Казахстан: Экспертное заключение МКЮ по вопросу об использовании решений Комитета ООН против пыток в рамках производства в национальных судах

Казахстан: Экспертное заключение МКЮ по вопросу об использовании решений Комитета ООН против пыток в рамках производства в национальных судах

МКЮ предоставила экспертное заключение по процессу Олега Евлоева в Казахстане. В рамках производства по делу рассматриваются вопросы, ставшие предметом решения Комитета ООН против пыток («КПП ООН»).

МКЮ изложилa обязательства государств в соответствии с Конвенцией ООН против пыток, Процедурой согласно статье 22 Конвенции, а также роль национальных судов в отношении решений КПП.

Контакты:

Роушин Пиллей, директор Региональной программы МКЮ по Европе, roisin.pillay(a)icj.org

Тимур Шакиров, правовой советник Региональной программы МКЮ по Европе, temur.shakirov(a)icj.org

Russia-Evloev expert opinion-Advocacy-analysis brief-2015-rus (полный текст PDF)

Federal Court judgment on Anwar Ibrahim’s ‘sodomy II’ appeal a blow to human rights in Malaysia

Federal Court judgment on Anwar Ibrahim’s ‘sodomy II’ appeal a blow to human rights in Malaysia

The ICJ today expressed deep concern over the ruling of the Federal Court upholding the conviction on “sodomy charges” of opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim by the Court of Appeal under the colonial-era Section 377B of the Penal Code.

The decision today was on the final appeal against the March 2014 decision of the Court of Appeal, which overturned the 2012 High Court’s decision to acquit Anwar Ibrahim (photo) of “sodomy charges”.

The ICJ has called on Malaysia to repeal Section 377B, which criminalizes consensual same-sex relations.

The Federal Court also upheld the Court of Appeal’s decision to sentence Anwar to five years’ imprisonment.

“It is clear from the decision of the Federal Court today that the Government of Malaysia has once again inappropriately used Section 377B of the Penal Code against its political opponents,” said Justice Elizabeth Evatt, Commissioner of the ICJ who was in Putrajaya to observe the proceedings.

“This is deplorable, especially since Section 377B criminalizes consensual same-sex relations and thereby violates a range of international law and standards, including on the rights to privacy, non-discrimination and equal protection,” she added.

This relic of British law has long since been abandoned in the United Kingdom, but is still in force in Malaysia.

However, in the last few years, it has only been used against opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim.

The conviction today amounts to the second sodomy conviction for Anwar Ibrahim within the past 14 years.

His first conviction in August 2000 resulted in an imprisonment term of nine years. That decision was overturned by the Federal Court in September 2004.

The ICJ recalls that such “sodomy” charges cannot be considered recognizable criminal offences under international human rights law and standards.

“The criminalization of consensual same-sex conduct is in contravention of a number of human rights, including the right to dignity; equality before the law and equal protection of the law; non-discrimination; liberty and security of person; privacy; opinion and expression; association and peaceful assembly,” said Emerlynne Gil, ICJ’s International Legal Adviser for Southeast Asia, who also observed the hearings.

“Anwar Ibrahim should never have been investigated, charged with, tried, let alone convicted of and sentenced for such charges. The confirmation of his conviction and sentencing on these charges are an affront to human rights and the rule law,” she added.

The ICJ also noted with concern that the right to a fair trial of Anwar Ibrahim was violated in a number of respects, particularly his right to be presumed innocent.

Under international law, a person charged with committing a crime is considered innocent until proven guilty. Hence, this imposes upon the prosecution the burden to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

“In this case, however, it appeared that the Court of Appeal adopted an approach wherein the burden was on Anwar Ibrahim to prove that he had a credible defense, rather than raising reasonable doubt as to the prosecution’s case,” Justice Evatt said.

The ICJ says that by dismissing the final appeal of Anwar Ibrahim, the Federal Court has in effect adopted the same approach of the Court of Appeal to these issues.

This decision is a clear setback for the rule of law in Malaysia and is incompatible with the presumption of innocence principle, the Geneva-based organization adds.

Anwar Ibrahim has now exhausted all avenues of appeal and has immediately begun serving his sentence.

The ICJ observed the hearings in this case before the Court of Appeal in September 2013, February 2014, and March 2014, and before the Federal Court from 28 to 30 October 2014.

Elisabeth Evatt, a former judge of the Australian Federal Court and Commissioner of the ICJ, acted as the trial observer on behalf of the ICJ at the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court.

Contact:

Emerlynne Gil, International Legal Adviser, tel. +662 6198477 ext. 206 or email: emerlynne.gil(a)icj.org

 

Российская Федерация: МКЮ призывает защитить безопасность адвокатов, после нападения на Мурада Магомедова

Российская Федерация: МКЮ призывает защитить безопасность адвокатов, после нападения на Мурада Магомедова

МКЮ обеспокоена вчерашним нападением на адвоката Мурада Магомедова в Махачкале, возле здания Верховного суда Дагестана. МКЮ призывает власти принять эффективные меры для обеспечения безопасности адвоката Магомедова.

