Poland: judges and lawyers from around the world condemn rapidly escalating rule of law crisis

Poland: judges and lawyers from around the world condemn rapidly escalating rule of law crisis

ICJ Commissioners and Honorary Members today denounced the rapidly escalating rule of law crisis in Poland, after a new law was passed that would result in harassment of judges upholding the independence of the judiciary.

A group of 44 ICJ Commissioners and Honorary Members, including senior judges, lawyers and legal scholars from around the world said in their statement “it is clear that the separation of powers, the independence of the judiciary, and the capacity of Polish judges to uphold the rule of law are now severely compromised. Judges’ freedom of expression, association and assembly are under immediate threat.”

The statement

The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), its Centre for the Independence of Judges and Lawyers (CIJL) and the undersigned Commissioners and Honorary Members of the ICJ are alarmed at the rapidly escalating rule of law crisis in Poland.

It is clear that the separation of powers, the independence of the judiciary, and the capacity of Polish judges to uphold the rule of law are now severely compromised.  Judges’ freedom of expression, association and assembly are under immediate threat.

The passing by the Sejm on 23 January of the amendments to the laws on the judiciary, and their signing into law on 4 February, means that judges will be prohibited from questioning the legitimacy or institutional independence of any Polish court, even where its members have been appointed through a politically controlled process, in violation of EU and international law.  Judges will face disciplinary action for denying the validity of any judicial appointment.

This law is an attempt to prevent any Polish court from upholding the independence of the judiciary, in the face of repeated legislative and government attacks on judicial independence in recent years.

This is directly contrary to the obligations of judges under the EU treaties to apply EU law, and would therefore lead to violations of Poland’s EU law obligations. It would also lead to violations of Poland’s obligations under international human rights law, since it would require judges to act contrary to their duty to uphold the right to a fair hearing before an independent and impartial tribunal.

As the Venice Commission noted in its recent opinion on the amendments, they are clearly “designed to have a nullifying effect” on recent judgments and resolutions of the Court of Justice of the EU and the Polish Supreme Court, which have called into question the validity of recent judicial appointments.  As such, they do severe damage to the rule of law in Poland.

These developments follow recent legislation which has politicised the National Council of the Judiciary (NCJ) and imposed executive control of the appointment process for judges of the Supreme Court, court presidents and other judges.  A powerful new Extraordinary Chamber as well as a Disciplinary Chamber of the Supreme Court, appointed under this new system, has further entrenched political control of the judiciary.

The ICJ, its undersigned Commissioners and Honorary Members, applaud the continued resolute defence of the rule of law by sections of the Polish judiciary. This has been evident in the resolution of the Supreme Court (Civil, Criminal, Labour and Social Security Divisions) of 23 January which found that recent judicial appointments meant that some Polish courts were not sufficiently independent to be legitimately constituted.

We deplore the response by President Adrzej Duda in which he suggested that judges opposing the judicial reforms on the judiciary acted out of improper self-interest.

The undersigned ICJ Commissioners and Honorary Members affirm their solidarity with Polish judges, in particular those who are currently facing abusive disciplinary or criminal proceedings for carrying out their judicial functions in accordance with the principle of judicial independence, or for exercising their freedom of expression, association or assembly as a means to defend the rule of law.

We recall that international human rights law and international standards on the judiciary require all branches of government to respect the independence of the judiciary. Furthermore, they recognise that judges have rights to freedom of expression and association and that they have a particularly important role in contributing to discussions on issues of the functioning of the judicial system and the rule of law, especially in defending the independence of the judiciary.

We call on the international community to respond to the Polish rule of law crisis in a manner appropriate to the gravity of the situation, before the damage to the Polish legal system becomes further entrenched.

In particular, we call on the European Union to urgently advance proceedings concerning Poland under Article 7 TEU, in light of the clear breach of EU law and EU fundamental values entailed by the new law, in conjunction with previous reforms, and by the government’s open defiance of decisions of the Court of Justice of the EU and the Polish Supreme Court.

