On 28 November, a district court ruled that parts of the Executive Order authorizing the freezing of assets of suspected terrorists and terrorist organizations, were vague and therefore unconstitutional. The Order, issued by the President in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, gave the President broad authority to designate organizations and individuals as terrorist without any criteria and authorized the Secretary of Treasury to designate those “otherwise associated” with a designated terrorist group. The case was brought on behalf of the Humanitarian Law Project, an NGO seeking to provide human rights advocacy training to the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) in Turkey and several other organizations seeking to support humanitarian activities of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in Sri Lanka.
Press ArticleRecent News
Nepal: Protesters Demand Integrity, Rights, Rule of Law
13 Sep 2025India: Joint statement urging Indian authorities to immediately and unconditionally release human rights defender and student activist Umar Khalid
12 Sep 2025HRC60: Statement by the International Commission of Jurists in the Interactive Dialogue with the UN Special Rapporteur on truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence
10 Sep 2025HRC60: International Commission of Jurists in the General Debate under Item 2
10 Sep 2025