On 26 November, a panel of nine Supreme Court judges unanimously upheld the route of the separation wall in the West Bank, in a case in which the Palestinian petitioners claimed that the wall violated their property rights and their economic, social and cultural rights. The Israeli Government has defended the construction of the wall as necessary to prevent terrorist attacks. The Court held that the balance between the degree of security obtained for Israeli citizens and the injury to the rights of the Palestinians was proportional. In 2004, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) found that the construction of the wall violated international law.
ICJ Advisory OpinionRecent News
The UN Human Rights Council makes significant but limited progress in addressing human rights around the world, as atrocities multiply in the Middle East and elsewhere02 Apr 2026
ICJ hosts an African Regional Convening in Kenya on Transformative Equality Jurisprudence31 Mar 2026
Russian Federation: Arbitrarily detained human rights lawyer Maria Bontsler must be released30 Mar 2026
ICJ Oral statement at HRC urgent debate on protection of children and schools in armed conflict27 Mar 2026
