Towards principles on criminalisation and human rights

Towards principles on criminalisation and human rights

The ICJ today highlighted the negative impacts of criminalisation of HIV non-disclosure, exposure and transmission, on human rights, as well as an ongoing initiative to develop a set of relevant principles, at the UN Human Rights Council.

The oral statement, delivered during the General Debate under Agenda Item 3, was titled “Developing principles to address the detrimental impact on health, equality and human rights of criminalization with a focus on select conduct in the areas of sexuality, reproduction, drug use and HIV” and read as follows:

“The ICJ welcomes the High Commissioner’s report (A/HRC/41/27) on human rights in the response to HIV.

Unjust criminalization of HIV non-disclosure, exposure and transmission is a barrier to the realization of human rights – fostering stigma, discrimination, violence and abuse.

Last year, the ICJ – supported by UNAIDS, OHCHR and UNDP – convened a meeting of jurists to address the harmful effects of misuse of criminal law in relation to HIV and other issues.

The meeting endorsed civil society’s call for jurists to elaborate a set of principles to assist legislatures, the courts, administrative and prosecutorial authorities, and advocates address the deleterious impact on health, equality, and human rights of criminalization in a range of areas. In addition to HIV, jurists concluded the principles should address criminalization of sexual and reproductive healthcare services, including abortion; criminalization of consensual sexual conduct, including sex work, sex outside marriage, same-sex relations, and adolescent sexual activity; and criminalization of drug use and of possession of drugs for personal use.

To ensure the jurists’ principles are effective and protect the most at-risk individuals, the process for developing them is as important as the content of the principles themselves. Thus, broad consultation with a wide range of stakeholders, including national and international civil society organizations, UN human rights mandate holders and UN agencies, is ongoing.”

Civil society, criminalisation, and the Global Compact for Migration

Civil society, criminalisation, and the Global Compact for Migration

The ICJ today joined other NGOs in calling on States to do more to save lives and uphold human rights of migrants, including by recognising the role of civil society and creating an environment for its work.

The statement to the UN Human Rights Council, delivered on behalf of the group of NGOs by the International Catholic Migration Commission, read as follows:

“We are deeply concerned by widespread and growing violations of the human rights of migrants and an environment where those who seek to protect them are increasingly criminalized.

The Global Compact for Migration provides technical guidance and a cooperative framework for the implementation of existing legal commitments. It is mobilizing resources to support States in this.

We are asking you to do more and to do better to save lives and uphold human rights. The Compact can help you do this.

Civil Society is already using the Compact at regional and national level, often in partnership with States, for example:

  • Civil society in Central America are developing a pilot programme to identify missing migrants to support States’ implementation of Objectives 8 and 9.
  • Migrant Forum in Asia has led consultations with governments and other stakeholders throughout Asia.
  • Cross-Regional Center for Refugees and Migrants has developed a baseline assessment on the GCM for the MENA region.
  • The International Detention Coalition is working with States to develop a cross regional platform on alternatives to child immigration detention in line with Objective 13(h)

We believe these activities can inspire similar measures, but we need all States to create an environment that enables us to do so and we need all States to take leadership on implementation.

The human rights of migrants deserve the acknowledgement, respect, and urgent action of all of us.”

Delivered by the International Catholic Migration Commission, the statement was co-sponsored by the following ECOSOC accredited NGOs:

  1. ACT Alliance
  2. Alianza Americas
  3. Asylum Access
  4. Caritas Internationalis
  5. Congregation of Our Lady of Charity of the Good Shepherd
  6. Congregations of St. Joseph
  7. Defence for Children International
  8. International Catholic Migration Commission
  9. International Commission of Jurists
  10. International Council of Voluntary Associations (ICVA)
  11. International Detention Coalition
  12. International Movement Against All Forms of Discrimination and Racism (IMADR)
  13. Migrant Forum in Asia
  14. Save the Children
  15. Terre des Hommes International Federation
  16. Translators without Borders
  17. Vivat International
  18. World Organization for Early Childhood Education (OMEP)

