Nov 3, 2019 | News
Bangkok, Thailand – From 1 to 2 November 2019, ICJ in collaboration with the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and the Ralph Bunche Institute for International Studies, hosted a consultation on gender and the right to freedom of religion or belief with the UN Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Religion or Belief, Dr. Ahmed Shaheed.
The primary objective of the consultation was to provide a forum for human rights defenders, particularly women and human rights defenders belonging to sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression and sex characteristics (SOGIESC) minorities to share their perspectives on laws, practices and anti-rights strategies based on religion or belief that discriminate against women and SOGI groups and individuals in Asia. The consultation was attended by at least fifty-two (52) human rights defenders from all over Asia.
Emerlynne Gil, ICJ’s Senior International Legal Adviser, in her opening address, emphasized that gender equality and the right to freedom of religion or belief should not be viewed as inimical to each other. She said, “Women and individuals belonging to sexual orientation and gender identity minorities should also be able to being to a faith or religion of their choice, or religion into which they are born and they should continue to belong to the religion or belief without being discriminated against by the faith or religious community.”
The consultation included discussions on the domestic contexts and legal frameworks in relation to freedom of religion and the rights of women and SOGIESC minorities, including in relation to the right to health. The participants considered challenges faced by women and SOGIESEC minorities when religious leaders act as justice actors were also discussed. The consultation, while highlighting the good practices in advancing the rights of women and SOGIESC minorities, also explored existing challenges and tensions in respect of achieving gender equality.
At the conclusion of the consultation, Dr. Shaheed noted the diversity of the participants in the room, who came from all over Asia. He emphasized that “in order to engage more effectively and strategically, it is imperative that we improve our literacy in relation to the human rights framework and of religion in order to better understand its intersectionality.”
Contact
Sushmitha Thayanandan, National Legal Advisor, Sri Lanka (ICJ) e: sushmitha.thayanandan(a)icj.org
Nov 1, 2019 | News, Op-eds
An opinion editorial by Shaazia Ebrahim, Communications Consultant for ICJ’s Africa Programme.
Nomfundo Ngobese (25) was used to waking up at 4am to walk the 35km from her home in Nquthu, northern KwaZulu Natal (KZN) to school. In the blistering heat and the freezing cold, crossing rivers and sometimes dodging rain and lightning, Ngobese, was like many South African school learners who walked for hours to get to and from school each day.
“We had to wake up past 4 so that at past 5 we can go to school. In winters when we had to go to school, it was dark. We didn’t feel safe… We didn’t even realise the difficulties our smaller siblings were facing. It’s a thing that we just got used to,” Ngobese said.
While learners all over South Africa walk for hours every day to get to school and back home, KZN has the greatest need for scholar transport. According to the 2016 General Household Survey done by Statistics South Africa, some 483 633 learners in KZN walk more than half an hour in one direction to school each day.
But the end of the battle for learners with similar experiences to Ngobese could be in sight.
On October 23, Ngobese joined other Equal Education (EE) post-school youth organisers in picketing outside the Pietermaritzburg High Court. EE, represented by the Equal Education Law Centre (EELC), had sued the KZN Department of Education (DoE) to court to force the government into releasing the provincial scholar transport policy, which should have been available in December 2018.
They emerged victorious when government committed to releasing its Scholar Transport Policy for public comment by 31 January next year. Should the KZN DoE fail to comply, it will have to answer to the courts. The release of this policy is a critical step in ensuring that more learners will be able to have access to school transportation.
EE has been working to achieve free and safe scholar transport in Nquthu since 2014, after Equalisers told EE about the difficulties they faced with scholar transport. Learners highlighted the challenges they faced walking very far distances in extreme heat and in thunderstorms, and crossing rivers and mountains, at great risk of violent crime including sexual assault. Many learners said they felt tired and hungry after the long walk, and could not concentrate properly in class or perform well at school.
“I was once an Equaliser myself and I once walked to school every morning and afternoon,” Palisa Motloung (21) said. “We were never sure what’s going to happen on those routes. I remember this one time when I was walking with my friend, and then we passed a bush and there were men there talking. We couldn’t tell if they were talking on this side or that side of the fence because it was dark. It was very scary, we literally had to run. It was quite an experience and I don’t wish any child should go through that,” Motloung said.
