On 7 May, the Supreme Court found that the Presidential proclamation of a state of national emergency and its implementing Order of 24 February were in accordance with the Constitution. The declaration was made after the failure of an alleged plot to overthrow the Government. The state of emergency was lifted on 3 March. The Court declared unconstitutional the Order’s provisions which mandated the armed forces and the police to prevent and suppress “acts of terrorism” because the law did not define such acts. The Court also found certain acts committed under the state of emergency to be illegal, such as arrests and searches without warrant.
JudgmentRecent News
Myanmar: As armed conflict rages and military rule continues, critical measures can be taken towards eventual justice and accountability for victims of Enforced Disappearance10 Sep 2026
HRC63: ICJ Raises Alarm over Repression in Tunisia and Arbitrary Detention in El Salvador09 Sep 2026
HRC63: ICJ Calls for Protection of Lawyers and Accountability in Myanmar07 Sep 2026
More than fifty years on: enforced disappearance, the families who named it, and the reframing of international protection26 Aug 2026
