Falta de independencia judicial en Central America preocupa a juristas
Jueces europeos y centroamericanos expresaron en Tegucigalpa su preocupación por la falta de independencia del sistema judicial en países como Honduras, Guatemala y El Salvador.
Instaron a los Estados a tomar medidas para garantizar la autonomía de esa rama del poder público.
El 31 de octubre y 1 de noviembre se llevó a cabo en la ciudad de Tegucigalpa (Honduras) el foro denominado “Encuentro de Juristas Europeos y Centroamericanos: experiencias sobre la defensa de la independencia judicial”.
Durante el mismo, se tuvo la oportunidad de intercambiar experiencias en torno a las amenazas que hoy día persisten en contra de la independencia judicial y las medidas que los estados de Centroamérica deben tomar para fortalecer los diferentes sistemas de justicia en la región.
El foro reconoce el papel fundamental que tienen todos los jueces y juezas en la construcción y consolidación de la Democracia y el Estado de Derecho en Centroamérica; las y los participantes expresan su preocupación porque aún existen serias amenazas a la independencia judicial, entendiéndose dicha independencia como una garantía para los ciudadanos y ciudadanas.
En tal sentido, los estados centroamericanos deben respetar plenamente la independencia del Poder Judicial.
Honduras-Foro Jueces Independencia en CA-news-web story-2013-spa (full text in pdf)
ICJ welcomes UN expert report on military tribunals
The ICJ welcomes the report of the UN Special Rapporteur on the independence of judges and lawyers presented to the UN General Assembly today.
The report calls for the adoption by the Human Rights Council of the draft principles governing the administration of justice through military tribunals, known as the ‘Decaux Principles’.
“This is a major step forward towards the establishment of universally applicable minimum standards to regulate the use and operation of military courts and tribunals”, said Alex Conte, Director of the ICJ’s International Law and Protection Programmes.
“The investigation and prosecution of alleged offences involving serious human rights violations is in many countries undertaken by military courts for the purpose of avoiding the accountability of perpetrators of such acts. It is therefore significant that the UN Special Rapporteur has reaffirmed that the jurisdiction of ordinary courts should prevail in such cases,” he added.
“It is also important that the Special Rapporteur has reiterated the recommendation of many human rights experts that the trial of civilians in military courts should in principle not occur and should be limited to strictly exceptional cases,” Conte further said.
The ICJ closely followed and contributed to the development of the Decaux Principles and has repeatedly called for their adoption and implementation by all States.
These principles were elaborated in 2006 in consultation with human rights experts, jurists and military personnel from throughout the world, and include specific provisions relating to the establishment and functioning of military tribunals.
They are based on the principle that military justice should be an integral part of the normal judicial system and should operate in a way that guarantees full compliance with human rights, including the need to ensure accountability for perpetrators of human rights violations.
Contact:
Alex Conte, ICJ International Law and Protection Programmes Director (Geneva), t: +41 79 957 2733; email: alex.conte(a)icj.org
Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: ICJ joins mission to support the Optional Protocol in Africa
The international NGO coalition for the OP to the ICESCR supports national initiatives to promote ratification in Africa.
The International Coalition for the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights ended today a one-week support mission to promote the ratification of the Protocol in West Africa.
Although the group of African States played a fundamental role in the elaboration of the Protocol, none of them have yet ratified this instrument that will give the possibility to victims of violations of ESCR to have their case examined by the UN Committee in charge.
On 21 and 22 October in Cotonou, Benin, two members of the International Coalition, Amnesty International and the International Commission of Jurists, supported national actors, including the Coalition béninoise pour les DESC, Amnesty International-Benin, the Chaire UNESCO-Benin, in the organization of a high-level roundtable discussion to welcome the signature by the State of Benin of the Optional Protocol to the ICESCR on 24 September 2013 and to encourage the State to move quickly towards the ratification of the instrument.
The initiative benefitted from the participation of two Ministers, the Minister of Justice and Human Rights and the Minister in charge of the relations with the institutions, as well as from the support of additional partners including the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.
From 24 to 26 October, and with the support of the International Coalition, a group of national civil society organized in Sokodé (about 400 km from Togo’s capital Lome) a national gathering to discuss the international standards on ESCR, the promotion and protection mechanisms for these rights, including the procedures under the Protocol.
Fifty-two participants from more than 30 civil society organizations from all parts of the country took part in this event.
Following the discussions, the organizers – the Plateforme DESC-Togo, GRADSE, RAPDA-Togo, FETAPH, WILDAF-Togo, FLORAISON et AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL-Togo, in collaboration with the International Commission of Jurists, the OHCHR, Amnesty International and Terre des Hommes France – established an action plan for the promotion and protection of ESCR in the country, including the monitoring of key recommendations of the CESCR and the ratification of the Optional Protocol.
Guatemala: encuentro de comunidades, dirigentes comunitarios, defensores de derechos humanos y organizaciones sociales concluye
Los días 22, 23 y 24 de octubre se reunieron en el Departamento de Petén diferentes comunidades, dirigentes comunitarios, defensores de derechos humanos y organizaciones sociales.
El objetivo de la reunion fue evaluar la situación de las comunidades que viven en los municipios de San Andrés y La Libertad, de dicho departamento.