The statement was also supported by the following NGOs and networks who do not have ECOSOC accreditation:

  1. Action Secours Ambulance (ASA)
  2. Asia Pacific Refugee Rights Network (APRRN)
  3. Asociación Rumiñahui
  4. Bloque latinamericano y el Caribe sobre Migración
  5. Casa Monarca ayuda humanitaria al migrante
  6. Center for Migrant Advocacy, Philippines (CMA-Phils)
  7. Centro de Atención y Desarrollo Integral Migrante (CADIM Oxnard)
  8. Centro de Recursos Centroamericanos Del Norte California (CARECEN)
  9. Centro de Atención a la Familia Migrante e Indígena (CAFAMI)
  10. Civil Society Action Committee
  11. Comision de Accion Social Menonita (CASM)
  12. Destination Unknown Network
  13. Estancia del Migrante González y Martínez
  14. FM4 – Paso Libre
  15. Fundación para la Justicia y el Estado Democrático de Derecho
  16. Global Coalition on Migration
  17. Institution para las Mujeres en la Migración (IMUMI)
  18. Instituto de Estudios y Divulgación sobre Migración (INEDIM)
  19. International Presentation Association
  20. NGO Coalition on Migration
  21. Organismo Cristiano de Desarrollo Intergral de Honduras (OCDIH)
  22. Pacific Islands Association of Non-Government Organisation (PIANGO)
  23. Plateforme des Organisations Nationales et Territoriales (Pont-Sch)
  24. Red de Mujeres del Bajío
  25. Red Internacional de Migración y Desarrollo
  26. Red Jesuita con Migrantes de América Latina y Caribe (RJM-LAC)
  27. Religious of the Sacred Heart of Mary
  28. Solidarity Centre
  29. The Mixed Migration Centre
  30. Women in Migration Network
Guatemala: ICJ and partners conduct workshops the investigation and prosecution of unlawful death and enforced disappearances

Guatemala: ICJ and partners conduct workshops the investigation and prosecution of unlawful death and enforced disappearances

Between 26 and 29 June 2019, in Guatemala City, ICJ and its partner, Fundación de Antropología Forense de Guatemala (FAFG), with the support of the Asociación Guatemalteca de Jueces por la Integridad (AGJI) and the Bufete de Derechos Humanos (BDH), undertook trainings of more than 12 judges and 20 prosecutors on the international law and standards that apply to the investigation of unlawful death and enforced disappearances.

The workshops were conducted as part of the project under the ICJ’s Global Accountability Initiative entitled, Promoting justice for extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances in Colombia, Guatemala and Peru, supported by the EU European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR).

Opening remarks were given by Tomás Pallás Aparisi, Head of Cooperation at the EU Delegation to Guatemala, Delia Dávila, Magistrate from the Supreme Court of Guatemala and Haroldo Vasquez, President of the Asociación Guatemalteca de Jueces por la Integridad AJGI.

Ramón Cadena, Director of the ICJ’s Central America Office, addressed the international law and standards that apply to the investigation and prosecution of unlawful death and enforced disappearances and their relevance to Guatemala. Edgar Pérez, director of Bufete de Derechos Humanos (BDH) discussed the situation of enforced disappearances in Guatemala and the value and applicability of international law and standards. Marco García, a representative of FAFG, outlined the role of forensic science in the investigation of unlawful death and enforced disappearances.

Kingsley Abbott, Senior Legal Adviser & Coordinator of the ICJ’s Global Accountability Initiative, provided an overview of the revised Minnesota Protocol on the Investigation of Potentially Unlawful Death (2016), which formed the core of the materials used at the workshops.

The ICJ took the opportunity of the workshops to visit the office of its partner, the Asociación de Familiares de Detenidos-Desaparecidos de Guatemala (FAMDEGUA) and meet with Justice Delia Marina Davila Salazar of the Supreme Court of Justice of Guatemala.

