OHCHR database of businesses involved in settlements in OPT (UN Statement)

OHCHR database of businesses involved in settlements in OPT (UN Statement)

The ICJ today spoke at the Human Rights Council about the creation of a UN database of business enterprises involved in Israeli settlements in the Occupied Palestinian Terrority (OPT).

The statement, delivered in general debate under item 7 of the Council agenda, read as follows:

“Regarding the Report on a Database of business enterprises involved in listed activities in the settlements on the Occupied Palestinian Territory (A/HRC/37/39), the ICJ recognizes that considerable progress has been made, but considers that the normative and methodological frameworks of the database would benefit from incorporating an analysis of corporate complicity under international law, in addition to the existing references to the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

The ICJ stresses that a transparent process and strong due process safeguards in relation to companies alleged to be involved are essential and notes the efforts of the OHCHR in this regard.

All States, including the home States of the companies involved, have a responsibility to prevent companies from operating in breach of international law. Businesses themselves should see the database as an opportunity to more proactively incorporate respect for human rights within their policies and operations.

The database should contribute to global efforts to hold all business enterprises accountable for their role in violations of human rights and humanitarian law. Indeed, the ICJ urges all States, including those that have supported the creation of this database, to support and give due attention to addressing the human rights impacts of businesses in their own territories as well as global operations of businesses for which they are the home State.”

Video of the statement is available here:

Towards a treaty on business and human rights (UN Statement)

Towards a treaty on business and human rights (UN Statement)

The ICJ today delivered an oral statement to the UN Human Rights Council, highlighting the need for substantive discussions towards a treaty on business and human rights to be transparent, broad-based with clear timelines.

The statement, which was made during the General Debate on item 3 with the Human Rights Council, read as follows:

Mr President,

Regarding the “Report on the third session of the open-ended intergovernmental working group on transnational corporations and other business enterprises with respect to human rights” (A/HRC/37/67), the ICJ notes with satisfaction the holding of the third session and congratulates the participants, especially the wide participation of civil society groups. The ICJ calls on States from all regions to engage meaningfully in the important work of the OEWG.

The discussions during the third session confirm the need for an international treaty in the area of business and human rights to fill the existing normative and legal protection gaps. Recent years have seen little improvement in this area despite the growing State and business discourse about policies and commitments. Harassment and attacks on human rights defenders that work in the area of corporate accountability have increased and the difficulties for victims of abuse to have access to an effective judicial remedy persist, especially at the transnational level.

The ICJ calls for a transparent and broad-based consultation process with clear timelines to move in the direction of a draft treaty on the basis of the document “Elements for a treaty” presented by the Chairperson –Rapporteur. The ICJ calls on all States and stakeholders to engage responsibly in this process to enable the fourth session of the Working Group to focus on substantive negotiations overcoming divisions on procedure and politics.

Thank you.

Side Event at the Human Rights Council: State of emergency in Turkey; implications for the protection from torture

Side Event at the Human Rights Council: State of emergency in Turkey; implications for the protection from torture

This side event at the Human Rights Council takes place on Friday, 2 March, 10:00-11:30, room XXI of the Palais des Nations.  It is organized by the World Organization Against Torture (OMCT) and co-sponsored by the ICJ.

On January 18 Turkey extended the state of emergency for the sixth time since it was initially imposed following a failed coup attempt in July 2016.

Current emergency measures grant highly discretionary powers to the executive and its administrative authorities in many areas, in derogation from human rights safeguards and rule of law principles, posing great challenges for the protection from torture.

On the occasion of the release of the Special Rapporteur on Torture’s country visit report on Turkey, this side-event, organized by the World Organisation Against Torture (OMCT) in partnership with Human Rights Watch (HRW) and the International Commission of Jurists (ICJ), aims to discuss the implications of the state of emergency on the fight against torture in Turkey and to provide recommendations to ensure that the emergency measures do not become permanent.

The panel discussion will be followed by a Q&A session with the public.

