UN submission highlights key principles on the right to challenge detention

UN submission highlights key principles on the right to challenge detention

The ICJ today submitted to the UN its recommendations for a draft set of “Basic Principles and Guidelines” on the right of anyone deprived of liberty to challenge the lawfulness of his or her detention, and the right of victims of arbitrary or unlawful detention to an effective remedy.

The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, which will meet in Geneva 13 to 22 November 2013, was requested last year by the Human Rights Council to prepare the draft “Principles and Guidelines” before the end of 2015. The ICJ submission responds to a call by the Working Group for input to the drafting process.

Among the key aspects highlighted by the ICJ submissions are:

  • the elements of an effective remedy for unlawful or arbitrary deprivation of liberty;
  • the requirement that anyone deprived of liberty for any reason have access to a proper court to seek release;
  • the broad grounds such courts must consider in determining whether the detention is lawful;
  • the requirement that the proceedings lead to a prompt decision that is actually implemented by the detaining authorities;
  • the right of the detainee to have confidential access to a lawyer of his or her choosing, promptly after arrest or detention;
  • the right of the detainee to be present for the proceedings;
  • necessary guarantees for the fairness of such proceedings, including that the person and his or her lawyer have access to the evidence and allegations on which the detention is based;
  • the right to challenge the lawfulness of detention continues to apply in situations of emergency.

UN-ICJ-WGAD68-SubmissionHabeas-advocacy-non-legal submission-2013 (full text in pdf)

Joint intervention in the case Abu Zubaydah v. Poland

Joint intervention in the case Abu Zubaydah v. Poland

The ICJ and Amnesty International presented a third party intervention in the case Abu Zubaydah v. Poland before the European Court of Human Rights.

In the third party intervention in this case on the alleged complicity of Polish authorities in the US-led operation that led to the rendition, secret detention and torture of Abu Zubaydah, the ICJ and AI outlined developments on the relevant knowledge imputable to Contracting Parties at the relevant time; the obligation to investigate and bring to justice the alleged perpetrators of gross violations of Convention Rights; the right to truth; and the right of the general public to know the truth and the application of the State secrets doctrine.

AbuZubaydah_v_Poland-AIICJThirdPartyIntervention-ECtHR-Final (download the third party intervention)

ICJ submission on Kyrgyzstan to the Committee against Torture

ICJ submission on Kyrgyzstan to the Committee against Torture

The ICJ has submitted to the Committee against Torture comments in advance of its consideration of the Second Periodic Report of Kyrgyzstan under the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT).

The ICJ submission focuses on concerns about the implementation by Kyrgyzstan of Articles 1, 2, 3, 4, 11, 12, 14, 15 and 16 of the CAT concerning:

a) failure to prevent torture and other ill-treatment of persons in detention;

b) application of the definition of the crime of torture and its implications;

c) failure to ensure and respect the right of detainees of access to a lawyer;

d) failure to ensure independent, impartial and thorough investigation of acts of torture and other ill-treatment; and

e) failure to respect the prohibition of the use of evidence obtained under torture or other ill-treatment.

Finally, the submission addresses the failure of the authorities to ensure reparation to victims of torture and other ill-treatment, including that which should result from findings of violations by UN treaty bodies.

Kyrgyzstan- CAT51-Legal submission-2013 (download the submission in pdf)

Translate »