The DRC urged to hold accountable the company Anvil Mining for its involvement in the “Kilwa massacre”

The DRC urged to hold accountable the company Anvil Mining for its involvement in the “Kilwa massacre”

The ICJ has welcomed the recent decision of the African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights (ACHPR) on a recent decision found the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) responsible for the massacre of 70 people in Kilwa in 2004.

In its decision, the Commission not only urges the DRC State to pay 2.5 million US dollars compensation to eight victims and their families but also urges the DRC to prosecute Anvil Mining’s personnel involved in the massacre. 

The African Commission also acknowledged the involvement of mining company Anvil Mining, an Australian-Canadian company (later bought by the Chinese company MinMetals) operating a copper and silver mine in Dikulushi, located 50 kilometers from Kilwa, that would
have provided logistical support to soldiers who bombarded civilians.

This decision sheds light on the corporate legal responsibility for human rights abuses, particularly in the extractive
industry sector, and suggests legal avenues for action against Anvil for alleged abuses.

Universal-KilwaMassacre-News-2017-ENG (full pdf ENG)

Burundi: renew UN inquiry, initiate suspension from Human Rights Council

Burundi: renew UN inquiry, initiate suspension from Human Rights Council

The ICJ today joined other civil society organisations in calling for the UN Human Rights Council to renew the mandate of the Commission of Inquiry on Burundi and to initiate suspension of Burundi’s membership in the Council, and other measures of justice and accountability.

The call came in an open letter to all Member and Observer States of the Human Rights Council.

The letter in English:  HRC36-OpenLetter-Burundi-2017-EN

 

Burundi: renouveler le mandat de la Commission d’enquête sur le Burundi et établir la responsabilité des crimes graves commis

Burundi: renouveler le mandat de la Commission d’enquête sur le Burundi et établir la responsabilité des crimes graves commis

La CIJ s’est jointe à d’autres organisations de la société civile pour demander au Conseil des droits de l’Homme de renouveler le mandat de la Commission d’enquête sur le Burundi.

Ils demandent aussi de suspendre la participation du Burundi au Conseil et d’autres mesures de justice et de responsabilité.

Nous, les organisations de la société civile soussignées, vous écrivons pour vous demander de soutenir une résolution renouvelant le mandat de la Commission d’enquête des Nations Unies sur le Burundi (la Commission), et d’appeler le Conseil des droits de l’homme des Nations Unies (le Conseil) à explorer pendant sa 36ème session toutes les options pour assurer la responsabilité des crimes documentés par la Commission y compris, conformément à sa recommandation, l’ouverture d’une enquête par la Cour pénale internationale (CPI), dont le Bureau du Procureur a annoncé l’ouverture d’un examen préliminaire le 25 avril 2016. En outre, nous sollicitons le Conseil de demander la suspension du Burundi du Conseil ou, au minimum, de demander explicitement à l’Assemblée générale d’examiner la question conformément à l’OP8 de la résolution 60/251 de l’Assemblée générale.

Suite du plaidoyer dans le PDF ci-dessous:

HRC36-OpenLetter-Burundi-2017-FR (Lettre complète en PDF)

The ICJ concludes visit to North Mara mine in Tanzania

The ICJ concludes visit to North Mara mine in Tanzania

Today, an ICJ delegation concluded a learning and assessment mission to the North Mara region and the North Mara Gold Mine Ltd, a subsidiary of Acacia Mining plc located in north-west Tanzania in the Tarime district of the Mara region.

The visit took place between 27 August and 1 September.

The objective of the ICJ Mission was to learn about the operation with a view to assessing the effectiveness of the North Mara Gold Mine’s operational grievance mechanism (OGM) in addressing complaints over alleged human rights concerns and abuses committed in connection with the mine’s operations.

The members of the ICJ delegation were: ICJ Commissioners Justice Ian Binnie and Alejandro Salinas, accompanied by Mr Carlos Lopez, ICJ Senior Legal Adviser, and Mrs Antonella Angelini, researcher.

Read the full story here: Tanzania-BHR mission North Mara-News-Features article-2017-ENG (in PDF)

Kenya: the ICJ commends the Supreme Court’s decision to nullify the Presidential Election in fair proceedings

Kenya: the ICJ commends the Supreme Court’s decision to nullify the Presidential Election in fair proceedings

Today the Supreme Court of Kenya took the unprecedented step of voiding the presidential elections held on 8 August 2017 citing the failure by the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) to adhere to constitutionally mandated processes.

The ICJ commends the Supreme Court of Kenya for adjudication of a sensitive case at a high professional standards amidst a charged political atmosphere.

The ICJ in partnership with the Africa Judges and Jurists Forum (AJJF) sent a mission of three distinguished judges to observe the proceedings during the presidential petition in Kenya.

The delegation consisted of Retired Chief Justice Earnest Sakala (Zambia), Justice Dingake (Botswana) and Justice Chinhengo (Zimbabwe).

The mission’s observations will be publicized in due course.

Kenya held national elections on 8 August 2017 administered by the IEBC.

The IEBC subsequently announced that Uhuru Kenyatta had won the elections with a 54% majority.

The opposition National Super Alliance Coalition led by Raila Odinga filed an election petition alleging serious irregularities in the tabulation and transmission of the results of the elections and asking the court to nullify the results and order fresh elections.

The Supreme Court heard the election petitition culminating in the decision that was handed down today.

According to the observers, the court conducted the hearing in a manner consistent with the rule of law and that adhered to the Kenyan Constitution and international principles of a fair trial.

The Court gave acted fully as a competent, independent and impartial judicial body.

“The decision taken by the Supreme Court today is precedent setting. It places a cost on the election management body for apparently failing to adhere to constitutional imperatives and the normative framework governing the conduct of elections,” said Arnold Tsunga, Africa Director of the ICJ.

“Elections are a high stakes subject in Kenya, as elsewhere in the world. Previous elections have shown that violence and multiple human rights violations increase during the election period. We therefore encourage the political leaders in Kenya to accept the court’s verdict and to encourage their supporters to exercise maximum restraint and tolerance as the country braces itself for fresh elections,” he added.

Finally the ICJ urges the authorities in Kenya and the IEBC to quickly comply with and implement the court’s judgement.

Contact

Arnold Tsunga, ICJ Director for Africa, t: +27716405926 ; e: arnold.tsunga@icj.org

Translate »