Oct 10, 2013
Today, the International Commission of Jurists and the Open Society Justice Initiative submitted a third party intervention before the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Gîrleanu v. Romania.
Marian Gîrleanu was journalist fined for having been in information considered confidential by the Romania state authorities concerning international involvement in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. The information was never published. In their intervention, the ICJ and OSJI submit that sanctions for unauthorized possession or disclosure of information by journalists and other similarly protected persons may seriously impair their rights under Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights right to receive and impart information, and may only be applied in very exceptional circumstances. The two human rights organizations stress that it is the State, not journalists, that is responsible for the protection of government information. Journalists and other who perform a public watchdog function that is fundamental to a democratic to a democratic society may not be subject to sanctions for possession or disclosure in the public interest of information.
ECtHR-ThirdPartyIntervention-Girlenau-Romania-2013 (Read the third party intervention)
Sep 26, 2013
The ICJ today called on the UN Human Rights Council to prepare to take action in March 2014 if the Government of Sri Lanka continues to fail to take concrete steps to ensure justice and accountability.
In response to an oral update of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on her mission to Sri Lanka and the implementation of Human Rights Council resolution 22/1 on promoting reconciliation and accountability in Sri Lanka, the ICJ expressed deep concern that critical measures on accountability, such as those called for in the resolution, are not being adequately implemented. Noting that the High Commissioner will present a comprehensive report to the Council during the 25th session of the Council in March 2014, the ICJ called on Council members to be ready to act in order to ensure justice and accountability for alleged gross violations of international human rights law and serious violations of international humanitarian law in Sri Lanka.
The statement was made in a General Debate under item 10 of the Council’s agenda during the 24th regular session of the Council (9 to 27 September 2013).
SriLanka-HRC24-Item10-OralStatementGD-LegalSubmission-2013 (download full statement in PDF)
Sep 23, 2013
The ICJ today called on Nepal to take urgent steps to implement recommendations on ending impunity accepted by the country during its first cycle Universal Periodic Review (UPR) in 2011.
In a General Debate under Item 6 of the Human Rights Council’s agenda (UPR), the ICJ pointed to Nepal’s failure to take concrete action to implement recommendations accepted by the country during its 2011 UPR as now visibly destabilising the country. It called on Nepal to take urgent measures to:
- Ensure that the truth and reconciliation commission, and a separate ‘disappearances’ commission to be established, conform fully with international standards including by precluding amnesty for gross human rights violations;
- Ensure that human rights violations constituting crimes under international law are recognised as distinct criminal offences under Nepali law; and
- Immediately commit to implement relevant Supreme Court rulings within a clearly stipulated time.
Nepal’s first cycle UPR took place in 2011. The Government of Nepal adopted a UPR implementation plan in 2012. The implementation plan failed, however, to set out timeframes for implementation or establish means to measure progress.
The General Debate took place during the 24th regular session of the Human Rights Council (9 to 27 September 2013).
Nepal-HRC24-Item6-OralStatementGD-LegalSubmission-2013 (download full statement in PDF)
Sep 20, 2013
The ICJ today called on the Russian Federation to reconsider its position on rejected UPR recommendations and take measures for effective implementation of accepted recommendations concerning human rights and the rule of law in the country.
In an Interactive Dialogue on the adoption of the second cycle Universal Periodic Review of the Russian Federation (Item 6 of the Human Rights Council’s agenda), the ICJ called on the Russian Government to:
- Establish, in legislation, clear and predictable grounds for disciplinary action against judges, and ensure impartial arbitration;
- Ensure the right of all detainees to prompt and regular access to a lawyer;
- Amend the law on NGO activities to protect against its arbitrary application; and
- Adopt comprehensive anti-discrimination legislation that includes sexual orientation and gender identity as protected grounds.
The Interactive Dialogue took place during the 24th regular session of the Human Rights Council (9 to 27 September 2013).
Russia-HRC24-Item6-OralStatement-LegalSubmission-2013 (download full statement in English)
ICJ submission and advocacy on the Universal Periodic Review of the Russian Federation
Sep 19, 2013
The ICJ today called on Canada to enact an effective legal framework for accountability of Canadian extractive industries and to reconsider its rejection of other UPR recommendations.
In an Interactive Dialogue on the adoption of the second cycle Universal Periodic Review of Canada (Item 6 of the Human Rights Council’s agenda), the ICJ reiterated its concern regarding the human rights impacts of Canadian business enterprises, in particular mining, gas and oil companies, in countries where they operate. It also called on Canada to reconsider its position not to accept UPR recommendations to become party to several key international human rights instruments.
The Interactive Dialogue took place during the 24th regular session of the Human Rights Council (9 to 27 September 2013).
Canada-HRC24-Item6-OralStatement-LegalSubmission-2013 (download full statement in PDF)
ICJ submission and advocacy on the Universal Periodic Review of Canada
