Human rights and corporate accountability in South Sudan

Human rights and corporate accountability in South Sudan

The ICJ and Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada have highlighted the link between human rights violations and corporate accountability in South Sudan, at the Human Rights Council in Geneva.

The statement, delivered in an interactive dialogue with the Commission on Human Rights in South Sudan, read as follows:

“The International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) and Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada thank the Commission on Human Rights in South Sudan for its report (A/HRC/43/56).

We underline the Commission’s ongoing concerns about lack of access to justice, entrenched impunity for serious crimes and human rights violations; continued threats against human rights defenders, journalists, and dissidents; and corruption in oil and non-oil sectors.

We appreciate the Commission’s continued investigation into enforced disappearances, including the 2017 enforced disappearances and extrajudicial killings of human rights lawyer Dong Samuel Luak and opposition politician Aggrey Idri.

We remain concerned by the lack of effective oversight of oil and non-oil enterprises and revenue misappropriation that has fueled violations. In the light of the findings by the Commission’s 2019 report (A/HRC/40/69, A/HRC/40/CRP.1) pointing to the oil industry as a “major driver” in the continuation of the armed conflict and resulting human rights violations, we would like to ask what follow up to those findings does the Commission intend to conduct in the future?

Potential corporate complicity with crimes under international law demands investigation and a strong monitoring mechanism for the use of oil revenues should be established.”

Forum on indigenous & other traditional or customary justice systems in Africa

Forum on indigenous & other traditional or customary justice systems in Africa

For the 10th annual Geneva Forum of Judges and Lawyers, the ICJ has partnered with the International Development Law Organization and the ICJ Kenya Section, to organise in Nairobi a high-level regional Forum on alternative dispute resolution and indigenous and other traditional or customary justice systems in Africa.

Under the auspices of the Judiciary of Kenya, the “Regional Forum on Alternative Dispute Resolution & Customary and Informal Justice: Advancing SDG16 and Pathways to Justice” will provide a platform to allow for a deeper reflection on access to justice through alternative and indigenous or other traditional or customary justice systems, providing greater insight into local realities, concerns and approaches and exploring existing lessons, illustrations, and good practices.

The Forum will also facilitate the identification of culturally appropriate, people-centered, sustainable and effective paths for policy and programming that reduce existing justice gaps as well as address challenges in diverse contexts.

Invited justice champions from national governments, the formal and informal justice sectors, and civil society will share insights on ongoing justice sector reforms and policy development that aim to provide alternatives to or complement formal courts, curb rights-abrogating practices, and contribute to inclusive and peaceful societies.

A concept note is available in PDF format here: NairobiConferenceConceptNote

The programme is available in PDF format here: NairobiConferenceAgenda

The final report of the Forum is available in PDF format here.

The Forum is made possible with support from the Government of the Netherlands and the Republic and Canton of Geneva.

For further background on the ICJ Geneva Forum of Judges and Lawyers, and its ongoing global project on indigenous and other traditional or customary justice systems, click here.

A compilation of international sources is available here.

For more information contact matt.pollard(a)icj.org

Canada: Supreme Court affirms that Eritreans can seek redress against Canadian Company for human rights abuses

Canada: Supreme Court affirms that Eritreans can seek redress against Canadian Company for human rights abuses

The ICJ today welcomed the judgement of the Canadian Supreme Court in the Case of Araya v, Nevsun, which allows a civil lawsuit by a group of Eritrean plaintiffs to proceed against Canadian company Nevsun Resources Ltd. for its alleged involvement in forced labour, slavery, torture and other serious human rights abuses against plaintiffs.

The ICJ together with Amnesty International-Canada intervened in the case as a third party, arguing that Canada’s common law should be read in a manner consistent with the right to an effective remedy for human rights violations under international law and the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

“This judgment is a landmark achievement for workers and other victims of human rights violations as well for international rule of law and justice,” said Carlos Lopez, Senior Legal adviser at the ICJ.

“The Supreme Court of Canada has shown that misapplied legal doctrine should not stand in the way of people’s right to effective remedy and reparations,” he added.

In the case, the Supreme Court of Canada  rejected the company’s contention that the “act of state doctrine” would preclude the case from going forward.

The Court concluded that this doctrine is not in fact part of Canadian law.

The company also contended that the allegations of breach of customary international law  could only be applicable to States and not to the company itself.

The Court, however, held that customary international law, including customary human rights law, is part of Canadian law and could apply to Nevsun as a corporate entity.

In a significant victory for the plaintiffs and other similarly situated alleged victims, the Supreme Court has allowed the case to proceed, dismissing jurisdictional and procedural objections from Nevsun.

The proceedings before the Supreme Court originated in an appeal by the defendant company Nevsun Resources Ltd against the British Columbia Court of Appeal’s judgment of 2017 which upheld the rights of claimants to sue in Canada.

The claim filed in 2015 argued that Nevsun Resources was involved in various ways in the practice of forced labour, slavery, torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, and crimes against humanity at the Bisha mine (picture) against hundreds of Eritreans who were conscripted into the Eritrean National Service Programme and forced to working in the mine operated jointly by Nevsun and Eritrean State companies.

The claimants were allegedly forced to work in the Bisha mine and fled the country to find refuge in Canada, where they sued Nevsun.

Translate »