Contacts:

Kingsley Abbott, Senior Legal Adviser & Coordinator of the ICJ’s Global Accountability Initiative, email: kingsley.abbott(a)icj.org

Carolina Villadiego Burbano, ICJ Legal and Policy Adviser, Latin America, and Regional Coordinator of the Project, email: carolina.villadiego(a)icj.org

Guatemala: la CIJ, junto con sus socios en el país, realiza talleres de capacitación sobre la investigación y el enjuiciamiento de ejecuciones extrajudiciales y desapariciones forzadas

Guatemala: la CIJ, junto con sus socios en el país, realiza talleres de capacitación sobre la investigación y el enjuiciamiento de ejecuciones extrajudiciales y desapariciones forzadas

Entre el 26 y el 29 de junio de 2019, en la Ciudad de Guatemala, la CIJ, junto con la Fundación de Antropología Forense de Guatemala (FAFG), y el apoyo de la Asociación Guatemalteca de Jueces por la Integridad (AGJI) y el Bufete de Derechos Humanos (BDH), llevó a cabo actividades de capacitación dirigidas a más de 12 jueces y 20 fiscales, acerca de los estándares internacionales que se aplican en la investigación de las ejecuciones extrajudiciales y las desapariciones forzadas.

Las actividades se llevaron a cabo en el marco del proyecto “Promoviendo justicia para ejecuciones extrajudiciales y desapariciones forzadas en Colombia, Guatemala y Perú”, bajo la Iniciativa Global de rendición de cuentas de la CIJ, y con el apoyo del Instrumento Europeo para la Democracia y los Derechos Humanos (IEDDH).

Las actividades contaron con la presencia de Tomás Pallás Aparisi, Jefe de Cooperación de la Delegación de la Unión Europea en Guatemala; Delia Dávila, Magistrada de la Corte Suprema de Guatemala; y Haroldo Vásquez, Presidente de la Asociación Guatemalteca de Jueces por la Integridad (AGJI).

En estas actividades, Ramón Cadena, director de la Oficina de Centroamérica de la CIJ, se refirió a la importancia de los estándares internacionales aplicables a la investigación y al enjuiciamiento de las ejecuciones extrajudiciales y desapariciones forzadas. Además, Edgar Pérez, director del Bufete de Derechos Humanos (BDH), analizó la situación de las desapariciones forzadas en Guatemala y el valor y la aplicabilidad de los estándares internacionales en el país.

Asimismo, Marco García, miembro de la FAFG, describió el papel de la ciencia forense en la investigación de estas graves violaciones a los derechos humanos. Finalmente, Kingsley Abbott, asesor legal senior y coordinador de la Iniciativa Global de Rendición de Cuentas de la CIJ, proporcionó una visión general acerca de los contenidos del “Protocolo de Minnesota sobre la Investigación de Muertes Potencialmente Ilícitas” (versión revisada de 2016).

La CIJ aprovechó la realización de estas actividades de capacitación para visitar a la Asociación de Familiares de Detenidos-Desaparecidos de Guatemala (FAMDEGUA) y reunirse con la jueza Delia Marina Dávila, de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de Guatemala.

Contactos:

Kingsley Abbott, asesor legal senior y coordinador de la iniciativa global de rendición de cuentas de la CIJ. Correo electrónico: kingsley.abbott(a)icj.org

Carolina Villadiego, Asesora Legal, América Latina, y coordinadora regional del proyecto. Correo Electrónico: carolina.villadiego(a)icj.org

Morocco: remove obstacles to women’s and girls’ access to justice for sexual and gender-based violence – New ICJ report

Morocco: remove obstacles to women’s and girls’ access to justice for sexual and gender-based violence – New ICJ report

In a report released today in Rabat, the ICJ called for the removal and eradication of legal obstacles and discriminatory judicial attitudes hindering women’s and girls’ ability to seek justice and redress for sexual and gender-based violence (SGBV) in Morocco.

