Myanmar: Rakhine State crisis demands full government commitment to protecting human rights of all

Myanmar: Rakhine State crisis demands full government commitment to protecting human rights of all

The Government of Myanmar must do everything in its power to respect and protect human rights during military operations in northern Rakhine State, said the ICJ today.

These military operations have reportedly resulted in widespread unlawful killing and the displacement of more than 200,000 people in response to attacks attributed to ARSA.

The ICJ called on Myanmar’s government to act as swiftly as possible to address the root causes of violence, discrimination and under-development in Rakhine, as well as for enhanced engagement by the international community in efforts to effectively address the situation, and to take measures to ensure that security operations are conducted in accordance with international human rights standards.

The military operations follow attacks by ARSA on August 25 on police posts and a military base in which at least 12 police, military and government officials were killed, along with a large number of attackers (according to government figures).

In the wake of the attacks on 25 August, the military launched what it has termed as a “clearance operation,” and the government announced that parts of northern Rakhine State have been designated as a “military operations area.”

“The attacks attributed to ARSA constitute serious crimes for which individual perpetrators should be brought to account through fair trials conducted in accordance with international standards,” said Sam Zarifi, ICJ’s Secretary General.

“But ‘clearance operations’ carried out by the Tatmadaw (Myanmar’s military) in an unlawful manner, and allegations of serious human rights violations, many amounting to crimes under international law, are on an entirely different scale and cannot be justified in the name of security or countering terrorism. These allegations must be promptly investigated in light of the Tatmadaw’s decades-long record of grave human rights violations and impunity throughout Myanmar,” he added.

“The Tatmadaw is responsible for the conduct of security operations in Rakhine as in other parts of the country, but the entire government remains responsible for upholding its international legal obligations to protect the rights of everyone living in Rakhine State – including the Rohingya Muslim communities that constitute the overwhelming majority of the population in the areas most affected by the violence,” Zarifi said.

“We also urge the State Counsellor Aung San Suu Kyi to use her immense electoral popularity and moral stature to push for full respect for human rights for the Rohingya as well as all others in Rakhine State.”

In the wake of the attacks on 25 August, the military launched what it has termed as a “clearance operation,” and the government announced that parts of northern Rakhine State have been designated as a “military operations area.”

These terms are not clearly prescribed in Myanmar’s laws, but in practice seem to be used to grant the military authority to ignore legal protections afforded under the country’s constitution and international standards.

“Whatever descriptive cover may be used to describe security operations, they must scrupulously respect international standards on the use of force.” Zarifi said.

“Myanmar’s government has the right, indeed the obligation, to protect all people in its jurisdiction from attacks by armed groups, but it must do so in conformity with international law. Experience from around the world has shown that greater respect for rule of law and human rights is the most effective response to terrorism,” he added.

This was unfortunately not the case following the arrests and detentions carried out during the military operations that followed attacks in October 2016.

Many of these arrests appear arbitrary and unlawful, as detainees were not given access to legal counsel, and deaths in custody have not been properly investigated.

Similar violations by the military have been documented recently in Shan and Kachin States.

Government authorities must ensure that arrest and detention in the context of the current operations in Rakhine State be conducted in accordance with national and international law, and respect the rights to liberty, freedom from arbitrary detention and a fair trial.

The most effective way for the government to respond to allegations of abuse by the security forces both in Rakhine and elsewhere in the country would be to take well-founded allegations seriously, and ensure that they are promptly, impartially and thoroughly investigated and those responsibility are brought to justice.

It is an unfortunate fact that investigations and prosecutions of human rights violations are rarely undertaken in regular courts, as national laws shield security forces from public criminal prosecutions, often by using military or special police courts.

Zarifi further said: “Ending the military’s impunity would establish much needed confidence in the government’s commitment to upholding the rule of law.”

“One immediate way to illustrate this commitment would be to cooperate with the UN Fact Finding Mission, which the ICJ and other organizations called for earlier in the year, to investigate allegations of human rights violations and abuses in Myanmar.”

“There are paths forward for the government to both respond to allegations of rights violations, and to show its commitment to finding solutions to the unacceptable state of affairs in Rakhine State.”

Myanmar-RakhineStateCrisis-PressReleases-2017-ENG (full press release)

 

 

 

 

Uzbekistan: Supreme Judicial Council and ICJ hold joint seminar on judicial appointments

Uzbekistan: Supreme Judicial Council and ICJ hold joint seminar on judicial appointments

Today, 8 September, the ICJ and the Supreme Judicial Council of the Republic of Uzbekistan (SJC) hold a joint International Seminar on Comparative Approaches to Selection, Appointment and Evaluation of Judges.