Entre otras organizaciones y dirigentes del departamento de Petén, estuvieron presentes las organizaciones Unión Verapacense de Organizaciones Campesinas (UVOC) y el Comité de Desarrollo Campesino (CODECA), ambas integrantes de la Coordinadora Nacional de Organizaciones Campesinas (CNOC); dirigentes del Frente de Resistencia en Defensa de los Recursos Naturales y Derechos de los Pueblos (FRENA) del Departamento de San Marcos y dirigentes de la Sociedad Civil de Santa Cruz Barillas del Departamento de Huehuetenango; representantes del Bufete de Derechos Humanos (BDH), representantes de El Observador y de la Oficina de la Comisión Internacional de Juristas (CIJ) para Centroamérica.
Después de realizar varios talleres, reuniones, análisis y reflexión sobre la situación de derechos humanos en dichos municipios, las organizaciones mencionadas pudieron constatar que continúa la política de persecución, represión y hostigamiento en contra de las comunidades y de sus dirigentes y pobladores, por el hecho de que sus comunidades quedaron en áreas declaradas “protegidas” en la década de los años noventa.
Muchos dirigentes están sufriendo amenazas por parte de las autoridades estatales, mientras el Ejército de Guatemala mantiene diferentes “retenes” que sirven para amedrentar a las poblaciones y a sus dirigentes y para evitar que trasladen alimentos y medicinas a sus comunidades.
El Concejo Nacional de Áreas Protegidas (CONAP) pretende obligar a las comunidades que viven en zonas protegidas a firmar “Acuerdos de Cooperación”, que resultan lesivos a sus intereses y que no otorgan seguridad jurídica sobre la propiedad y posesión de sus tierras. Al resistirse a firmar dichos acuerdos, representantes de CONAP amenazan a las comunidades y a sus dirigentes con implementar desalojos forzosos en su contra y en contra de sus comunidades.
Esta actitud contrasta con la política gubernamental hacia la compañía petrolera PERENCO, a la cual durante la gestión del ex Presidente Álvaro Colom, se le prorrogó el contrato petrolero por 15 años más a partir del año 2010, aún en contra de preceptos constitucionales e internacionales. Además, recientemente el Gobierno concesionó seis licencias más de exploración petrolera, algunas en áreas protegidas, a favor de diferentes empresas privadas en los Departamentos de Petén, Quiché, Huehuetenango e Izabal.
El Departamento de Petén es uno de los más afectados por las políticas de desalojos forzosos del Estado de Guatemala.
Guatemala-NOTA INFORMATIVA PETEN-web story-2013-spa (full text in Spanish, pdf)
Spain: ICJ welcomes European Court ruling in Del Rio Prada case
The ICJ welcomes today’s ruling by the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Inés Del Rio Prada, affirming that changes made retroactively to the remission of her sentence violated her rights.
The ICJ, which intervened as third-party in the case, says the judgment reinforces and makes effective the principle of non-retroactivity of criminal law, an essential element of the rule of law.
“This is a highly significant judgment that affirms and strengthens the rule of law in criminal sentencing,” said Róisín Pillay, Director of the ICJ Europe Programme. “Rules and practices that have a significant impact on the calculation and remission of sentences must not be applied retroactively to the detriment of a convicted person.”
“The key principle that the Grand Chamber has upheld today is that the rules that apply to the calculation of the sentence to be served, must be clear and foreseeable under the law at the time of conviction. Subsequent re-interpretation by the courts cannot fundamentally revise the principles that apply to a sentence already handed down. While States have the responsibility for setting sentencing rules for crimes, any changes to those rules which would result in an increased penalty must not applied retroactively in breach of (Article 7 of) the European Convention on Human Rights,” she added.
BACKGROUND:
Inés Del Rio Prada had been convicted of terrorism offences and sentenced to a total of over 3,000 years of imprisonment.
According to Spanish sentencing rules in force at the time, this theoretical sentence was tantamount to an effective sentence of 30 years imprisonment.
While at that time, the benefit of sentence reduction for work performed in prison was applied to the 30-year period, in 2008 the Spanish courts decided to deduct such benefits from the 3,000 years of nominal imprisonment instead, thereby significantly reducing their impact, and leading to a considerably longer sentence in the case of the applicant.
In its judgment, the Grand Chamber held that the application of changes to Spanish sentencing rules as applied to applicant Inés Del Rio Prada had violated the prohibition on retroactive penalties guaranteed in Article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
It held that a 2006 decision of the Spanish Supreme Court, which altered the system of calculation of maximum terms of sentences, leading to reduced remission of sentences for work done in prison, constituted a retroactive redefinition of the sentence previously imposed, which could not have been foreseen.
As such, the Court held that Spain had violated its obligations under article 7 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
The Court also found that the applicant’s continued detention violated the right to liberty under Article 5(1) ECHR, and required her release at the earliest possible date.
Contact:
Róisín Pillay, Director, ICJ Europe Programme, t +32 2 734 8446; e-mail : roísín.pillay(a)icj.org
Read also:
Third Party Intervention in Del Rio Prada v. Spain
Recent News
Thailand: Joint statement urges Thai authorities to drop charges against human rights defender Pimsiri Petchnamrob and end judicial harassment of peaceful protesters18 Jun 2025
HRC59: Statement on the High Commissioner’s report – addressing accountability gaps in Sri Lanka, Libya, and global attacks on justice17 Jun 2025
HRC59: Joint statement on the report of Special Rapporteur in Afghanistan16 Jun 2025
Israel/Iran: Israel’s attack on Iran violates international law, threatening peace and security13 Jun 2025