EU: Briefing paper on proposed directive on presumption of Innocence

EU: Briefing paper on proposed directive on presumption of Innocence

The ICJ, JUSTICE and NJCM have published their analysis of the proposed EU directive on the presumption of innocence, and made recommendations for amendments, to ensure its compliance with international human rights law.

The briefing paper welcomes the aim of the initiative of the Commission’s proposed directive, to protect both the presumption of innocence and the right to be present at trial in EU law.  However, it notes there are some aspects of the Commission proposal that  should be strengthened.  The ICJ, JUSTICE and NJCM also raise concerns that some of the amendments proposed by the Council in its General Approach would unduly limit the rights guaranteed in the Directive, so that they offer less protection than that provided under international human rights law, including the ECHR, in accordance with the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights. 

ICJJUSTICENJCM-Briefing-EU-PresumptionofInnocenceDirective-LegalIntervention-2015-ENG (download the legal briefing)

Joint intervention in case of immigration detention of mother and children

Joint intervention in case of immigration detention of mother and children

The ICJ, the European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) and the AIRE Centre submitted a thirty party intervention before the European Court of Human Rights in the case of the immigration detention of a mother with her children in Poland.

The case, Dagmara Bilalova v. Poland, concerned the detention for purpose of deportation of a Russian citizen from Chechnya, Dagmara Bilalova, and her five children. According to the statement of facts of the case, Dagmara Bilalova was also allegedly subjected to domestic violence from her husband, who had been previously deported to the Russian Federation. She and her children were deported to the Russian Federation on 27 March 2014.

The three human rights organisations submitted observations on standards and principles of international and EU law regarding:

  • the requirements for the compliance of administrative detention of non-national families with children, with article 5.1 of the ECHR, and with UN treaties, standards and jurisprudence in particular relating to the Convention on the Rights of the Child;
  • the international law, standards and jurisprudence applicable to the victims of domestic violence and their administrative detention in the framework of migration law and policies;
  • EU, national and international law applicable to the identification and treatment of asylum seekers with special reception needs.

ECtHR-AmicusBrief-Bilalova v Poland-Advocacy-Legal Submission-2015-ENG (download the third party intervention)

Council of Europe: ICJ and AI observations on draft foreign fighters protocol negotiations

Council of Europe: ICJ and AI observations on draft foreign fighters protocol negotiations

The ICJ and Amnesty International have submitted public observations on the terms of reference to draft an Additional Protocol supplementing the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism.

In the letter containing their observations, the ICJ and AI outlined before the Committee on Foreign Terrorist Fighters and Related Issues (COD-CTE) of the Council of Europe the general principles of human rights law related to the issue of foreign fighters and the implementation of Security Council resolution 2178(2014) and made observations on specific acts the criminalization of which was explicitly mandated by the Committee of Ministers. The two human rights organisations expressed their concern at the lack of publicity of the negotiations and public availability of the draft protocol which impeded a punctual and effective process of consultations and observations on the negotiated text.

The letter outlines positions and concerns with relation to:

  • The lack of definition of central concepts like “terrorism”, “terrorist acts”, and “foreign fighters”
  • The risk of introducing criminal offences lacking the clarity, accessibility and foreseeability required by the principle of legality
  • The risk of conflation of of different legal regimes, notably of international humanitarian law and ordinary criminal law
  • The need to investigate and prosecute existing crimes under international law
  • The need to ensure that any criminalisation of acts or omissions must have a close connection to the commission of the principal criminal offence, with a real risk that such a principal criminal act would in fact take place
  • The proposed criminal offences of being recruited and receiving training for terrorism, and their ancillary offences.

CouncilofEurope-Letter-ForeignFighters-Advocacy-Legal Submission-2015-ENG (download the observations)

joint statement on reports by Independent Experts on Human Rights and the Environment and on Foreign Debt

joint statement on reports by Independent Experts on Human Rights and the Environment and on Foreign Debt

The ICJ supported a statement commenting on the respective reports by the Independent Expert on the Environment and Human Rights and the Independent Expert on Foreign Debt and its impact on Human Rights.

In the context of the Interactive Dialogue with the Independent Experts in the 28th Session of the Human Rights Council, Franciscans International and the Center of Concern, with the support of the ICJ, noted that the reports address, from different perspectives, a wide range of connections between the private sector and governments that many times result in human rights abuses.

The report by the Independent Expert on human rights and the environment, presented an encouraging set of good practices to mitigate environmental damage and its human rights impact.

The report by the Independent Expert on Foreign Debt and its impact on human rights highlighted the links between private lending and the abuses committed by authoritarian regimes.

This report will be followed by another report on applicable legal standards and analysis of whether additional international standards are needed.

Universal-Statement on BHR at HRC28-Advocacy-2015-ENG (full text in PDF)

Translate »