Oct 11, 2016 | News
Today, the ICJ observed a hearing in the case of Azimzhan Askarov, a prominent human rights defender in Kyrgyzstan, convicted in 2011 of murder and incitement to ethnic hatred, after an unfair trial, and sentenced to life imprisonment.
Azimzhan Askarov is appealing against his conviction following a decision of the UN Human Rights Committee.
The Chuy Court began the appeal hearing in the case on 4 October, following the findings of the UN Human Rights Committee that Azimzhan Askarov’s arrest, detention and trial violated the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), including the prohibition on torture or other ill-treatment, the prohibition on arbitrary detention, and the right to fair trial.
As a result, the Supreme Court ordered a reconsideration of the case earlier this year.
At today’s hearing a witness who was Askarov’s former cellmate confessed that he beat Askarov up in detention, which is the first time that direct testimony about Askarov’s torture or other ill-treatment has been presented to the Court.
Previously such allegations were refuted by the prosecution.
The next hearing is scheduled for 18 October. The ICJ will continue monitoring the case in future hearings.
Contact
Róisín Pillay, e: roisin.pillay(a)icj.org
Dmitry Nurumov, e: dmitry.nurumov(a)icj.org
Background
Azimzhan Askarov, a prominent human rights defender, was convicted of murder and incitement to ethnic hatred and sentenced to life imprisonment in December 2011.
The charges concerned allegations of his participation in a murder of Myktybek Sulayamanov, a police officer, during the 2010 ethnic clashes in the South of Kyrgyzstan.
The ICJ observed the appeal hearing in the case before the Supreme Court on 20 December 2011.
Based on the results of the mission as well as the documents of the case, the ICJ published a detailed report on the arrest, detention and trial of Azimzhan Askarov.
In March 2016, the UN Human Rights Committee issued a decision in regard to Askarov’s complaint and found violations of Articles 7 (freedom from torture), Article 9 (prohibition of arbitrary detention); Article 10 (right to humane treatment in detention), Article 14 (right to a fair trial) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
On 12 July 2016, the Supreme Court ordered a further reconsideration of the case on appeal.
The Chuy Regional Court is currently considering the case.
kyrgyzstan-askarov-trial-obs-news-web-story-2016-rus (full story in Russian, PDF)
Oct 11, 2016 | News
Thailand should immediately end the use of Article 44 of the Interim Constitution which gives the Head of the military junta sweeping, unchecked powers contrary to the rule of law and human rights, said the ICJ today.
Despite widespread international condemnation of Article 44, its use has increased every year since the Interim Constitution was promulgated on 22 July 2014 following the coup d’état of 22 May 2014.
The Head of the National Council for Peace and Order (NCPO), Prayut Chan-o-cha, has issued at least 107 Orders under Article 44 (available in the public domain): at least one in 2014; 44 in 2015; and 62 in 2016 to date – with 37 Orders being issued since June 2016 alone.
“The Head of the NCPO’s increasing willingness to use extraordinary powers to make ad hoc, arbitrary changes to existing laws and regulations without judicial oversight should be alarming to everyone, including the business sector,” said Wilder Tayler, Secretary General of the ICJ.
“Article 44 places law making power in the hands of one man, while Articles 47 and 48 of the Interim Constitution block judicial review or access to remedies and reparation. This is entirely inconsistent with the three fundamental pillars of the rule of law, equality, accountability and predictability, and should be revoked immediately,” he added.
The Article 44 orders range from those restricting the civil rights of all people in Thailand to those aimed at seemingly minor and ordinary bureaucratic processes.
To date, Article 44 has been used to introduce a raft of revisions into existing Thai law without observing proper process or practice, including providing for the acquisition of land for the establishment of Special Economic Zones bypassing the usual environmental and social checks and balances provided for in domestic legislation; granting military officers sweeping powers of investigation, arrest and detention; and prohibiting the gathering of five or more persons for political purposes.