The ICJ’s report Obstacles to Women’s and Girls’ Access to Justice for Gender-based Violence in Morocco (available in English and Arabic) explores the various obstacles that women seeking justice in Morocco face, and addresses recommendations to the Moroccan government and judiciary with a view to improving access to justice and effective remedies for women and girls who are victims of SGBV.

“The Moroccan authorities should amend Law 103/13 and the Penal Code to ensure compliance with international human rights law and standards. Morocco’s Office of the Public Prosecutor and the country’s judicial authorities, including the High Judicial Council, should ensure that detailed guidelines on investigation and prosecution of SGBV crimes are developed and complied with, and that awareness-raising programmes be rolled out to counter judicial stereotyping and victim-blaming,” said Saïd Benarbia, Director of the Middle East and North Africa Programme at the ICJ.

Notwithstanding the recent adoption of Law 103/03 on combatting violence against women, SGBV has not been adequately addressed; it remains widespread in Morocco, with a profoundly detrimental human rights impact on victims and society at large. Law 103/3 fails to define rape in a manner consistent with relevant international law and standards, with the crime still addressed through the lens of morality and public decency, rather than as a violation of one’s bodily integrity and autonomy; Law 103/3 also fails to criminalize child and early marriage, lending support to this harmful practice.

In addition to discriminatory laws and procedures, women and girls seeking justice and redress as survivors of SGBV in Morocco have to face a judiciary that often harbours biased assumptions, and propounds negative gender stereotypes, including cultural norms rooted in patriarchy.

Against this background, the ICJ’s report analyses how exceedingly lenient sentences – for instance in cases of marital rape – and the heightened risk women and girls face of being charged with consensual extramarital sexual relations deter them from seeking justice and redress in case of physical and sexual abuse of which they may be victims, either at the hands of their husband or of individuals with whom they are not married.

To begin addressing women’s and girls’ predicament in these and other respects related to SGBV, the report calls on the Moroccan authorities to:

  • Adopt legislation that recognizes one’s right to sexual autonomy, and that recognizes equal relationships as requiring free and full consent of both parties;
  • Adequately define and fully criminalize through a gender-neutral definition acts of rape, including by criminalizing marital rape as a separate offence;
  • Repeal Article 490 of the Penal Code criminalizing extramarital sexual relations, and ensure that Article 19 of the Family Code on the minimum age of marriage is stringently observed;
  • Enact policies, legislative and procedural measures aiming at enhancing the effectiveness of judicial and other public sector services related to women’s access to justice, including enforcing spousal and child support, providing free legal assistance to victims of SGBV, granting protection orders, and adopting other urgent measures;
  • Develop and enforce guidelines on investigating and prosecuting SGBV crimes;
  • Develop a national protocol for SGBV-related medical, forensic examinations, and ensure forensic-testing services be available and affordable;
  • Provide training and awareness-raising programmes aimed at countering judicial stereotyping, victim-blaming and other harmful practices.

Contact:

Saïd Benarbia, Director of the ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, t: +41.22.979.3817, e: said.benarbia(a)icj.org

Additional information:

ICJ Commissioner Martine Comte led the delegation that met with different Moroccan authorities, justice and civil society actors this week in Rabat in order to present ICJ’s report and discuss its findings and recommendations. The ICJ delegation met with Mr Mohamed Aujjar, Minister of Justice; Mr Taoufik El Maimouni, President of the Commission on Justice, Legislation, and Human Rights at the Chamber of Deputies; Mr Larbi Tabit, Secretary General at the Minister of Solidarity, Women, Family and Social Development; Ms Amina Bouayach, President of the National Human Rights Council and representatives of the judiciary and of the civil society.

Download:

Morocco-Obstacles GBV-Publications-Reports-Thematic report-2019-ENG (full report in English, PDF)

Morocco-Obstacles GBV-Publications-Reports-Thematic report-2019-ARA (full report in Arabic, PDF)

Morocco-Women HR report-News-2019-ARA (News story in Arabic, PDF)

Translate »