Jan 26, 2024 | News
The ICJ welcomes today’s near-unanimous Order of the International Court of Justice (the Court) in the case of South Africa v. Israel, indicating provisional measures under the 1948 Genocide Convention (the Convention).
“Through this Order, the world’s highest judicial authority has acknowledged that there is a risk of genocide being committed in Gaza,” said Said Benarbia, MENA Programme Director of the International Commission of Jurists. “It is now incumbent on Israel to implement the provisional measures – as well as its obligations under the United Nations Charter – as a matter of urgency.”
In its Order delivered orally in The Hague following oral submissions by South Africa and Israel on 11 and 12 January 2024 respectively, the Court found it had prima facie jurisdiction over the case and indicated six (6) provisional measures.
The Court ordered that Israel: (1) take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of all acts within the scope of Article II(a)-(d) of the Convention; (2) ensure with immediate effect that its military does not commit any acts described in the first order; (3) take effective measures to prevent the destruction and ensure the preservation of evidence related to allegations of acts within the scope of Article II and Article III of the Convention; and (4) report to the Court on all measures taken to give effect to the Order within one month of the Order.
The Court also ordered that Israel take all measures within its power to prevent and punish the direct and public incitement to commit genocide against people in Gaza, and enable the provision of urgently needed basic services and humanitarian assistance. The Court also reminded all parties of their obligations under international humanitarian law, and called for the release of hostages.
The ICJ notes that at the provisional measures stage, the Court does not determine the merits of the case. It therefore has yet to make a determination whether Israel has committed, sanctioned, or incited genocide in violation of the Genocide Convention. A hearing on the merits will be held at a later stage. Furthermore, the role of the Court is to establish the legal responsibility of States, not individuals, in accordance with international law. The determination of the responsibility of any individuals that might be responsible for genocide would fall to the International Criminal Court (ICC), which is presently investigating allegations of international crimes committed by both parties.
This unequivocal call by the Court – a principal organ of the United Nations – for Israel to take all effective measures to prevent the commission of genocide highlights the crucial importance of swift and decisive action by the international community to: i) as previously urged by the International Commission of Jurists, ensure an immediate ceasefire and ensure the release of hostages, and ii) cease aid or assistance to Israel that may facilitate the commission of acts that may amount to genocide or undermine all States’ obligations under the Convention to prevent genocide.
“As the number of Palestinians killed in Gaza since 7 October surpasses 25,000 and continues to mount, the need for international cooperation to enforce these legally binding provisional measures cannot be overstated”, added Banarbia. “Respect for international law, including the Genocide Convention and its preventive function, demands no less”.
Notwithstanding the Order, the ICJ reiterates that individuals from all parties to the conflict, including Israel and Hamas, must be held criminally accountable for any violations of international criminal law committed since 7 October and all States should refrain from providing assistance to any party to the conflict that may amount to complicity in such criminal acts, including by imposing an arms embargo. The ICJ also urges States to support the work of the ICC and the Independent Commission of Inquiry, and, where possible, exercise universal jurisdiction over crimes under international law.
Contact:
Said Benarbia, Director, ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, email: said.benarbia@icj.org
Katherine Iliopoulos, Legal Adviser, ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, email: katherine.iliopoulos@icj.org
Jan 25, 2024 | Advocacy, Joint Statement
The ICJ has joined more than a hundred organizations and experts in a call on the state delegations that will participate in the concluding session of the United Nations Ad Hoc Committee elaborating a proposed Cybercrime Convention (the Convention) to ensure the Convention is narrowly focused on tackling cybercrime, and not used as a tool to undermine human rights.
It is the ICJ’s view that the fight against cybercrime should not come at the expense of human rights, gender equality, and the dignity of the people whose lives will be affected by this Convention. It should not result in impeding security research and making us all less secure.
Robust and meaningful safeguards and limitations are essential to avoid the possibility of abuse of relevant provisions of the Convention that could arise under the guise of combating cybercrime. Absent meaningful changes to address these shortcomings, the Convention should be rejected.
Read the full Statement:
Joint Advocacy Statement on UN Cybercrime Convention
Dec 21, 2023 | News
On 18 December 2023, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) filed a submission to the Human Rights Committee (the Committee) on Tunisia’s implementation of the Committee’s 2020 concluding observations regarding the Constitutional Court and the use of counter-terrorism provisions in the context of the Committee’s follow-up procedure.
“Since July 2021, President Kais Said has systematically eroded all checks on his authority, including by curtailing the powers of the Constitutional Court under the 2022 Constitution and by instigating arbitrary prosecutions against those suspected of opposing his rule , including judges, journalists, human rights defenders, and political opponents,” said Said Benarbia, ICJ MENA director. “The Tunisian authorities must abide by their obligations under international law, immediately reinstate a democratic constitutional order, and end the use of the criminal process and counter-terrorism measures to crackdown on dissent and free speech.”
In April 2022, pursuant to the Committees’ request to the State party to provide follow-up information on the implementation of its recommendations regarding the Constitutional Court, the state of emergency and counter-terrorism, and freedom of peaceful assembly and excessive use of force by the State’s agents, Tunisia submitted further information regarding its obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) as they pertain to the above-mentioned concerns. During the Committee’s 140th session between 4 and 28 March 2024, this information, and Tunisia’s implementation of the Committee’s recommendations on the same, will be reviewed.
