On 24 October, the Ontario Superior Court held that the definition of “terrorist activity” in the 2001 Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) violated freedoms of religion, expression and association guaranteed under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Court struck down the part of the definition that required a political, religious, or ideological objective or cause. On 19 October, the same court held that some provisions of the Security of Information Act (SIA), amended in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, violated freedom of expression and the media by allowing the Government to arbitrarily classify information and to punish those who communicate or confirm such information.
Recent News
South Africa: Constitutional Court’s affirmation that principles of judicial independence are fully applicable to military courts is a welcome step forward
09 May 2025EU: Lawyers and civil society call for mandatory humanitarian clause in anti-smuggling directive
09 May 2025EU: Access to a lawyer in juvenile justice proceedings remains a key concern in several EU Member States
07 May 2025- Tunisia: Arbitrarily detained lawyer Ahmed Souab must be released and criminal charges dropped06 May 2025