Jul 23, 2015 | News
The ICJ today called on the Tunisian authorities to amend the deeply flawed draft Counter-Terrorism and Money Laundering law with a view to ensuring its full compliance with international standards.
“Tunisian authorities have obligations under international law to protect individuals under their jurisdiction against all acts of terrorism,” said Said Benarbia, Director of the Middle East and North Africa Programme at the ICJ.
“At the same time, all counter-terrorism measures must fully respect human rights guarantees and the rule of law,” he added.
The draft Counter-Terrorism and Money Laundering law, revised since it was first introduced last year, was revived following a series of attacks against members of the security forces and the army and the deadly Bardo Museum (photo) attack on 18 March 2015.
In response to the killing of 38 tourists in Sousse on 26 June and the following declaration of a state of emergency on 4 July 2015 by the Tunisian President, the Tunisian Assembly of the People’s Representatives has accelerated the process of discussing and adopting the Draft Law.
The Draft Law criminalizes a wide range of acts through overbroad and imprecise definitions of terrorism and terrorism-related acts.
Such definitions could potentially have the effect of criminalizing activities not actually related to terrorism, or even the lawful and peaceful exercise of fundamental rights and freedoms, including the right to freedom of expression, the ICJ says.
The ICJ is particularly concerned that the draft law grants, in its article 68, immunity from criminal prosecution for security forces, outside cases of self-defence, when using force in the course of their duties.
This provision requires amendment to ensure that it does not immunize use of force that violates the right to life in violation of international law and standards, including for instance intentional use of lethal force when it is not strictly unavoidable in order to protect life, the Geneva-based organization adds.
“The draft law should not dilute the specificity of terrorist acts by drawing ordinary crimes within the scope of the counterterrorism legislation, nor should it be used as a tool to shield members of security forces from accountability in cases of human rights violations committed in the course of their functions,” Benarbia said.
Furthermore, the bill contains provisions that could potentially result in undue prosecution of whistleblowers and journalists, or otherwise disproportionally limit the freedoms of expression and information in violation of international law, the ICJ notes.
A number of offences under the Draft Law are punishable with the death penalty.
The ICJ opposes the death penalty in all circumstances as a violation of the right to life and the prohibition of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment.
The Draft Law also creates an exceptional regime for police custody, allowing the prosecutor to order up to a period of 15 days of detention (articles 37 and 39) without access to a lawyer or a judge, in violation of the right to liberty, fair trial guarantees, and guarantees for the prevention of torture and other abuses in detention.
It further provides for extensive infringements of the right to privacy through various forms of surveillance, and potentially breaches lawyers’ duties of confidentiality in ways that have not been justified.
“In reviewing and approving the Draft Law, members of the Assembly must ensure that it is fully in line with Tunisia’s obligations under international law, including those relating to the right to life, to liberty and to a fair trial,” Benarbia added.
Contact
Theo Boutruche, Legal Adviser of the ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, t: +96 170 888 961 ; e: theo.boutruche@icj.org
Tunisia-Counter Terrorism Draft Law-2015-ARA (Full text in Arabic, PDF)
Jul 9, 2015
In a new position paper, the ICJ calls on the Egyptian authorities to refrain from promulgating the deeply flawed draft Counter-Terrorism Law.
The draft law, which was approved by the Cabinet on 1 July and the State Council the next day, was introduced following the assassination of the Prosecutor-General, Hisham Barakat, on 29 June, and attacks by armed groups in the Sinai two days later that left dozens of soldiers dead.
“Egypt’s draft Counter-Terrorism Law would erode the rule of law and brush aside fundamental legal and human rights guarantees,” said Said Benarbia, Director of the Middle East and North African Programme at the ICJ.
“It contravenes the unanimous declaration of all states at the UN, that human rights should be the cornerstone of counter-terrorism efforts,” he added.
The draft law criminalizes an enormous range of acts using broad definitions and vague wording. Such definitions have the potential to criminalize the legitimate and peaceful exercise of rights, including the rights to freedom of expression, association and assembly, the ICJ says.
A number of these crimes are punishable with the death penalty. The ICJ opposes the death penalty in all circumstances as a violation of the right to life and the prohibition of torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment.
Furthermore, the draft grants wide powers to investigative and law enforcement officials that present severe risks of arbitrary detention and extensive infringements of the right to privacy without adequate safeguards or judicial oversight, the ICJ adds.
The draft law also grants immunity from criminal prosecution for State officials, including potentially those who unlawfully use lethal force.
A new terrorism court with expedited procedures, which fall short of international fair trial standards, is also provided for under the draft law.
The draft also grants the President sweeping discretionary powers, including the power to take any “necessary measures” when there is a “danger of a terrorist crime.”
“Egyptian authorities must drop the draft Counter-Terrorism Law and ensure that any future counter-terrorism measures are fully in line with Egypt’s obligations under international law, including the obligation to uphold the rule of law and human rights,” Benarbia said.