Poland-Commissioners-Statement-Advocacy-Open-Letter-2020-ENG, (full text with all signatories, PDF)

 

 

Kazakhstan: ICJ observes disbarment case against the head of the Lawyer’s Rights Committee

Kazakhstan: ICJ observes disbarment case against the head of the Lawyer’s Rights Committee

Today, the ICJ has observed the trial in court proceedings against lawyer Amanzhol Mukhamediarov before the Yesil District Court in Nur-Sultan. Mukhamediarov, Chair of the Committee on the rights of lawyers of the Kazakhstan Bar Association, is facing disbarment following a lawsuit of by the Ministry of Justice of Kazakhstan.

Along with the case against Erlan Gazhymzhanov, who faces disbarment on the same set of facts, this case may raise issues of interference with freedom of expression of lawyers and possible interference in their work. This prompted ICJ to send a mission to observe court proceedings.

This hearing is observed on behalf of the ICJ by a lawyer from the Geneva Bar Association (Switzerland), Ms Xeniya Rivkin, as part of the International Cooperation Initiative project between the ICJ and the Geneva Bar Association.

The observer will carry out an assessment of the case based on the observation of the hearing in light of the materials of the case and the international law and standards on the role and independence of lawyers.

Read also

ICJ trial observation manual

Kazakhstan: ICJ observes hearing in lawyer’s disbarment case

Kazakhstan: frivolous disbarment proceedings against prominent lawyer Sergey Sizintsev should be immediately dropped, ICJ says

Kazakhstan: ICJ alarmed at government interference in legal profession

Kazakhstan: ICJ observes hearing in lawyer’s disbarment case

Kazakhstan: ICJ observes hearing in lawyer’s disbarment case

Today, the ICJ has conducted a trial observation in disbarment proceedings against lawyer Yerlan Gazymzhanov before the Saryarkyn Court of Nur-Sultan.

Erlan Gazymzhanov is facing disbarment following a lawsuit brought by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

The lawyer is accused of violating court rules by publishing on a social network an archive video from the hearing in a case in which he alleged inappropriate behaviour by the judge.

The case raises issues of the lawyer’s freedom of expression and possible improper interference in his work.

The ICJ will carry out an assessment of the case and its compliance with international standards following its observation of the proceedings.

Another lawyer, Amanzhol Mukhamedyarov is facing a disbarment lawsuit on the same allegations.

Mukhamedyarov’s case will be heard in separate proceedings on 4 February in Esil district court of Nursultan.

Dr Stefan Stobl, a lawyer from Munich (Germany) and a member of the ICJ Section Germany, observed today’s hearing on behalf of the ICJ.

Additional information:

Read ICJ’s trial observation manual

The ICJ has previously expressed concern about increasing restrictions on the independence of lawyers in Kazakhstan:

Kazakhstan: frivolous disbarment proceedings against prominent lawyer Sergey Sizintsev should be immediately dropped, ICJ says

Kazakhstan: ICJ alarmed at government interference in legal profession

Kazakhstan: the ICJ calls to immediately drop prosecution of lawyer Bauyrzhan Azanov

Turkey: workshop “Towards an alternative Justice Reform Strategy”

Turkey: workshop “Towards an alternative Justice Reform Strategy”

Today begins in Ankara (Turkey) a one-day workshop for lawyers and CSO practitioners to discuss and brainstorm on an alternative Justice Reform Strategy.

This event is organized by ICJ, in cooperation with its partners Kapasite Geliştirme Derneği and Human Rights Joint Platform, as part of a EU co-financed project Rebuilding and Ensuring Access to justice with civil society in Turkey.

The workshop aims at discussing the key reforms proposed by the Government of Turkey in its Judicial Reform Strategy and provide with an assessment and an alternative plan for reform based on international standards and jurisprudence on access to justice and the independence of the judiciary.

The workshop will provide presentations on international standards on the judiciary as well as on access to justice for human rights violations. It will produce a ten point strategy document to propose reforms that will uphold the independence of the judiciary and access to justice in Turkey.

The project is funded by the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) of the European Union.

Turkey-Workshop-Agenda-AltJRS-Ankara-2019-eng (download the agenda)

Translate »