In this decision the UN Human Rights Committee found a violation of article 9.1 ICCPR on the basis that the State, in light of the author’s particular circumstances, did not consider less invasive means than detention to achieve compliance with the State Party’s immigration policies.
Recent News
South Africa: Constitutional Court’s affirmation that principles of judicial independence are fully applicable to military courts is a welcome step forward
09 May 2025EU: Lawyers and civil society call for mandatory humanitarian clause in anti-smuggling directive
09 May 2025EU: Access to a lawyer in juvenile justice proceedings remains a key concern in several EU Member States
07 May 2025- Tunisia: Arbitrarily detained lawyer Ahmed Souab must be released and criminal charges dropped06 May 2025