Rights of judicial proceedings’ participants must be protected in Tunisia following COVID-19 lockdown

Rights of judicial proceedings’ participants must be protected in Tunisia following COVID-19 lockdown

Tunisian authorities must protect the rights of the judiciary, the accused and other proceeding participants as judicial proceedings resume following COVID-19 lockdown, says the ICJ and Association des Magistrats Tunisiens in a briefing paper published today.

From 17 March 2020, the Tunisian President and executive authorities instituted exceptional measures to prevent and contain the spread of COVID-19, which included the suspension of judicial proceedings except for urgent matters, as well as work on all categories of cases by the prosecution, investigating judges and indictment chambers.

Subject to the Prime Minister’s national strategy, adopted on 2 May 2020, and a subsequent decision by the Minister of Justice, judicial proceedings are set to resume in full on 15 June 2020.

Prior to the adoption of a national strategy, the Prime Minister amended the Code of Criminal Procedure by Decree No. 2020-12 to permit remote hearings generally where the accused consents and, in situations of imminent danger or to prevent the contagion of a transmittable disease, irrespective of whether they consent.

Such developments raise concerns with respect to the modalities of proceedings and protection of all participants’ rights under international human rights law.

As Tunisia gradually lifts COVID-19 containment measures and judicial proceedings resume, Tunisian authorities must ensure that sufficient guarantees are put in place to protect the accused’s rights to liberty and a fair trial, victims’ right to an effective remedy and the judiciary and other proceeding participants’ rights to life, health and a safe and healthy working environment.

The briefing paper addresses these issues, submitting that:

  • Tunisian authorities must adopt protective measures to ensure the rights to life, health and a safe and healthy working environment for all proceeding participants;
  • Tunisian authorities should ensure remote hearings only occur where compliant with international law and standards governing criminal trials;
  • Courts should remain available for urgent matters pending the adoption of protective measures; and
  • Adjustments to the modalities of conducting trials should ensure the rights of the accused and victims are respected in Specialized Criminal Chambers’ proceedings.

Contact:

Kate Vigneswaran, Senior Legal Adviser, ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, t+31624894664 ;  e: kate.vigneswaran(a)icj.org;

Anas Hmedi, President, Association des Magistrats Tunisiens: t +21698242625 ; e: anashmedi(a)gmail.com

Tunisia- judicial proceedings pandemic-Advocacy-briefing paper-2020-ENG (full briefing paper in PDF)

Tunisia- judicial proceedings pandemic-Advocacy-briefing paper-2020-ARA (full briefing paper, Arabic version, in PDF)

 

COVID-19: Myanmar’s ongoing Internet shutdown and hostilities threaten right to health

COVID-19: Myanmar’s ongoing Internet shutdown and hostilities threaten right to health

Today, the ICJ published a briefing paper entitled “COVID-19 and Human Rights: Upholding the Right to Health in Myanmar’s Conflict Areas.”

The briefing paper analyzes the ongoing Internet shutdown in Rakhine and Chin states through a right to health lens amid the COVID-19 pandemic, and its impact on Myanmar’s obligation to uphold the right to health under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Myanmar became a party to the treaty in 2017.

The briefing paper also discusses the right to health and international humanitarian law implications of the attack against World Health Organization employees in Rakhine state in April 2020.

Questions answered include:

  1. What does the right to health guarantee?
  2. Who does the right to health protect?
  3. What are Myanmar’s obligations regarding the right to health?
  4. How is access to information important to upholding the right to health?
  5. Do these human rights obligations and protections apply in situations of armed conflict?
  6. How does the Internet shutdown in Rakhine and Chin states affect Myanmar’s obligation to uphold the right to health?
  7. What are the legal implications of attacks against medical personnel in areas of armed conflict?

Download

English

Burmese

Contact

Jenny Domino, ICJ Associate Legal Adviser, e: jenny.domino(a)icj.org

Related Work

Statement: Government must lift online restrictions in conflict-affected areas to ensure access to information during COVID-19

Report: Curtailing the Right to Freedom of Expression and Information in Myanmar

Publication: Questions and Answers on Human Rights Law in Rakhine State

Event: ICJ and Myanmar National Human Rights Commission Hold Forum on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights

India on the brink of Hunger Crisis during COVID-19 Pandemic, warns ICJ Briefing Paper

India on the brink of Hunger Crisis during COVID-19 Pandemic, warns ICJ Briefing Paper

The Indian government has fallen short of its obligations to guarantee the right to food during the COVID-19 pandemic, the ICJ said in a briefing paper released today.

India went into voluntary quarantine on March 22 2020 and then a nationwide lockdown from March 24 2020. The Indian authorities have indicated that the lockdown will continue until at least May 3 2020. Informal sector workers, and others, who ordinarily survive on meager and unreliable daily wages, have lost access to regular income since March 22 2020 and have, at best, limited access to government support.

The Global Hunger Index 2019 ranks India as suffering from a “level of hunger that is serious”. As a result of COVID-19, an estimated 400 million informal sector workers in India “are at risk of falling deeper into poverty during the crisis” according to the International Labour Organization. COVID-19 has resulted in loss of livelihood for millions of people in India. Its impact has been particularly acute for informal sector workers, many of whom are internal migrant workers. Existing vulnerabilities to food insecurity in India are compounded by long-standing social and structural discrimination based on caste, religion and gender. Several million persons, including informal sector workers living in deprived urban and rural areas lack access to adequate food, as well as information about the availability of community kitchens.

The ICJ has previously called on the Indian government to ensure the protection of the rights of internal migrant workers, many of whom are stranded in intolerable conditions.

The briefing paper published by the ICJ sets out in question and answer format some of the human rights concerns that have arisen from the lockdown in the context of right to food for people living in poverty. It answers the following questions:

  • What are the principal concerns regarding the right to food faced by people living in poverty in India since the COVID-19 lockdown started?
  • What are India’s legal obligations to guarantee the right to food?
  • What right to food issues does India’s COVID-19 response raise?
  • What does the International Commission of Jurists recommend?

Infographic

Download the Right to Food Infographic here.

Contact

Maitreyi Gupta, ICJ India Legal Adviser, t: +91 77 560 28369 e: maitreyi.gupta(a)icj.org

Frederick Rawski, ICJ Asia-Pacific Director, t: +66 64 478 1121; e: frederick.rawski(a)icj.org

Download

India-Right-to-Food-COVID19-Briefing-Paper-2020-ENG (PDF)

Translate »