Conference on Judicial Independence, with the central theme of the protection and security of Judges.
The Conference will discuss the role that governments should play in the protection of judges, as well as the relationship between judicial independence and security of those who deliver justice.
Participants from outside the region include Radmila Dragicevic Justice of the Supreme Court of Cassation of Serbia and Vice-President of the ICJ; José Antonio Martín Pallín, Judge Emeritus of the Spanish Supreme Court of Justice and ICJ Commissioner, and Erland Flaterud and Finn Arne Schanche, both judges from Norway.
Nine other judges from Central America will attend, including Leonardo Ramírez of the Supreme Court of Justice of El Salvador Murcia and Fernando Cruz Castro, President of the Supreme Court of Justice of Costa Rica.
The ICJ regrets that the Supreme Court of Justice of Guatemala has not been in a position to receive this important delegation at its plenary on 23 October to address the issue of the security of judges.
The ICJ recalls that this Conference is held within the framework of a letter of cooperation and understanding agreed with the former President of the Judicial Branch and the Supreme Court of Justice, Ranulfo Rojas Cetina in 2015.
The ICJ is particularly concerned that there is presently an unfilled vacancy for Chief of Security for the judiciary, following the resignation of the former Chief who had allegedly engaged in conduct not consistent with his function.
Ramón Cadena, Director of the ICJ for Central America, said: “It is the duty of the Supreme Court of Justice to inform the Guatemalan public about the Judges Protection System, so that it does not become a source of corruption or in any way interferes with the work of independent, and impartial judges.”
In Guatemala, the international delegation will meet with judges such as Yassmín Barrios, Ericka Aifán, Miguel Ángel Gálvez, Carlos Ruano and Pablo Xitumul among others. They have been the subject of seemingly unfounded complaints which have posed risks to their personal security and independent judicial functioning.
Oct 11, 2019 | News
The ICJ in partnership with the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) convened the 2019 International Humanitarian Law (IHL) moot court competition.
The IHL moot court competition brought together 12 law students from Great Zimbabwe University, Midlands State University, University of Zimbabwe and Zimbabwe Ezekiel Guti University; to engage with IHL issues.
The Great Zimbabwe University students won the competition and will participate in the All Africa Moot Court Competitions to be held in Arusha, Tanzania representing Zimbabwe.
Moot Court competitions are a part of the philosophy of developing a conscientious lawyer and contributing to law graduates who have an affinity for defending human rights and the rule of law. IHL incorporates human rights principles in times of war. As a result, understanding IHL allows students to have an understanding of the application and limitations of human rights during times of war. The moot court competitions additionally equip the students with an invaluable opportunity to develop key advocacy skills.
“The moot competition gives law students the opportunity to have experiential learning and can be one among an array of interventions that could be done to supplement the university education of lawyers in Zimbabwe that has not been very strong on human rights and humanitarian law,” said Arnold Tsunga, Director of ICJ’s Africa Regional Programme.
The competition was held from 8 October to 11 October 2019. On 8 October the law students underwent an advocacy boot camp which was a full training day on advocacy skills. The four law faculties participated in a preliminary round on 9 October. The top two, Great Zimbabwe University and Midlands State University qualified for the final round. The winning team, Great Zimbabwe University will participate in the All Africa Moot Court Competitions which brings together IHL national champions from all over Africa.
The competition was supported by the European Union.
Contact
Arnold Tsunga, t: +26377728 3248; e: arnold.tsunga(a)icj.org
Rumbidzai Muyendesi, t: +263771666579; e: rumbidzai.muyendesi(a)icj.org
Oct 7, 2019 | Artículos, Noticias
La semana pasada el defensor de derechos humanos Germán Romero Sánchez recibió nuevas amenazas que estarían relacionadas con su labor de abogado defensor de víctimas de graves violaciones a los derechos humanos por parte de agentes estatales
En esta ocasión, las amenazas se realizaron a través de llamadas telefónicas a la residencia del abogado Romero. La primera llamada fue atendida por la compañera del abogado Romero a la cual le dijeron “no te voy a dejar vivo toda la vida, ¿oyo?”. La llamada se produjo minutos después de que el abogado Romero saliera de su casa a llevar a una de sus hijas al colegio.
Esta no es la primera vez que el abogado Romero recibe amenazas por su labor como representante de víctimas y defensor de derechos humanos. Hace menos de un mes, el abogado Romero realizó una denuncia pública dando cuenta de varios hechos de hostigamiento y percusión de los que ha sido víctima él y su familia. Igualmente, en enero de este año, recibió amenazas contra su vida por su labor como abogado defensor de Alfamir Castillo, cuyo hijo fue ejecutado extrajudicialmente por parte de miembros del Ejército Nacional.
El abogado Romero es un reconocido abogado de derechos humanos con más de quince años de experiencia acompañando víctimas de crímenes de Estado. Es uno de los abogados líderes de la organización Asociación Red de Defensores y Defensoras de Derechos Humanos (dhColombia) con la cual la CIJ ha realizado diferentes proyectos en Colombia.
Como lo hizo en oportunidades pasadas, la CIJ vuelve a resaltar la difícil situación de seguridad que atraviesan los defensores de derechos humanos en Colombia. Solo en el año 2018, la Oficina en Colombia de la Alta Comisionada de las Naciones Unidas para los Derechos Humanos reportó el asesinato de 110 personas defensoras de derechos humanos. La CIJ exhorta al Gobierno Nacional y las demás autoridades competentes para que se tomen medidas efectivas que garanticen la seguridad de los defensores de derechos humanos colombianos.
