At the time the detention order was issued, the individual did not possess an identity document, and such a document was later issued under unclear factual circumstances. The personal data of the foreign national were recorded following an interview conducted in a non-native language that the individual did not speak proficiently. As a result, the exact age of the foreign national was not established. In violation of Article 44, paragraph 9 of the Law on Foreigners, an unaccompanied minor was forcibly placed under the authority of the State Migration Service. The court therefore annulled the immigration detention order.
Source here.