Attacks on Justice 2002: Israel

Attacks on Justice 2002: Israel

The basic laws of Israel guarantee the independence of the judiciary, which is generally respected by the legislative and executive powers.

The September 1999 landmark judgement of the High Court barring the use of torture and the April 2000 ruling prohibiting the holding of detainees for use as “bargaining chips” demonstrated that the judiciary would maintain independence even in certain sensitive cases relating to national security. The overall human rights situation vis-à-vis the Palestinian population under the jurisdiction or control of Israel deteriorated markedly. Following the outbreak of violence in late September 2000, Israeli security forces made repeated and sustained incursions into Palestinian territory, engaging in widespread and gross violations of human rights and humanitarian law.

Attacks on justice 2002-Israel-publications-2002 (full text, PDF)

Attacks on Justice 2002: Chad

Attacks on Justice 2002: Chad

Chad has been in a state of near constant internal conflict for the past 30 years. The Government’s human rights record remains poor and impunity with respect to serious human rights violations is widespread.

President Déby has intervened inappropriately in cases before the judiciary. For the first time in the country’s history, a Supreme Court and a Constitutional Council were officially functional.

Attacks on justice 2002-Chad-publications-2002 (full text, PDF)

 

Attacks on Justice 2002: Azerbaijan

Attacks on Justice 2002: Azerbaijan

Despite irregularities during elections in November 2000 and January 2001, Azerbaijan was admitted to the Council of Europe in January 2001.

Attacks on Justice 2002: India

Attacks on Justice 2002: India

The independence of the judiciary continued generally to be respected in India, but the judicial system remained overburdened and financially dependent on the executive.

Translate »