ICJ condemns “blacklisting” of judges

ICJ condemns “blacklisting” of judges

In a letter addressed to President Bush, the ICJ expressed its alarm at a directive by Attorney General John Ashcroft to federal prosecutors to report judges who depart from U.S. sentencing guidelines to the Justice Department.

Fair trial for all Guantanamo Bay detainees, particularly appeal rights

Fair trial for all Guantanamo Bay detainees, particularly appeal rights

JUSTICE (British Section of the ICJ) called on the Attorney General to press for fair trials for all Guantanamo detainees and, in particular, appeal rights to civilian courts as envisaged by international human rights obligations.

JUSTICE welcomes the commitment of the Attorney General to establishing fair trail rights but is concerned that, despite concessions, the current arrangements for the proposed military commissions still fall far short of ensuring a fair trial for detainees according to international human rights standards. In particular, both the US and the UK are parties to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Article 14 of the Covenant states that “everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law”. Under the current rules for military commissions, all trials and appeals would be heard by military personnel appointed by the US Department of Defense, and any final appeal would be determined by the US President himself.

In addition, JUSTICE argues that the UK government should meet the costs of the civilian legal representation of the defendants.

Eric Metcalfe, JUSTICE’s Director of Human Rights Policy, said:

“The Attorney General has correctly argued for ‘fair trials that meet recognised principles’. The US must guarantee, as an absolute minimum, that all detainees have a right of appeal to a civilian court and the UK government should press for this until it is granted. The right to independent judicial review lies at the heart of the right to a fair trial.”

United Kingdom-Guantanamo Bay detainees-press release-2003 (text, PDF)

 

Lawrence v. Texas, United States Supreme Court (26 June 2003)

Procedural Posture The defendants were convicted of “anal sex with a member of the same sex” in violation of Section 21.06 of the Texas Penal Code. At trial, they challenged the law on the grounds that it violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment of...
Translate »