“It is long past time for Thailand to revoke Article 44 and all others laws, orders and announcements issued since the military coup that are inconsistent with the rule of law and human rights,” Tayler said.
“The justifications the military presented for such measures were never valid or credible, and certainly not so after more than two years of direct military rule.”
All Orders issued under Article 44 – and all other NCPO Orders and Announcements – will continue to remain in force under the draft Constitution that was accepted at a public referendum on 7 August 2016, and may only be repealed or amended by an Act.
Last week, Deputy Prime Minister Wissanu Krea-ngam announced that the NCPO was considering converting many of the hundreds of orders issued by the NCPO into legislation, including those issued under Article 44.
thailand-art-44-ncpo-news-press-releases-2016-eng (full text with background, in PDF)
thailand-head-of-ncpo-orders-advocacy-2016-eng (full list of all publicly available Head of NCPO Orders, in PDF)
thailand-art-44-ncpo-news-press-releases-2016-tha (full text in Thai, PDF)
Oct 10, 2016 | Events, News
The ICJ, OSCE and Group 484 are holding a training on migration and international human rights law starting on From 10 to 13 October in Zlatibor (Serbia).
The training has been organised by the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) and the Serbian NGO “Group 484” and will be given by the International Commission of Jurists.
It will focus on international protection of migrants and asylum seekers, access to territory and asylum and the principle of non-refoulement, in light of the current migrants and refugee crisis and drawing from the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights, of the UN human rights systems and from EU law.
The training will be centred on the ICJ Practitioners Guide no. 6: Migration and International Human Rights Law.
serbia-jointtrainingmigrationhr-events-2016-eng (download the agenda)
Oct 7, 2016 | Новости, Статьи
Сегодня МКЮ выразила обеспокоенность в связи с приговором суда, которым таджикские адвокаты Бузургмехр Ёров и Нуриддин Махкамов были признаны виновными в разжигании вражды и призывам к экстремизму и приговорены к 23 и 21 годам лишения свободы соответственно.
«Данный приговор продолжает серию преследований в отношении адвокатов страны и только ухудшит обстановку, которая и так не способствует независимости адвокатуры в Таджикистане,» – отметила Роушин Пиллей, директор Региональной программы МКЮ по Европе и СНГ.
«МКЮ призывает правительство Таджикистана обеспечить право адвокатов на обжалование приговоров в рамках справедливой процедуры в независимом суде,» – добавила она. – «Следует исключить возможность использования уголовного преследования исполнительной властью в качестве средства ограничения возможностей адвокатов по выполнению своих профессиональных обязанностей, а также обеспечить, чтобы адвокаты не подвергались актам возмездия из-за того, что их отождествляют с интересами подзащитных».
6 октября Суд города Душанбе признал адвокатов виновными по ряду обвинений, в том числе по обвинениям в разжигании вражды, призывам к насильственному изменению конституционного строя и экстремистской деятельности, приговорив их к лишению свободы.
Кроме того, адвокатов лишили права заниматься адвокатской деятельностью в течение пяти лет по истечении срока лишения свободы.
Бузургмехр Ёров, руководитель коллегии адвокатов «Сипар», был задержан 28 сентября 2015 г. Нуриддин Махкамов, адвокат этой коллегии, взят под стражу 22 октября 2015 года. Н
а момент задержания оба адвоката представляли интересы членов Партии исламского возрождения Таджикистана (ПИВТ).
В ходе судебного разбирательства, которое было закрыто для публики, кроме родственников обвиняемых, адвокаты отрицали обвинения и настаивали на том, что дело является политически мотивированным и связано с тем, что они защищали членов ПИВТ.
По сообщениям СМИ, Бузургмехр Ёров показал в суде, что за защиту членов ПИВТ он взялся не из-за симпатий к партии, а из чувства профессионального долга.
Данный приговор вызывает серьезную обеспокоенность по международному праву в области прав человека, а также международных стандартов, касающихся роли юристов.