Panelists:

  • Nils Melzer

UN Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman, or Degrading Treatment

  • Osman İşçi

Human Rights Association in Turkey (IHD)/Euromed Rights’s Executive Committee Member

  • Massimo Frigo

Senior Legal Adviser, International Commission of Jurists (ICJ)

Moderator:

Stella Anastasia

Human Rights Adviser World Organization Against Torture (OMCT)

 

Turkey – Protection from Torture – News – Events – 2018 – ENG (flyer in PDF)

 

 

On video: ICJ’s visit to Carbones del Cerrejón in Colombia

On video: ICJ’s visit to Carbones del Cerrejón in Colombia

From 9-13 December, a delegation from the ICJ visited the company Carbones del Cerrejón LLC (El Cerrejón) to analyse the operation and effectiveness of its grievance mechanism.

The company, owned by Glencore plc, Anglo American and BHP Billiton, is located in the department of La Guajira, Colombia. The visit took place within the framework of the ICJ’s initiative on the effectiveness of grievance mechanisms established by companies to remedy negative impacts and human rights abuses.

The ICJ appreciated the collaboration of the Institute of Studies for Development and Peace (INDEPAZ) in the organization and facilitation of the visit.

It also acknowledges and thanks the company Carbones del Cerrejón for the welcome and all the facilities provided to the mission as well as the information shared with the delegation.

The ICJ also thanks the communities of Afro-descendants, peasants and indigenous Wayuu who welcomed and spoke with it.

This statement contains preliminary views and recommendations from the delegation regarding the company’s grievance system and the context in which it operates.

Subsequently, the ICJ will prepare a full report and will use this evaluation in the context of a general evaluation and recommendations on operational level grievance mechanisms.

The objective of the mission was to learn about and analyse the operation of the grievance mechanism established by the company and to evaluate in a preliminary way its effectiveness.

Cerrejón is one of the companies in the coal mining sector that started the process of establishing grievance and / or complaint mechanisms early.

Between 2009 and 2011 it was part of five pilot projects carried out by a team of the Special Representative of the UN Secretary General on business and human rights.

Contextualize the mechanism: Coal mining in La Guajira

La Guajira – province of Colombia on the border with Venezuela – besides its natural beauty and the friendliness of its people surprises visitors by the sharp contrast it presents between the great wealth generated by the extraction of coal and the poverty prevalent among its population.

The majority percentage of the population of La Guajira is made up of indigenous Wayuu populations and Afro-descendant communities, who generally live in poverty.

There is a lack of water and of employment opportunities or economic activities that are not linked to the operations of El Cerrejón, which accentuates the apparent dependence of the regional economy on the extractive activity of coal and raises doubts and questions about sustainability of the regional economy sitting on these bases in the short, medium and long term.

The information received by the delegation of the ICJ points to corruption as one of the main factors that influence and determine the lack of better health and education services, infrastructure and economic investment in the region by the State.

Corruption is more visible among the political class. Senior officials of the regional government were or are currently being prosecuted for corruption and murder.

La Guajira has had eight different governors in five years, which is a destabilizing and paralyzing factor in a highly centralized political system of government.

In this context, although considerable efforts are made by various actors, including El Cerrejón, distrust among the population is significant.

El Cerrejón, which operates in La Guajira, is one of the largest open-pit coal mining operations in the world and has an integrated operation that includes the extraction of coal, its transport by private railroad to Puerto Bolivar (150 kilometers away) and its cargo and transportation to consumer countries.

About 40 percent of the coal exported by Colombia goes to European markets. El Cerrejón is presented as an example of responsible mining both in the Colombian coal mining region and in the world and it has recently developed a series of social responsibility policies, including a due diligence process in the field of human rights.

The ICJ was informed that the experience and lessons learned from the grievance mechanism have influenced the design of these policies.

Colombia-Cerrejon-grievance-assessment-News-2018-ENG (Full text in PDF)

Watch the video (in Spanish):

Translate »