Sep 28, 2016 | News
The conviction of Member of Parliament Tian Chua under the 1948 Sedition Act increases already severe restrictions on freedom of expression in Malaysia, said the ICJ today.
The Malaysian government should drop all charges filed under this law and remove or amend this colonial era law to ensure compliance with international human rights law and standards, the ICJ added.
The Sessions Court in Kuala Lumpur convicted Tian Chua (photo) today under Section 4(1)(b) of the 1948 Sedition Act for allegedly uttering “seditious words.”
The allegedly “seditious words” spoken by Tian Chua were calling on Malaysians to “stand up and fight against racism and corruption.”
Tian Chua spoke these words at a public forum on 13 May 2013 at the Kuala Lumpur and Selangor Assembly Hall.
“Prime Minister Najib Razak promised in 2012 to abolish the 1948 Sedition Act, but until now, this promise has not been fulfilled,” said Emerlynne Gil, ICJ’s Senior International Legal Adviser.
“It now appears that the Malaysian government is holding on to this law to silence political opponents and human rights defenders who express critical views about what is happening in the country today,” she added.
Tian Chua received a penalty of three months’ imprisonment plus a fine of RM1,800 (approximately US$435).
Although he will still be entitled to keep his seat as Batu’s representative to the Malaysian Parliament, his conviction sends a clear and dangerous message that politically critical comments or dissenting opinions from anyone, including a Member of Parliament, will not be tolerated by the government, the ICJ says.
Several other people were also charged for sedition for their speeches at the same public forum where Tian Chua spoke: activists Adam Adli, Hishamuddin Md. Rais, Haris Fathillah Mohamed Ibrahim, and Safwan Anang.
All of them have already been convicted in the past few months under the same provision of the Sedition Act.
“By its very terms, the 1948 Sedition Act contemplates restrictions on the exercise of freedom of expression that are grossly overbroad and inconsistent with the basic rule of law and human rights principles,” said Gil.
The lawyers of Tian Chua, Latheefa Koya and N. Surendran, have confirmed that they will be seeking a stay order on the basis that they will be appealing the sentence and conviction.
The ICJ has repeatedly expressed its concerns regarding the restrictive effect the 1948 Sedition Act has on freedom of expression in the country.
The law criminalizes speech and publications considered to have “seditious tendencies”, a term that is very ambiguously and vaguely defined.
Last year, the ICJ expressed alarm over amendments made by the Malaysian Parliament strengthening the law and broadening its scope, making the “promotion” of hatred between religions an offence.
Contact:
Emerlynne Gil, ICJ’s Senior International Legal Adviser for Southeast Asia, t: +66840923575 ; e: emerlynne.gil(a)icj.org
Sep 28, 2016 | Advocacy, Non-legal submissions
The ICJ today delivered an oral statement to the UN Human Rights Council, during the interactive dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia.The ICJ welcomed the report of the Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Cambodia, before continuing as follows:
The ICJ concurs with the Special Rapporteur’s observation that “democratic space has been reduced in Cambodia through the application of a range of laws … and the restriction of a range of legitimate activities of non-governmental and civil society organizations.”
Since 2014, Cambodia has adopted laws inconsistent with its international human rights obligations, including undermining the independence of the judiciary, and unduly restricting the work of civil society.
Human rights defenders increasingly face retaliation for their legitimate work, shrinking civil society space.
Last week, the ICJ observed the criminal trial of Ny Chakrya, Deputy Secretary-General of the National Election Committee and former Head of Human Rights Section and Legal Aid at a leading NGO, ADHOC. He was convicted of crimes, including criminal defamation, for raising allegations of human rights violations. Ny Chakrya and four staff-members of ADHOC, all of whom are in detention, also face another investigation with all the hallmarks of being politically motivated.
Indeed, numerous members of the political opposition and human rights defenders are in exile, face legal proceedings, or have been convicted, in cases that also appear to be politically motivated.
Further, the investigation into the July 2016 killing of leading human rights defender, Kem Ley, lacks transparency.
We very much welcome the spotlight the Special Rapporteur placed on such cases by naming them here today.
2016 marks 25 years since the Paris Peace Agreements under which Cambodia undertook to “ensure respect for and observance of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Cambodia.”