The ICJ’s submission to the Committee highlights a number of ongoing human rights concerns with respect to the country’s implementation of and compliance with the provisions of ICCPR, which are not adequately addressed in the State’s submission of further information, including:
- Article 2(3). By failing to establish a Constitutional Court, and by severely limiting the independence and powers of the Constitutional Court under the new Constitution – should one ever be established – Tunisia has failed to provide recourse to resolve disputes about the constitutionality of the exceptional decrees promulgated by the President under the state of exception, including by removing the power of the legislature to challenge the constitutionality of such decrees in the new Constitution;
.
- Article 4(1) and (3). By failing to specify the nature of the public emergency that purportedly necessitated the suspension of the Constitution in July 2021 per article 80 of the 2014 Constitution on state of exception, and the corollary interference with ICCPR rights, and by failing to notify the derogation to these rights, Tunisia has failed to meet its obligations to prove and ensure that the exceptional measures adopted by the President were “strictly required by the exigencies of the situation”;
.
- Article 9(1). By arbitrarily detaining perceived political opponents, lawyers or judges under counter-terrorism provisions without reliable evidence, Tunisia is unlawfully interfering with their right to liberty;
.
- Article 19 (1) and (3). By arbitrarily investigating and prosecuting members of the judiciary, political opponents and lawyers under counter-terrorism provisions, Tunisia is unlawfully interfering with their right to express their opinions both in their professional and personal capacity; and
.
- Article 14(1). Through interference in the appointment, career, disciplining and dismissal of judges, prosecutors and High Judicial Council members, the President has undermined the independence and impartiality of tribunals presiding over criminal investigations and prosecutions, including with respect to counter-terrorism proceedings against perceived political opponents and members of the judiciary.
Contact
Said Benarbia, Director, ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, t: +41-22-979-3800; e: said.benarbia(a)icj.org
Dec 14, 2023
On 14 December 2023, the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) filed a submission for the preparation by the UN Human Rights Committee of a List of Issues (LOI) for the examination of Viet Nam’s fourth periodic report under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
During its 140th session, from 4 to 28 March 2024, the Human Rights Committee will prepare and adopt a LOI featuring a number of questions addressed to the State party.
Once adopted, the LOI will be transmitted to the State party. Replies to the LOIs are to be provided in writing before the dialogue between the Committee and Viet Nam’s delegation that will take place during the Committee’s review of the State party’s implementation of and compliance with the provisions of the ICCPR at a forthcoming session of the Committee.
The ICJ’s submission to the Committee highlights a number of ongoing human rights concerns with respect to the country’s implementation of and compliance with the provisions of the ICCPR, which are not adequately addressed in State’s report.
In addition, the submission formulates certain questions and recommends that the Committee should include them in its LOI and address them to the Government of Viet Nam, including on the following pressing human rights concerns:
- The right to freedom of expression and information and to privacy (articles 19 and 17);
- The death penalty (articles 6 and 7);
- The independence of the judiciary and the right to a fair trial (article 14); and
- The right to an effective remedy (article 2(3)).
The submission is available in PDF here.
Nov 1, 2023 | Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, Legal submissions, News, Treaty Bodies, Work with the UN
The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) made a submission to the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination in view of the Committee’s examination of the Combined Ninth to Eleventh Periodic Reports of South Africa under Article 9 of the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD). The submission focussed primarily on the treatment of non-citizens with reference to the 2019 National Action Plan and on South Africa’s violations of the right to access health care and treatment, the right to work, as well as on concerns around residence and humanitarian protection for Zimbabweans.
The following are among some of the recommendations featured in the submission, which ICJ addressed to the South African government, to tackle a number of violations of the ICERD:
- Enact legislation that permits trained attorneys who are non-citizen/non-permanent residents to be admitted into the South African legal profession. Remove unequal practices and policies that discriminate against non-citizens and deny or undermine their ability to work in their chosen profession. Promote and advance the rights to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favorable conditions of work, to protection against unemployment, to equal pay for equal work, to just and favorable remuneration;
- Acknowledge that, based on the demographics of South Africa’s migration trends, discrimination based on national origin and citizenship status carries a quality of xenophobia and racial discrimination and should be recognized as unconstitutional and a violation of South Africa’s obligations under the Convention;
- Halt the termination of the ZEP programme and institute a pathway toward permanent residency for the 178,000 Zimbabweans who have lived and worked in South Africa for over a decade under the ZEP programme; and
- Extend the ruling that found denying access to public healthcare for non-citizen mothers, lactating mothers and children under the age of six is unconstitutional so as to ensure that denial of access to public healthcare to any individual in South Africa is unconstitutional;
- Formalize the informal economy by ensuring that informal economy workers are catered for under labour, occupational health and safety, social protection and non-discrimination laws;
- Ensure that by-laws and regulations comply with the right to work and the right to non-discrimination in the South African Constitution and under the Convention.
The following organizations have endorsed this submission:
- Lawyers for Human Rights
- Section 27
- Centre for Applied Legal Studies
- Health Justice Initiative
- Kopanang Africa Against Xenophobia
- Solidarity Centre
- The Consortium for Refugees and Migrants in Southern Africa.
Download the submission