After local visits to schools in Nquthu in 2014 and 2015, EE wrote to the KZN Department of Transport (DoT) and KZN DoE about these hardships learners were facing, and requested information about how they were providing scholar transport in the province. Governments’ replies were unsatisfactory, with the DoE responding that it found that only one of the 12 schools EE discussed qualified for scholar transport.
After long back and forth with government, who provided scholar transport in dribs and drabs, EE found that there was still a desperate need for scholar transport. Government officials claimed that five of the 12 schools did not qualify for scholar transport because learners were not attending the schools closest to their homes. They conceded that seven of the 12 schools did qualify for scholar transport, but said there was no money to provide it. EE took the matter to court.
This is not the first time that a provincial department of education has sued in South Africa for a failure to provide transport for learners. In 2015 the Judge Plasket of the Eastern Cape High Court held in a similar case that “The right to education is meaningless without … transport to and from school at state expense”.
The initial case was set to be heard at the Pietermaritzburg High Court. But before the hearing began, the lawyers representing EE and the lawyers representing the KZN government entered into negotiations with the KZN DoE and KZN DoT made certain promises. The order granted by the Pietermaritzburg High Court stated that the KZN DoE promised to provide scholar transport to learners in the 12 Nquthu schools by 1 April 2018.
While this was a momentous victory for EE, as part of ongoing court processes, the organisation filed a response to the KZN DoE report to the court, recognising the important steps that it had taken, but also noting significant gaps that remain.
The EE urged the KZN DoE in June last year to provide clear timelines for the finalisation of its scholar transport policy. This is a crucial step to clarify which learners qualify for government-subsidised scholar transport, how the KZN DoE and the KZN DoT will work together to provide scholar transport, and how learners’ safety will be ensured.
This report has been delayed for over a year now, but if the decision of the Court is to be implemented, it will be released in January next year.
After coaxing from South African civil society, including EE, The National Learner Transport Policy was finally published in October 2015. The policy contains important scholar transport guidelines and principles that provinces should adhere to. However, while this policy has been finalised, it has yet to be adopted.
The government’s failure to provide learners with transport is a violation of the right to basic education which is protected under the South African Constitution and international law. The International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights, which South Africa ratified makes clear that education must be free for all learners at a primary school level and should progressively be made free for all learners at all levels.
Free education includes not only the absence of fees but also all other costs include free, reliable and safe transport. This means learners have a right to access their schools safely, and on time, so that they can use their energy to concentrate in class. For many learners in South Africa this is impossible without government funded transport.
“Most of the time, [schoolchildren] wake up very early and they get to school very hungry and tired. This affects their school percentage, the pass rate of the school also gets affected because of the long kilometers that children have to walk to school,” Sanele Zulu (22) said.
“I walked to school but I didn’t even know it was a wrong thing to do until Equal Education came and opened our minds. Even our parents didn’t know it was wrong, they thought that because in the olden days they walked long distances, so we must get used to it. But when EE came to our rural village, something went off in our eyes and we saw things in a different way,” Ngobese said.
Reflecting on their own experiences during school Ngobese, Motloung, and Zulu, continue to use their voices for learners who walk long distances to go to school. Equal Education, with the legal assistance of EELC, continues to advocate for the rights of learners in KwaZulu-Natal and all over South Africa.
Even though the persistent delays in the development and implementation of government policies to facilitate free, safe transport to and from schools is a cause for concern, learner’s faith in the judicial system and rights-based advocacy should be a source of optimism about the future of constitutional democracy in South Africa.
This op-ed was originally published in the Mail & Guardian.
Oct 31, 2019 | Editorial, Noticias
Una opinión editorial de Alejandro Salinas Rivera, Comisionado chileno de la CIJ
La desigualdad social, la desconfianza en las instituciones públicas y la falta de goce efectivo de los derechos económicos y sociales, son las raíces de las recientes protestas en Chile.
Los orígenes de las protestas reflejan tres problemas estructurales del modelo político y social del Estado chileno: la desigualdad social a pesar del éxito económico del país, la desconfianza en las instituciones públicas, y la insuficiente capacidad del Estado para garantizar los derechos económicos y sociales.