We urge Cambodia, the signatories to the Paris Peace Agreements, the Special Rapporteur on Cambodia, the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, and the Human Rights Council, to work to ensure these Agreements are given full effect – particularly as Cambodia prepares for local and national elections scheduled for 2017 and 2018.
The statement may be downloaded in PDF format here: hrc33-srcambodia-2016
Sep 26, 2016 | Advocacy, Non-legal submissions
The ICJ today at the UN Human Rights Council, joined other organisations to condemn the increasing attacks aimed at deterring NGOs from exposing human rights violations.
The statement was delivered by the leading international NGO the International Service for Human Rights (ISHR), on behalf of ICJ, Amnesty International, Asian Forum for Human Rights and Development (FORUM-ASIA), Centros de Estudios Legales y Sociales (CELS), Conectas Direitos Humanos, East and Horn of Africa Human Rights Defenders Programme (EHAHRDP), and Gulf Centre for Human Rights (GCHR), during a general debate on Follow up to the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action (VDPA).
The organisations stated as follows:
“The failure of States to protect in these instanes is incompatible with the VDPA’s recognition of the ‘important role of non-governmental organisations in the promotion of all human rights’, that NGOs should be able to play this role ‘without interference’, and that they ‘enjoy the rights and freedoms recognised in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights’.
One example of such interference is the ruling on 17 September by a Cairo Criminal Court to freeze the personal bank accounts of five Egyptian human rights defenders – Bahey el din Hassan, Hossam Bahgat, Gamal Eid, Mostafa El-Hassan, and Abdel Hafiz Tayel – as part of the ongoing investigations into case no.173, also known as the foreign funding case.
The court also froze the bank accounts of three human rights NGOs: the Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies, Hisham Mubarak Law Center, and Center for the Right to Education.
As a result, a judicial committee is now expected to manage the funds of these independent NGOs and defenders, as well as have full access to their records and databases of the NGOs, including files related to victims of human rights violations.
The VDPA makes clear that the ‘administration of justice, … especially, an independent judiciary and legal profession in full conformity with applicable standards contained in international human rights instruments, are essential to the full and non-discriminatory realization of human rights’.
To illustrate: In Egypt, the judiciary has been used as a tool in the ongoing crackdown on civil society, systematically failing to respect fair procedures. None of the individuals or organizations accused have thus far been permitted to view their entire case file, nor to present their defense before the investigative judges. Further, the court relied for its verdict on allegedly falsified investigations compiled by Egypt’s National Security Agency (NSA), and disregarded all material evidence presented by the defendants.
Such systematic attacks on civil society are not only illegal, but ill-advised and absolutely inimical to a State’s national interests, peace and prosperity.
We call on Egyptian authorities to immediately and unconditionally reverse the ruling and drop the investigation into case no. 173. We also stress that Egyptian human rights defenders need the support of this Council, particularly those States that have repeatedly expressed their commitment to protecting HRDs. We urge States to demonstrate their genuine leadership in this regard.”
Sep 26, 2016 | Новости, Статьи
Сегодня МКЮ в сотрудничестве с Институтом права и публичной политики (ИЛПП) провела круглый стол «Независимость, эффективность и качество правосудия: сравнительные перспективы» в Москве.
В мероприятии участвовали судьи из Норвегии, Нидерландов, Италии, а также юристы из России и Германии.
Комиссар МКЮ Судья Тамара Морщакова модерировала семинар.
Оценивая независимость судей, качество судебных решений и соблюдение судебных решений обсуждались среди других тем.
Повестку дня мероприятия можно скачать здесь, на английском.
Sep 26, 2016 | News
Today, the ICJ, in cooperation with the Institute of Law and Public Policy (ILPP) held a round table discussion “Independence, effectiveness and quality of justice: comparative perspectives” in Moscow.
Judges from Norway, the Netherlands, Italy and Russian and German legal scholars took part in the event.
ICJ Commissioner Justice Tamara Morschakova moderated the seminar.
Assessing the independence of judges, quality of judgements and enforcement of judgements were discussed among other topics.
The agenda of the event an be downloaded here.