Contact:
Alice Goodenough, Legal Adviser of the ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, t: +44 7815 570 834; e: alice.goodenough(a)icj.org
Nader Diab, Associate Legal Adviser of the ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, t: +41 229 793 804; e: nader.diab(a)icj.org
Egypt-Counter-Terrorism Law-Advocacy-Position papers-2015-ENG (full text of position paper in PDF, English)
Egypt-Counter-Terrorism Law-News-Press releases-2015-ARA (full text of Press release in PDF, Arabic)
Latest update (17 August):
Since publication of the ICJ’s Position Paper, certain aspects of the law have been amended, in particular by replacing the proposed “terrorism courts” with the entrenchment of terrorism circuits established within the court system. However, the main points of the criticism in the Position Paper remain valid for the version of the law promulgated on 17 August 2015.
Jun 29, 2015 | News
The ICJ calls on the UN Human Rights Council and the Security Council to respond to the findings of the Independent Commission of Inquiry on the 2014 Gaza Conflict, and fully implement all its recommendations.
This should be done with a view to ensuring accountability, including effective remedy and reparation, for all violations of international humanitarian law and human rights abuses committed by the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF) and by Palestinian armed groups, the ICJ says.
The ICJ further calls on the Human Rights Council to establish an independent mechanism to monitor the implementation of the Commission’s recommendations by both parties.
“Israeli and Palestinian authorities must break the chronic cycle of impunity in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. All credible evidence of war crimes, such as the Commission of Inquiry has highlighted, must be properly investigated,” said Said Benarbia, Director of the ICJ MENA Programme.
“No one who is responsible, whether military or civilian and regardless how high their office, can be allowed to escape justice,” he added.
The Report published last week, and discussed today at the Human Rights Council, documents serious violations of international law and human rights abuses committed during the conflict, such as indiscriminate attacks, including disproportionate attacks, and direct attacks against civilians and against civilian objects that are not justified under the International Humanitarian Law.
The Commission found that artillery and other explosive weapons had been used in densely populated areas, that entire neighborhoods in Gaza had been destroyed, and that unguided rockets had been used.
As indicated by the Commission, some of those acts may constitute war crimes.
To date, both Israeli and Palestinian authorities have failed to meet their obligations under international law to effectively investigate the violations and to prosecute anyone criminally responsible.
Investigations and criminal proceedings initiated by the IDF’s Military Advocate General (MAG), which is also involved in the planning and execution of the IDF’s military operations, fall short of international standards including in relation to independence and impartiality.
No criminal investigations into violations and abuses committed by Palestinian armed groups appear to have been initiated by the Gaza authorities.
The ICJ calls on both authorities to provide for effective, independent and impartial investigation mechanisms in line with international standards.
Absent such reforms, international justice mechanisms can and should fill accountability and remediation gaps where domestic authorities are unwilling or unable to effectively administer justice.
“Israeli and Palestinian authorities must reform the framework for their current investigations and prosecutions. They must also fully cooperate with international accountability mechanisms, including the preliminary examination initiated by the International Criminal Court,” Benarbia said. “The aim throughout must be to make known the truth about the violations, to identify and hold those responsible to account, to ensure victims’ rights, and to prevent any recurrence.”
Contact:
Theo Boutruche, Legal Adviser of the ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, tel: +33 670735747, e-mail: theo.boutruche(a)icj.org
POT-UN Report Gaza -News-Press release-2015-ARA
Jun 21, 2015 | News
Today, one year on from the arrest and detention of human rights lawyer Yara Sallam and 22 peaceful demonstrators, the ICJ calls for their immediate and unconditional release.
On 21 June 2014, Yara Sallam, together with 22 others, was arrested and detained in the context of a peaceful demonstration in Heliopolis, Cairo.
“The Egyptian authorities must end their campaign to silence human rights defenders and all those suspected of opposing the military and the government through politically motivated prosecutions and trials,” said Said Benarbia, Director of the ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme.
To this end, they must immediately and unconditionally release Yara Sallam and the 22 other detainees,” he added.
The demonstrators were calling for the revocation of Law No. 107 of 2013, on public meetings, processions and protests, and the release of all those detained under it.
They were forcibly dispersed by security forces and men in civilian clothes.
The ICJ has previously noted that this law is contrary to Egypt’s obligations under international law.
It imposes overly restrictive limitations on the exercise of the right to freedom of assembly and it grants sweeping powers to security forces to disperse non-violent protests, including authorizing the use of lethal force when it is not strictly necessary to protect lives, the Geneva-based organization says.
On 26 October 2014, the 23 accused were convicted by the Heliopolis Misdemeanour court and sentenced to three years in prison and three years of police monitoring on charges of, among other things, “participating in a procession of more than five people that put public safety in danger with the aim of committing the crimes of assault on people and property and influencing public authorities in their duties by using force and violence.”
Two months later, the Court of Appeal upheld the convictions, while reducing the sentence to two years imprisonment and two years of police monitoring. A challenge before the Court of Cassation is pending.
The trial of the 23 defendants violated their rights to a fair and public hearing under international law, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, a key human rights treaty ratified by Egypt in 1982.
