On 4 June, two military judges rejected cases against Salim Hamdan and Omar Khadr on the ground that military commissions did not have jurisdiction over O. Khadr and S. Hamdan, as they had been classified as “enemy combatants” and not “unlawful enemy combatants”. On 4 July, the Pentagon prosecutors filed an appeal in the case of Omar Khadr to the new Court of Military Commissions Review, claiming that the designation of “enemy combatant” is sufficient to establish jurisdiction, and that in any case a military judge can determine the status of “unlawful enemy combatant”.
HRW Press ReleaseRecent News
Nepal: Protesters Demand Integrity, Rights, Rule of Law
13 Sep 2025India: Joint statement urging Indian authorities to immediately and unconditionally release human rights defender and student activist Umar Khalid
12 Sep 2025HRC60: Statement by the International Commission of Jurists in the Interactive Dialogue with the UN Special Rapporteur on truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence
10 Sep 2025HRC60: International Commission of Jurists in the General Debate under Item 2
10 Sep 2025