On 28 November, a district court ruled that parts of the Executive Order authorizing the freezing of assets of suspected terrorists and terrorist organizations, were vague and therefore unconstitutional. The Order, issued by the President in the immediate aftermath of the 9/11 attacks, gave the President broad authority to designate organizations and individuals as terrorist without any criteria and authorized the Secretary of Treasury to designate those “otherwise associated” with a designated terrorist group. The case was brought on behalf of the Humanitarian Law Project, an NGO seeking to provide human rights advocacy training to the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) in Turkey and several other organizations seeking to support humanitarian activities of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in Sri Lanka.
Press ArticleRecent News
South Africa: Constitutional Court’s affirmation that principles of judicial independence are fully applicable to military courts is a welcome step forward
09 May 2025EU: Lawyers and civil society call for mandatory humanitarian clause in anti-smuggling directive
09 May 2025EU: Access to a lawyer in juvenile justice proceedings remains a key concern in several EU Member States
07 May 2025- Tunisia: Arbitrarily detained lawyer Ahmed Souab must be released and criminal charges dropped06 May 2025