Their lawyers were prevented from cross-examining witnesses. Members of the public, including family members, were prohibited from entering the courtroom, without any valid reason.
Further, based on its review of the case file and court judgments, the ICJ is also concerned that both courts convicted the accused in the absence of any substantial or credible evidence of the guilt of any of the 23 defendants, and without seeking to establish the personal criminal responsibility of each individual accused.
Contact:
Alice Goodenough, Legal Adviser of the ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, t: +44 7815 570 834 ; e: alice.goodenough(a)icj.org
Nader Diab, Associate Legal Adviser of the ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, t: +41 78 89 41 877 ; e: nader.diab(a)icj.org
Egypt-Release Yara-News-Press release-2015-Arabic (full text in PDF, Arabic)
Jun 19, 2015 | News
The ICJ today called on the Moroccan authorities to amend the draft laws on the High Judicial Council, the Conseil supérieur du pouvoir judiciaire (CSPJ), and on the Statute for Judges, to ensure their full compliance with international law and standards on judicial independence.
The ICJ called on the authorities to ensure that: the CSPJ is institutionally and organizationally independent; is exclusively competent to manage the career of judges, including the selection of trainee judges; is involved in determining the budget for the judiciary; and is empowered to administer the allocation of judicial resources.
This statement comes following the conclusion of a high-level mission to Morocco from 12 to 18 June 2015 to engage with members of the executive, legislative and judicial branches, as well as representatives of civil society, on the judicial reforms initiated by the Moroccan authorities.
“The Draft Law on the CSPJ should enhance and expand the guarantees of judicial independence provided for by the 2011 Constitution, including by ensuring that the General Inspection Service (GIS) is under the authority of the CSPJ, that the organic law on the CSPJ sets out the GIS composition, competencies, and areas of intervention, and that the CSPJ oversees all issues pertaining to judicial administration,” said Philippe Texier, ICJ Commissioner and a former judge of the French Cassation Court (photo).
During this mission, the ICJ submitted to the authorities two memos analyzing the draft laws in light of international law and standards and formulating recommendations for amendments and reform.
In particular, the ICJ called for the majority of the members of the CSPJ to be judges who are chosen by their peers, for the selection and appointment of the President and the General Prosecutor of the Cassation Court to be based on objective criteria and made through transparent procedures, and for the grounds and procedure for dismissal of members of the CSPJ to be prescribed by the Law.
The ICJ is also deeply concerned that the draft law on the Statute for Judges does not contain any provisions on the criteria and procedure for selecting trainee judges.
Under the current framework, the process of selecting trainee judges is under the effective control of the Ministry of Justice.
Furthermore, while the Draft Laws entrusts the CSPJ to draft a Code of Judicial Conduct, they do not specify that, once adopted, the Code should be the basis on which judges will be held to account professionally, the Geneva-based organization says.
“The Draft Law should be amended to set out fair and transparent procedures for selecting trainee judges, to ensure that the CSPJ is fully competent to oversee the entire selection process, and to provide for the code of ethics and judicial conduct to be established in the law as the basis on which judges will be held to account professionally, including by clearly and precisely defining disciplinary offences,” said Said Benarbia, ICJ Director of the Middle East and North Africa Programme.
Contact:
Theo Boutruche, Legal Adviser of the ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, t: +96 170 888 961, e: theo.boutruche(a)icj.org
Additional information:
The ICJ delegation was led by Mr. Philippe Texier, former judge of the French Cassation Court and ICJ Commissioner.
The delegation met with Mr. Driss Dahak, Secretary General of the Government; Mr. Abdelilah Lahkim Bennani, Secretary General of the Ministry of Justice; Mr. Mustapha Farès, First President of the Cassation Court; Mr. Mohamed Meddah, Prosecutor General of the Cassation Court; Mr. Mohamed Cheikh Biadillah, President of the Chamber of Counsellors; Mr. Omar Adkhil, President of the Commission of Justice, Legislation and Human Rights of the Chamber of Counsellors; Mr. Mohamed Zerdali, President of the Commission of Justice, Legislation and Human Rights of the Chamber of Deputies; Mr. Abdellatif Chentof, President of the Judges Club; Mr. Mohamed Khadraoui, vice-President of the Amicale Hassania; and Mr. Mohamed Akdim, President of the Bar Associations of Morocco (ABAM).
Morocco-Draft Law CSPJ-News-press releases-2015-ARA (full text of statement, in PDF, Arabic)
Morocco-Memo on the CSPJ-Advocacy-Briefing paper-2015-ENG (full text of memo 1 in PDF)
Morocco-Memo on the CSPJ-Advocacy-Briefing paper-2015-ARA (full text of memo 1 in PDF, Arabic)
Morocco-Memo on Statute for Judges-Advocacy-Briefing paper-2015-ENG (full text of memo 2 in PDF)
Morocco-Memo on Statute for Judges-Advocacy-Briefing paper-2015-ARA (full text of memo 2 in PDF, Arabic)