Además, el país enfrenta frustraciones que quedaron desde la época de la dictadura, y problemas que se han evidenciado durante la época democrática.
En efecto, los derechos no están garantizados de manera uniforme para toda la población chilena. Por ejemplo, algunas personas acceden a servicios de salud que son similares a aquéllos proporcionados en países desarrollados, mientras que otras acceden a servicios de muy baja calidad.
También, la educación se garantiza de manera desigual: la educación pública es costosa y las tasas universitarias son muy altas para la mayoría de la población.
Además, las municipalidades están clasificados entre ricas y pobres, y la infraestructura y la calidad de las carreteras cambian según el barrio. ¿Es todo esto justo? No. Entonces, ¿por qué hay tantas desigualdades entre la población chilena?
Este contexto ha generado que la ciudadanía no confíe en que las instituciones públicas garantizarán sus derechos, y la desesperanza ha impregnado a muchas personas.
Protestas sociales actuales: ¿qué se puede hacer?
Desde hace unas semanas Chile vive un estallido de protesta social. El hecho desencadenante fue el anuncio del 6 de octubre por parte del gobierno chileno de aumentar los precios del metro de Santiago; pero, las protestas están relacionadas con la desigualdad social y la desconfianza en las instituciones públicas.
Después de ese anuncio gubernamental, algunas personas, principalmente estudiantes, evadieron continuamente el pago de las tarifas del metro, y las fuerzas policiales (Carabineros) fueron enviadas para detener dicha evasión.
Así, las acciones de evasión escalaron, y en la noche del 18 de octubre, surgieron masivamente protestas sociales en diferentes ciudades del país que, aún hoy, no han cesado.
La respuesta inicial del presidente Sebastián Piñera fue decretar un estado de emergencia, un toque de queda y desplegar a las fuerzas militares a algunas calles.
Frente a esto, los manifestantes aumentaron y las protestas continuaron y se expandieron a distintas regiones del país.
Se han presentado serias denuncias sobre el uso excesivo de la fuerza por parte de las fuerzas policiales, así como, posibles detenciones arbitrarias ocurridas durante las manifestaciones. Esto requiere que el Estado chileno, en cumplimiento de estándares internacionales, realice una investigación adecuada y efectiva y si la evidencia lo amerita, enjuicie a los responsables.
Por otro lado, si bien la mayoría de protestas han sido pacíficas, algunos manifestantes han cometido actos violentos. Esto no deslegitima la protesta social, pero es necesario que se rechace esta violencia.
Ahora bien, después de más de 13 días de protestas sociales, el gobierno no ha podido generar las condiciones requeridas para concretar un pacto político y social que incluya otras fuerzas políticas, y le permita solucionar de manera adecuada la crisis. Las fuerzas de oposición política, además, tampoco han sido suficientemente generosas en este caso.
Asimismo, la sociedad civil debe brindar alternativas para abordar esta crisis.
En suma, debe haber una solución política que enfrente las raíces de las protestas. Los políticos deben reconocer el descontento social y enfrentarlo a pesar de sus diferencias. Deben converger en un acuerdo social y político que responda, con urgencia, a las demandas sociales en materia de equidad, justicia y solidaridad, así como, a la necesidad de aumentar la confianza en las instituciones públicas.
Por último, los políticos y las instituciones públicas deben garantizar los derechos económicos y sociales de la población, para lo cual, es necesario adoptar las reformas legales requeridas y promulgar políticas públicas que permitan superar la desigualdad social.
Oct 31, 2019 | Artículos, Noticias
Los días 29 y 30 de octubre, la CIJ, en asocio con dhColombia y el Equipo Argentino de Antropología Forense (EAAF), organizó una capacitación sobre el marco legal sobre la desaparición forzada y las ejecuciones extrajudiciales en Bogotá (Colombia).
La capacitación tuvo como objetivo mejorar la comprensión de víctimas y abogados de derechos humanos sobre la legislación nacional sobre ejecuciones extrajudiciales y desapariciones forzadas en Colombia. La capacitación incluyó un análisis del sistema de justicia ordinario y de los mecanismos de justicia transicional. También exploró el papel de las ciencias forenses en la lucha contra la impunidad de esos crímenes.
