Training in Germany on the rights of migrant children

Training in Germany on the rights of migrant children

Today, the ICJ and Bundesfachverband unbegleitete minderjährige Flüchtlinge (BumF) are holding a training for lawyers on the rights of migrant children and on accessing international human rights mechanisms in Berlin.
The training aims to support the strategic use of national and international mechanisms to foster migrant children’s access to justice.

The training will take place over the course of two days: 20-21 June 2017.

The training will focus on accessing the international mechanisms in order to protect and promote the rights of migrant children, the child’s procedural rights including the right to be heard, the right to family life and family reunification.

A practical case analysis will be part of the training.

Trainers include Karolína Babická, Legal Adviser of ICJ’s Europe Programme, Claudia Kittel from the CRC Monitoring body in Germany, Sigrun Krause from JUMEN e.V. and Joris Sprakel, Lecturer at the Hague University.

The training is based on draft training materials prepared by the ICJ (to be published in the second half of 2017) and the ICJ Practitioners Guide no. 6: Migration and International Human Rights Law.

It is organized as part of the FAIR project co-funded by the Rights, Equality and Citizenship Programme of the European Union and OSIFE.

The past trainings on the rights of migrant children within the FAIR project took place in SpainItalyBulgariaMaltaGreece and Ireland. The Strategic litigation Retreat, which will bring three lawyers of each of the national trainings together with experts on in-depth insights and strategising on accessing international mechanisms will follow in October this year.

Download the agenda (in German) here:

Germany-FAIRtraining-Event-Agenda-2017 (in PDF)

Постоянное отсутствие ответственности за выдачу и тайное содержание под стражей (заявление ООН)

Постоянное отсутствие ответственности за выдачу и тайное содержание под стражей (заявление ООН)

МКЮ сегодня обратила внимание Совета по правам человека на неспособность ответственных государств обеспечить подотчетность за выдачу и тайное содержание под стражей в нескольких странах мира. Этот вопрос был отмечен устным заявлением в Генеральном обсуждении о положении прав человека, которое требует внимания Совета.

Заявление МКЮ продолжалось следующим образом:

Осуществляемая США программа выдачи и тайного содержания под стражей последнего десятилетия привела к совершению вопиющих нарушений прав человека и преступлений по международному праву в глобальном масштабе с участием нескольких государств, в том числе в Европе.

Подобная практика была принята в Российской Федерации, где похищения подозреваемых в терроризме или «экстремизме» и передача в государства Центральной Азии продолжаются, не обращая внимания на принцип невыдворения.

Ни одно из государств, участвовавших в проводимой под руководством США программе выдачи, или в методах похищения и передачи, происходящих в Российской Федерации, не обеспечило полную ответственность виновных и полную компенсацию жертвам.

МКЮ призывает этот Совет настоятельно призвать все государства-члены ООН обеспечить полную ответственность и возмещение ущерба жертвам за нарушения прав человека, которые произошли в ходе этих операций.

ICJ mourns the loss of Justice P.N. Bhagwati

ICJ mourns the loss of Justice P.N. Bhagwati

Justice Prafullachandra Natwarlal Bhagwati, former ICJ Commissioner and Honorary Member and Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of India, passed away at the age of 95, on 15 June 2017, following a brief illness.

“The International Commission of Jurists benefited greatly from Justice Bhagwati’s engagement and leadership. He was a giant of the human rights movement, dedicated to enlarging and ensuring access to justice for everyone, including those who couldn’t seek and receive justice due to their economic or social status,” said Sam Zarifi, ICJ’s Secretary-General.

“His dedication and ground-breaking approach to human rights accountability inspired many within and outside of the ICJ, and the values he represented will continue to inspire and inform our work,” he added.

Justice Bhagwati had a long history of promoting and protecting human rights, both at home and on the international stage, particularly for the most marginalized and vulnerable individuals and groups.

Former Chief Justice of India, Justice P.N. Bhagwati held a long and illustrious career within the Indian judiciary.

He introduced many innovative reforms within the Indian judicial system that increased access to justice for the poorest and most disadvantaged, including as a pioneer of public interest litigation and absolute liability.

Outside of India, Justice P.N. Bhagwati played a prominent role in the international human rights movement, for example as a member of the Committee of Experts of the International Labour Organization and Chair of the United Nations Human Rights Committee.

He was also actively involved in a number of non-governmental organizations, including the ICJ, where he committed to a high number of missions, seminars, publications and other activities on behalf of the organization.

He also served as a long-standing Chair of the Advisory Board for the ICJ’s Centre for the Independence of Judges and Lawyers.

Turkey: judicial independence and freedom of expression

Turkey: judicial independence and freedom of expression

The ICJ welcomed today the Special Rapporteur’s report on Turkey and his preliminary findings on his visit to the country last November.

The ICJ welcomes and concurs with the finding that the “situation of the judiciary is undermining freedom of opinion and expression”.

Mass dismissals of judges have had a devastating effect on the judiciary’s independence, already weakened by the current state of emergency. Furthermore, we are concerned at the claim by the President that the state of emergency will remain in place until Turkey reaches “peace and prosperity”.  Whatever other questions there may be about their validity, maintaining emergency derogations to human rights law instruments for such an open-ended period would clearly not be in line with international law.

The ICJ is also concerned at the constitutional amendments approved on the 16th of April by a referendum. Among other things, the amendments have given powers to the President and the Parliament to appoint all the members of the High Council of Judges and Prosecutors, the body tasked with protecting the independence of these professions.

The judiciary has had in the past an important role in implementing legislation that has severely limited the freedom of journalists to carry out their job.

The independence of the judiciary has now been eroded to its core in Turkey. Without it, there is no effective remedy in the country to protect freedom of opinion and expression.

Further reading: ICJ’s briefing paper Turkey: the Judicial System in Peril

Business responsibility to respect human rights:  challenges and opportunities six years after the adoption of UNGPs

Business responsibility to respect human rights: challenges and opportunities six years after the adoption of UNGPs

Today, the ICJ and FIDH are organizing a side event to to the 35th Regular session of the Human Rights Council on business and human rights.

Business responsibility to respect human rights

Challenges and opportunities six years after the adoption of UNGPs 

A dialogue to move forward

 Thursday 8 June 2017, 15.30-17.00

Meeting Room VIII

Palais des Nations, Geneva

After the adoption of the UNGP in 2011, standards on business responsibility to respect human rights and business human rights due diligence have gained prominence in the global debate on business accountability.

Many companies claim to comply with the UNGP by performing a human rights due diligence including across their global supply chain.

Several initiatives have emerged at regional and national level to promote companies’ due diligence processes, including the EU Directive on non-financial reporting, the UK Modern Slavery Act, the French law on company devoir de vigilance.

Despite the progress, serious human rights abuses still occur in both developing and developed countries.

The ability of companies to identify, monitor and prevent negative human rights impacts in their operations and relationships is still weak and the access to effective remedy remains difficult if not impossible.

This is an opportune moment to take stock of the progresses made to date and the challenges ahead in order to create a level playing field that will effectively promote the respect of human rights in business global operations.

Welcome speech

Saman Zia-Zarifi, ICJ Secretary General

Moderator

Carlos Lopez, ICJ

Panelists

Fernanda Hopenhaym, PODER/ESCR-net CAWG steering group

Maddalena Neglia, FIDH

Michael Addo, UN Working Group on BHR

Olivier De Schutter, UN Committee on ESCR/University of Louvain

Translate »