The seminar will address issues related to the institutions and procedures on appointment and selection of judges as well as assessment of judicial performance. International standards and national comparative examples will be discussed, including experiences of Uzbekistan, Austria, Germany, Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and Serbia. The European and Central Asian perspectives will allow the participants to identify common challenges and find ways to address them.

A Press Release about the event is available to download:

In English, in Russian, or in Uzbek.

Узбекистан: Высший судейский совет Узбекистана и МКЮ проводят совместный семинар по процедурам назначения судей

Узбекистан: Высший судейский совет Узбекистана и МКЮ проводят совместный семинар по процедурам назначения судей

Сегодня, 8 сентября, Международная комиссия юристов (МКЮ) и Высший судейский совет Республики Узбекистан (ВСС) проводят совместный Международный семинар на тему «Сравнительные подходы к отбору, назначению и оценке деятельности судей».

Семинар проходит при поддержке Европейского Союза (ЕС) в рамках проекта «Обучение и обмен в сфере международного права в целях совершенствования национальных систем правосудия в Центральной Азии». В мероприятии принимает участие Управление ООН по наркотикам и преступности.

Пресс-релиз о событии можно загрузить:

На английском, русском или узбекском языках.

Evento: Elementos de un tratado sobre las empresas y los derechos humanos

Evento: Elementos de un tratado sobre las empresas y los derechos humanos

Hoy la CIJ y el Institut de Hautes Etudes Internationales et du Développement co-organizaron una conferencia pública sobre los Elementos de un tratado sobre las empresas y los derechos humanos.

En junio de 2014, el Consejo de Derechos Humanos de las Naciones Unidas estableció un grupo de trabajo intergubernamental encargado de “elaborar un instrumento internacional jurídicamente vinculante para regular, en el derecho internacional de los derechos humanos, las actividades de las empresas transnacionales y otras empresas comerciales”.

La tercera reunión del Grupo de trabajo tendrá lugar del 23 al 27 de octubre de 2017 en el Palacio de las Naciones.

El evento tuvo lugar en un momento crítico para informar el proceso de elaboración del tratado en el Grupo de trabajo, y se orientó a fomentar el intercambio de opiniones entre los actores internacionales con el objetivo de crear las base para el consenso sobre los posibles contenidos de un instrumento jurídicamente vinculante en el ámbito de las empresas y los derechos humanos.

Se espera que el futuro tratado contribuya a subsanar algunas deficiencias en el marco normativo internacional en materia de rendición de cuentas, en relación con las operaciones de las empresas en materia de derechos humanos. El tratado también debería fortalecer la acción de los Estados para garantizar recursos efectivos y reparaciones para las víctimas de abusos.

Este tratado será el primero en el marco internacional del derecho de los derechos humanos para abordar directamente las actividades de las sociedades comerciales.

El tema de los impactos de los derechos humanos por parte de las empresas comerciales figura a la cabeza de la agenda internacional sobre el que se han desarrollado varios instrumentos no vinculantes, entre los que destacan los Principios Rectores sobre las Empresas y los Derechos Humanos.

Se prevé que el proceso hacia un tratado en este ámbito se basará en los logros alcanzados hasta la fecha, cubriendo las lagunas restantes y mejorando las normas y la acción de los Estados y las empresas por igual.

Event: Elements of a treaty on Business and Human Rights

Event: Elements of a treaty on Business and Human Rights

Today the ICJ and the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies co-organized a public conference: Elements of a treaty on Business and Human Rights.

In June 2014, the United Nations Human Rights Council established an inter-governmental working group to “elaborate an international legally binding instrument to regulate, in international human rights law, the activities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises”.

The third session of the working group will take place from 23-27 October 2017 at the Palais des Nations.

Today’s event took place at a critical moment to inform the process of elaboration by the working group.

It fosters the exchange of views among international actors, with the aim of creating the basis for consensus on possible contents of a legally binding instrument in the field of business and human rights.

The prospective treaty is expected to contribute to fill some accountability gaps in the international normative framework, in relation to the operations of business enterprises in terms of human rights.

The treaty should also enhance States’ action to ensure effective remedies and reparations for the victims of abuses.

This treaty will be the first in the international human rights law framework to address directly activities of business corporations.

The issue of human rights impacts by business enterprises has reached the top of the international agenda, and several non-treaty instruments have been developed, foremost among them the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

The process towards a treaty in this field is expected to build on the achievements so far, filling remaining gaps and enhancing rules for and action by states and businesses alike.

For additional information & registration click here

See also the photo of the week on Genève Internationale

 

Translate »