La CIJ, en cumplimiento de su objetivo de promover la rendición de cuentas, la justicia y el estado de derecho en Colombia, ha estado monitoreando continuamente la investigación y el enjuiciamiento de violaciones y abusos graves de los derechos humanos, en particular las ejecuciones extrajudiciales y las desapariciones forzadas. Los autores de tales violaciones, que constituyen crímenes de derecho internacional, han disfrutado de un alto nivel de impunidad. Hay numerosos casos sin resolver que datan de la década de 1970 y las violaciones han continuado incluso después de la firma del Acuerdo Final de Paz en 2016.
En Colombia, lograr la rendición de cuentas por esos crímenes ha resultado difícil por varias razones, incluido el funcionamiento ineficaz del sistema de justicia. Las víctimas y sus abogados han enfrentado serios obstáculos para acceder a recursos efectivos. Además, la creación de nuevas instituciones por el Acuerdo Final de Paz ha cambiado algunas reglas y procedimientos básicos para la investigación y el enjuiciamiento de esos crímenes. En consecuencia, el sistema de justicia colombiano es más complicado de entender, no solo para las víctimas sino también para los abogados.
El taller de capacitación fue parte de un proyecto regional más amplio que aborda la justicia por ejecuciones extrajudiciales y desapariciones forzadas en Colombia, Guatemala y Perú. Los participantes fueron víctimas y abogados de derechos humanos de diferentes regiones del país, especialmente aquellos lugares donde hay menos oportunidades de acceder a capacitación legal y forense. Teniendo en cuenta que las actividades de creación de capacidad son esenciales para el logro efectivo de la rendición de cuentas, se espera que los participantes de la capacitación hayan obtenido herramientas valiosas para exigir justicia y reparación por violaciones graves de los derechos humanos.
Contactos:
Rocío Quintero M, Asesora Legal, América Latina. Correo electrónico: rocio.quintero(a)icj.org
Carolina Villadiego, Asesora Legal, América Latina y coordinadora regional del proyecto. Correo Electrónico: carolina.villadiego(a)icj.org
Oct 31, 2019 | News
On 29-30 October the ICJ, in partnership with dhColombia and the Argentine Forensic Anthropology Team (EAAF), hosted a two-day training workshop in Bogotá on the legal framework around enforced disappearance and extrajudicial killings.
The training aimed to improve the understanding of victims and human rights lawyers of the domestic law on extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances in Colombia. It included an analysis of both the ordinary justice system, as well as transitional justice mechanisms. It also explored the role of the forensic sciences in tackling impunity for those crimes.
The ICJ in furtherance of its objective to promote accountability, justice and the rule of law in Colombia, has been continuously monitoring the investigation and prosecution of serious human rights violations and abuses, particularly extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances. Perpetrators of such violations, which constitute crimes under international law, have enjoyed a high level of impunity. While there are numerous unresolved cases dating back to the 1970s, violations have continued even after a comprehensive peace agreement was signed in 2016 following decades of armed conflict.
In Colombia, achieving accountability for those crimes has proven difficult for several reasons, including the ineffective functioning of the justice system. Victims and their lawyers have faced serious obstacles in gaining access to effective remedies. In addition, the creation of new institutions by the Peace Agreement has changed some basic rules and procedures for the investigation and prosecution of those crimes. Consequently, the Colombian justice system is more complicated to understand not only for victims but for lawyers.
The training workshop was part of a broader regional project addressing justice for extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances in Colombia, Guatemala and Peru. Participants were victims and human rights lawyers from different regions of the country, especially those where that is less opportunity to access legal and forensic training. Considering that capacity building activities are essential to the effective achievement of accountability, it is expected that participants of the training will obtain valuable tools to demand justice and remedy and reparations for serious human rights violations.
Contacts:
Rocío Quintero M, Legal Adviser, Latin America. Email: rocio.quintero(a)icj.org
Carolina Villadiego, ICJ Legal and Policy Adviser, Latin America, and Regional Coordinator of the Project. Email: carolina.villadiego(a)icj.org
