A. A., A.A., A.A., and M.A., Supreme Administrative Court of the Czech Republic, Decision No. 2 Azs 275/2022-34, 16 June 2023
In this case, the first applicant, an adult, was detained under the Dublin Regulation, while his three minor cousins were placed in the same facility. The Supreme Administrative Court quashed the detention decision, referencing a previous ruling (No. III.ÚS 3289/14),...B. G., A. G., and R. G., Constitutional Court of the Czech Republic, Decision No. III.ÚS 3289/14, 10 May 2017
In this case, a family from Kosovo, which included two young children, was detained in the Czech Republic while traveling on their way to Germany after seeking asylum in Hungary. They were held for 50 days in a detention center pending transfer under the Dublin...Supreme Court of Poland, Decision II KK 148/22, 20 June 2023
The Polish Supreme Court ruled that a refugee who had been wrongfully placed in a refugee camp is entitled to claim compensation from public authorities.
District Court of Olsztyn, Decision VII Kz 372/21, 30 July 2021
The Court stated that a prolongation of a parents and their child’s stay in a guarded centre for foreigners was not warranted as the lengthening of the asylum procedure was not of their doing. The court moreover referred itself to the best interest of the child. The...Recent News
Tajikistan: Legal and institutional reforms are required to meet international human rights obligations on GBV05 Dec 2025
Civil Society Joint Statement: Germany’s surrender of El Hishri to the ICC is a turning point for accountability in the Libya Situation03 Dec 2025
Tunisia: “Conspiracy Case” appeal proceedings a travesty of justice02 Dec 2025
EU: Unaccompanied children must not be placed in asylum border procedures01 Dec 2025