On 4 June, two military judges rejected cases against Salim Hamdan and Omar Khadr on the ground that military commissions did not have jurisdiction over O. Khadr and S. Hamdan, as they had been classified as “enemy combatants” and not “unlawful enemy combatants”. On 4 July, the Pentagon prosecutors filed an appeal in the case of Omar Khadr to the new Court of Military Commissions Review, claiming that the designation of “enemy combatant” is sufficient to establish jurisdiction, and that in any case a military judge can determine the status of “unlawful enemy combatant”.
HRW Press ReleaseRecent News
Myanmar: As armed conflict rages and military rule continues, critical measures can be taken towards eventual justice and accountability for victims of Enforced Disappearance10 Sep 2026
HRC63: ICJ Raises Alarm over Repression in Tunisia and Arbitrary Detention in El Salvador09 Sep 2026
HRC63: ICJ Calls for Protection of Lawyers and Accountability in Myanmar07 Sep 2026
More than fifty years on: enforced disappearance, the families who named it, and the reframing of international protection26 Aug 2026