Основополагающий принцип, в соответствии с которым адвокаты ни при каких обстоятельствах не должны отождествляться со своими клиентами и с интересами своих клиентов в результате выполнения профессиональных обязанностей, является необходимым условием соблюдения права на справедливое судебное разбирательство и гарантируется международными стандартами, касающимися роли юристов.
Кроме того, Основные принципы ООН, касающиеся роли юристов, устанавливают обязанность правительства обеспечить, чтобы адвокаты «могли выполнять все свои профессиональные обязанности в обстановке, свободой от угроз, препятствий, запугивания или неоправданного вмешательства» (принцип 16).
Данное дело также поднимает вопрос о соблюдении права на справедливое судебное разбирательство, закрепленное в статье 14 Международного пакта о гражданских и политических правах, участником которого является Таджикистан.
«Данные нападки продолжают волну арестов и уголовных дел, возбужденных в отношении адвокатов в Таджикистане,» – заявила г-жа Пиллей.
«Они оказывают «запугивающий эффект» с точки зрения надлежащего выполнения профессиональных обязанностей другими членами адвокатуры, что угрожает соблюдению права на справедливое судебное разбирательство и подрывает судебную систему, – добавила она. – Поэтому МКЮ призывает правительство принять срочные меры по предупреждению подобных нападок на адвокатов в будущем».
Контакты:
Роушин Пиллей, директор Региональной программы МКЮ по Европе, roisin.pillay(a)icj.org
Тимур Шакиров, правовой советник Региональной программы МКЮ по Европе, temur.shakirov(a)icj.org
Дополнительная информация:
Бузургмехр Ёров был задержан 28 сентября 2015 г. Первоначально он обвинялся в мошенничестве. Впоследствии в ходе досудебного содержания под стражей ему были предъявлены дополнительные обвинения. Адвокат приговорен к 23 годам лишения свободы по обвинению в разжигании национальной, расовой, религиозной и местнической розни (статья 189 Уголовного кодекса (УК)), мошенничестве (статья 247 УК), публичных призывах к насильственному изменению конституционного строя (статья 307 УК), публичных призывах к осуществлению экстремистской деятельности (статья 3071 УК), подделке, изготовлении и сбыте поддельных документов, государственных наград, штампов, печатей, бланков (статья 340 УК).
Нуриддин Махкамов был задержан 22 октября 2016 г. Первоначально обвинялся в мошенничестве. В ходе досудебного содержания под стражей адвокату были предъявлены дополнительные обвинения. Признан виновным в разжигании национальной, расовой, религиозной и местнической розни (статья 189 Уголовного кодекса (УК)), мошенничестве (статья 247 УК), публичных призывах к насильственному изменению конституционного строя (статья 307 УК), публичных призывах к осуществлению экстремистской деятельности (статья 3071 УК).
В 2015 году Верховный Суд Таджикистана объявил ПИВТ террористической организацией и наложил запрет на ее деятельность. Руководители партии были приговорены к длительным срокам лишения свободы в результате закрытых судебных процессов по обвинению в терроризме, экстремизме и посягательствах на изменение конституционного строя.
Начиная с 2014 года в Таджикистане были взяты под стражу и признаны виновными несколько известных адвокатов. Некоторые из них вышли на свободу, другие остаются в заключении. В числе последних Шухрат Кудратов, адвокат бывшей министра энергетики Зайда Саидова, признанный виновным в мошенничестве и даче взятки в 2015 году.
tajikistan-yorov-makhkamov-news-web-story-2016-rus (полный текст на русском, PDF)
Oct 7, 2016 | News
The ICJ today expressed its serious concerns over the convictions on charges of incitement and extremism of Tajikistan lawyers Buzurgmehr Yorov and Nuriddin Makhkamov, and their sentencing to 23 and 21 years in prison respectively.
“These convictions, which continue a recent pattern of persecution of lawyers in the country, will contribute to the already poor climate for the independence of the legal profession in Tajikistan,” said Róisín Pillay, Director of the ICJ’s Europe and CIS Programme.
