Human Rights Council: ICJ oral intervention on the situation in Syria

Human Rights Council: ICJ oral intervention on the situation in Syria

During the 19th session of the Human Rights Council, a Special Debate was held on the situation of human rights in the Syrian Arab Republic.

In an oral statement during that Debate, the ICJ expressed deep concern on the continuing deterioration of the situation in Syria.

It emphasised that the Security Council should take meaningful steps to break the cycle of impunity, including by referring the situation to the International Criminal Court, and that the General Assembly should take steps towards the suspension of Syria’s rights in the Assembly until its authorities comply with the Commission of Inquiry recommendations and put a stop to the gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, and hold those responsible to account.

Syria-oral intervention-advocacy-2012 (full text in English)

Human Rights Council: ICJ written statement on Nepal

Human Rights Council: ICJ written statement on Nepal

The ICJ made a written statement on Nepal to the Human Rights Council during its 19th session in Geneva. 

More than five years since the end of the armed conflict in Nepal, international monitoring mechanisms established to scrutinise progress in the peace process in the country have effectively ceased to function, despite the failure to conclude the peace process and establish the agreed-upon transitional justice mechanisms.

The ICJ statement focuses on amnesty provisions in transitional justice legislation; proposed pardons, and the appointment of alleged rights violator to Government; and lack of investigations and withdrawal of cases.

Nepal-Written statement ICJ-non-judicial submission-2012 (full text in English, PDF)

Human Rights Council: ICJ written statement related to South Asia

Human Rights Council: ICJ written statement related to South Asia

The ICJ made a written statement on national commissions of inquiry in South Asia at the Human Rights Council’s 19th session.Although national commissions of inquiry can contribute towards States’ fulfilment of their international human rights obligations when established in line with international standards and best practices, they are all too often found wanting and frequently designed to continue a culture of impunity for serious human rights violations and to weaken the rule of law.

In a written statement to the Human Rights Council during its 19th session in Geneva, the ICJ raised the issue of the relationship between national commissions of inquiry in South Asia with the criminal justice system, and the question of political will and adherence to international standards.

Written statement ICJ-non-judicial submission-2012 (full text in English, PDF)

The ICJ welcomes historic decision in Atala v. Chile

The ICJ welcomes historic decision in Atala v. Chile

The ICJ is pleased with the decision of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights that parental sexual orientation is not a factor in child custody cases.

On 20 March the Inter-American Court of Human Rights ruled that parental sexual orientation is not a factor in child custody cases and that Chile had violated Karen Atala’s rights to equality, non-discrimination and privacy when the Supreme Court of Chile removed custody of her three daughters from her because she had begun a relationship with another woman.

In its first sexual orientation case, the Court held that sexual orientation is a protected ground, included under “other social condition” in Article 1 of the American Convention on Human Rights.

The Court further stated that the best interests of the child test could not be used as a pretext for prohibited discrimination in custody cases.

The Court also found that the Supreme Court of Chile’s reliance on stereotypes and prejudices was a violation of the State’s obligation to protect rights. Finally, the Court stated that the American Convention did not protect a specific form of traditional family and that states must recognize diverse family structures.

The International Commission of Jurists was called by the Inter-American Commission as an expert and submitted written and oral testimony on the role of parental sexual orientation as a factor in child custody cases.
Decision:

(http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_239_esp.pdf)

Expert Submission:

(https://www.icj.org/dwn/database/Jernow%20Written%20Submission.pdf)

Translate »