Нападение произошло во время перерыва в слушании Верховного суда, в котором Мурад Магомедов защищал своего клиента, Ахмеда Исрапилова, по обвинению в терроризме.

Адвокат был жестоко избит группой из пяти человек и получил серьезные травмы головы.

Его отвезли в Республиканскую центральную клиническую больницу, где он остался, выздоравливая от сотрясения мозга, множественных травм и переломов челюсти.

«Это еще один шаг в серии физических нападений на адвокатов в Дагестане и свидетельствует о насущной необходимости того, чтобы власти предприняли эффективные меры для защиты адвокатов в регионе», – сказал Темур Шакиров, юрисконсульт МКЮ. «Как местные, так и федеральные органы власти в Российской Федерации должны обеспечить быстрое расследование, ведущее к тем, которые несут ответственность за этот насильственный акт, привлеченным к ответственности».

В Основных принципах ООН роли юриста предусматривается, что «когда безопасность адвокатов угрожает в результате выполнения их функций, они должны быть надлежащим образом защищены властями».

В соответствии с международным правом в области прав человека государство должно принять меры по защите безопасности лиц, которые власти знают или должны знать, находятся под угрозой и должны обеспечить независимое, быстрое и тщательное расследование любых нападений на жизнь или физическую неприкосновенность лиц.

Мурад Магомедов работает адвокатом с Правозащитным центром «Мемориал» с осени 2014 года и представляет людей, пострадавших от «спецоперации» в селе Временный Дагестана в сентябре 2014 года. В этом случае Магомедов не выступает в качестве представителя Мемориала.

МКЮ ранее указала на случаи нападения и убийства адвокатов в Дагестане.

Контакты:

Роушин Пиллей, директор Региональной программы МКЮ по Европе, roisin.pillay(a)icj.org

Тимур Шакиров, правовой советник Региональной программы МКЮ по Европе, temur.shakirov(a)icj.org

Myanmar must follow through on promising efforts to improve the independence and accountability of its legal system

Myanmar must follow through on promising efforts to improve the independence and accountability of its legal system

Myanmar must follow through on promising efforts to improve the independence and accountability of its legal system, and particularly its judiciary, said the ICJ today at the launch of one of its landmark book in Yangon.

The ICJ launched today the Myanmar language version of its Practitioners’ Guide to the Independence and Accountability of Judges, Lawyers and Prosecutors.

“The judiciary in Myanmar has taken important steps towards asserting its independence from the other branches of government, but we heard repeatedly from the judiciary that they still face significant obstacles in this regard,” said Wilder Tayler, ICJ’s Secretary-General.

The book launch wrapped a series of discussions regarding judicial ethics and the rule of law with the Supreme Court of the Union of Myanmar, as well as with the parliamentary Committee on Rule of Law and Tranquility.

The ICJ’s Practitioners’ Guide n°1 is the first of its kind to be published in the Myanmar language providing detailed references to international and comparative standards on the independence and accountability of judges and lawyers.

“The Supreme Court emphasized its belief that an independent judiciary plays a key role in ensuring access to justice and the protection of human rights, but with independence must come accountability,” Tayler added. “The Myanmar judiciary must be accountable not just in deciding cases according to the law and facts, but also as a separate and equal branch of the government, and ultimately, to the people of Myanmar.”

In the course of its discussions at an earlier workshop in Naypyidaw, the ICJ was repeatedly told that the judiciary is trying to address challenges to its institutional independence, as well as the independence of individual judges.

Corruption, which remains a serious problem throughout all social sectors, including the judiciary, interferes with the judiciary’s ability to provide a remedy for human rights violations and bringing perpetrators to justice.

Undue influence by powerful political and economic actors continues to hamper the push for greater trust and credibility for the judiciary among the general public.

“As we heard at the workshop, at all levels of the system, from the Supreme Court to the Townships, a lack of resources, poor working conditions and low remunerations contribute to an environment where the temptations of corruption, or outside pressure, undermine judicial independence and impartiality,” said Tayler.

“We also heard strong support from all levels of the judiciary for establishing a judicial code of conduct that incorporates international standards and best practices in response to the demands of the people of Myanmar for more rule of law. Producing such a code, and implementing it, would go a long way toward increasing the judiciary’s independence and accountability,” he added.

Wilder Tayler was joined by a senior panel of international legal experts on judicial integrity, including three ICJ Commissioners: Justice Azhar Cachalia of the Supreme Court of Appeals of South Africa, Justice Radmila Dicic of  the Supreme Court of Serbia, and retired Justice Ketil Lund of the Supreme Court of Norway.

Translate »