“The ICJ calls on the Government of Tajikistan to ensure that the two lawyers are able to appeal their convictions through a fair process before an independent court,” she added. “It should ensure that criminal prosecution is not used by the executive as a means to limit lawyers in the exercise of their professional duty, and that lawyers do not suffer any reprisals due to their identification with their clients’ causes.”
On 6 October, the two lawyers were sentenced by the Dushanbe City Court on a number of charges, which included incitement to feud, calls for a violent change of the constitutional order and extremist activity.
They were also banned from working as lawyers for five years after serving their sentences.
Buzurgmehr Yorov, head of the Sipar Collegium of Lawyers, was arrested on 28 September 2015. Nuriddin Makhkamov, a lawyer of the same Collegium, was taken into police custody on 22 October 2015.
Both lawyers represented members of the Islamic Renaissance Party of Tajikistan (IRPT) at the time of their arrests.
At the trial, which was closed to the public, with only relatives allowed to attend, the lawyers denied their guilt and argued that the case was politically motivated and related to their defence of IPRT members.
Buzurgmehr Yorov was reported to have testified during the trial that he took up the case not because of a sympathy for the IRPT but because of his professional duty as a lawyer.
These convictions raise significant concerns under international human rights law and international standards on the role of lawyers.
It is a fundamental principle, necessary for the right to fair trial and recognized in international standards on the role of lawyers, that lawyers should never be identified with their clients or their clients’ causes as a result of discharging their professional functions.
The UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers further require governments to ensure that lawyers “are able to preform all of their professional functions without intimidation, hindrance, harassment or improper interference” (Principle 16).
The case also gives rise to concerns regarding respect for the right to a fair trial protected by Article 14 of the International Covenant of Civil and Political Rights, to which Tajikistan is a party.
“These attacks continue a wave of arrests and charges against lawyers in Tajikistan,” said Pillay.
“They create a chilling effect on the proper exercise of professional duties by other members of the legal profession, endangering the right to a fair trial and undermining the justice system,” she added. “The ICJ therefore calls on the Government to take urgent measures to prevent further such attacks on lawyers.”
Contact:
Róisín Pillay, Director, ICJ Europe and CIS Programme, t: +32 2 734 84 46; e: roisin.pillay(a)icj.org
Temur Shakirov, Legal Adviser, ICJ Europe and CIS Programme, t: +41 22 979 38 32; e: temur.shakirov(a)icj.org
Additional Information:
Buzurgmehr Yorov was arrested on 28 September 2015 and initially changed with fraud. Other charges were added later during his pre-trial detention. He was sentenced to 23 years imprisonment on charges of incitement to national, racial, local or religious feud (Article 189 of the Criminal Code (CC)), fraud (Article 247 of the CC), public calls to a violent change of the constitutional order (Article 307 of the CC), public calls to conduct extremist activity (Article 3071 of the CC), forgery, production or sale of forged documents, state awards, stamps, forms (Article 340 of the CC).
Nuriddin Makhkamov was arrested on 22 October 2015. He was initially charged with fraud. Further charges were added during his pre-trial detention. He was convicted on charges including incitement to national, racial, local or religious feud (Article 189 of the CC), fraud (Article 247 of the CC), public calls to a violent change of the constitutional order (Article 307 of the CC), public calls to conduct extremist activity (Article 3071 of the CC).
The IRPT was found to be a terrorist organization by the Supreme Court of Tajikistan in 2015 and banned. Its leaders received long prison sentences in closed trials on charges of terrorism, extremism and attempts to overthrow the constitutional order.
A number of other prominent lawyers have been arrested and convicted in Tajikistan since 2014. Some have been released, others remain in detention, including Shukhrat Kudratov, the lawyer of the former Minister of Energy Zaid Saidov, convicted on fraud and bribery charges in 2015.
tajikistan-yorov-makhkamov-news-web-story-2016-rus (full text in Russian, PDF)
