In its concluding observations on Belgium, the Human Rights Committee expressed its concern at that country’s anti-terrorist legislation. The Committee said that Belgian laws give a definition of terrorism which, in referring to the degree of severity of offences and the perpetrators’ intended purpose, does not entirely satisfy the principle that offences and penalties must be clearly set out in law. The Committee urged Belgium to produce a more precise definition of terrorist offences.
Concluding ObservationsRecent News
South Africa: Constitutional Court’s affirmation that principles of judicial independence are fully applicable to military courts is a welcome step forward
09 May 2025EU: Lawyers and civil society call for mandatory humanitarian clause in anti-smuggling directive
09 May 2025EU: Access to a lawyer in juvenile justice proceedings remains a key concern in several EU Member States
07 May 2025- Tunisia: Arbitrarily detained lawyer Ahmed Souab must be released and criminal charges dropped06 May 2025