Jun 8, 2017 | Events, News
Today, the ICJ and FIDH are organizing a side event to to the 35th Regular session of the Human Rights Council on business and human rights.
Business responsibility to respect human rights
Challenges and opportunities six years after the adoption of UNGPs
A dialogue to move forward
Thursday 8 June 2017, 15.30-17.00
Meeting Room VIII
Palais des Nations, Geneva
After the adoption of the UNGP in 2011, standards on business responsibility to respect human rights and business human rights due diligence have gained prominence in the global debate on business accountability.
Many companies claim to comply with the UNGP by performing a human rights due diligence including across their global supply chain.
Several initiatives have emerged at regional and national level to promote companies’ due diligence processes, including the EU Directive on non-financial reporting, the UK Modern Slavery Act, the French law on company devoir de vigilance.
Despite the progress, serious human rights abuses still occur in both developing and developed countries.
The ability of companies to identify, monitor and prevent negative human rights impacts in their operations and relationships is still weak and the access to effective remedy remains difficult if not impossible.
This is an opportune moment to take stock of the progresses made to date and the challenges ahead in order to create a level playing field that will effectively promote the respect of human rights in business global operations.
Welcome speech
Saman Zia-Zarifi, ICJ Secretary General
Moderator
Carlos Lopez, ICJ
Panelists
Fernanda Hopenhaym, PODER/ESCR-net CAWG steering group
Maddalena Neglia, FIDH
Michael Addo, UN Working Group on BHR
Olivier De Schutter, UN Committee on ESCR/University of Louvain
Jun 7, 2017 | Events, News
The ICJ organised a panel discussion on 8 June 2017, on the role of judges and lawyers in relation to refugees and migrants, at a side event to the 35th session of the UN Human Rights Council in Geneva.
The Panel was held on the occasion of the publication of ICJ Principles and Commentary on the topic, developed in consultation with judges, lawyers and other expert practitioners from around the world.
The event took place on Thursday, 8 June 2017, from 10:30 to 11:30, in Room XXI of the Palais des Nations, Geneva.
Welcome remarks were delivered by:
- Saman Zia-Zarifi, Secretary General of the ICJ.
- Olivier Coutau, Délégué à la Genève internationale, Republic and Canton of Geneva
Panelists included:
- François Crépeau, UN Special Rapporteur on the human rights of migrants.
- Carole Simone Dahan, Senior Legal Advisor on Judicial Engagement, UNHCR.
- Pia Oberoi, Advisor on Migration and Human Rights, OHCHR.
The discussion was moderated by Matt Pollard, ICJ Senior Legal Adviser.
At the event, each of the panelists emphasised the importance of access to independence courts and lawyers for securing the rights of refugees and migrants, and highlighted the importance and utlity of the ICJ Principles in this regard.
More background on the ICJ Principles and Commentary is available by clicking here.
For more information, email un(a)icj.org
A flyer for the event may be downloaded in PDF format here: Refugees-Migrants-ICJ-Event-HRC35-June2017
The consultations, development and publication of the ICJ Principles were made possible with the financial support of the Republic and Canton of Geneva, for which the ICJ is grateful.
Jun 5, 2017 | News
La CIJ espresa su más honda preocupación por los desalojos forzosos de las comunidasdes de Laguna Larga y la Mestiza, del Departamento de El Petén.
El pasado viernes 2 de junio, el Gobierno de Guatemala llevó a cabo un operativo militar en el Departamento de El Petén de desalojo forzoso de la comunidad Laguna Larga, situada en Laguna del Tigre en el municipio de San Andres, y tiene programado llevar a cabo otro de la comunidad La Mestiza, del mismo municipio, para el 14 de junio.
Como consecuencia de este operativo militar, la comunidad de Laguna Larga – alrededor de 600 o 700 personas, incluidos niños, mujeres y ancianos- decidió desplazarse en condiciones deplorables hacia territorio mexicano, en búsqueda de refugio y protección.
El sábado 3 de junio los miembros de la comunidad de Laguna Larga cruzaron la frontera y se encuentran actualmente en el municipio de La Candelaria, Campeche, México, en condiciones sumamente adversas. Varios niños y niñas muestran signos de enfermedades respiratorias.
Preocupa particularmente a la CIJ la situación física y mental de un niño que fuera perseguido por las fuerzas militares, durante el operativo de desalojo.
En repetidas ocasiones, la CIJ ha expresado que las comunidades que viven en los municipios de San Andrés y La Libertad en el departamento de El Petén, siguen enfrentando la exclusión sistemática por parte de las instituciones del Estado, así como violaciones graves a los derechos humanos, en particular violaciones a los derechos económicos, sociales y culturales.
Por el hecho de vivir en una zona protegida de conformidad con la Ley de Áreas Protegidas, el Estado guatemalteco considera a estas poblaciones como “ilegales” y las acusa de cometer el delito de “usurpación” de áreas protegidas, prohibiendo el ingreso de materiales de construcción, herramientas o cualquier bien que pueda garantizar o significar la más mínima “permanencia” en dichas comunidades o en la zona.
Recientemente fue detenido arbitrariamente el señor Jovel Tovar, acusado del delito de usurpación de áreas protegidas, quien se encuentra detenido en la cárcel de San Benito, en el Departamento de El Petén.
Paradójicamente, el Estado guatemalteco permite y facilita la explotación petrolera en dicha zona, de la compañía PERENCO, a pesar de que los derrames petroleros y otras actividades relacionadas con esa actividad, producen un serio deterioro a las reservas de agua dulce, las cuales son las más importantes de Mesoamérica.
La CIJ considera que esta política afecta seriamente los derechos de la población asentada en la zona.
En repetidas ocasiones, la CIJ ha podido observar que el Ejército de Guatemala, conjuntamente con la Comisión Nacional de Áreas Protegidas (CONAP), implementa operativos por medio de los cuales se lleva a cabo un acoso permanente a las comunidades que viven en las zonas protegidas.
La presencia del Ejército de Guatemala en la zona y la existencia de diferentes “retenes” militares son parte de la estrategia de acoso permanente a las poblaciones asentadas en la región, las cuales llegaron allí en el marco de un programa estatal en los años setenta, antes de la declaración de zona protegida.
Según la Constitución Política de la República de Guatemala, el Estado se organiza para proteger a la persona y no para perseguirla.
El acoso permanente a las comunidades, así como las políticas de Estado contra las personas que viven en las zonas protegidas, estableciendo “cercos de presión psicológica, material y militar”, constituye una política de Estado que contradice la Constitución Política de Guatemala, así como convenios y tratados en materia de derechos humanos – especialmente el Pacto Internacional de Derechos Económicos, Sociales y Culturales (PIDESC) de las Naciones Unidas-, que imponen la obligación al Estado de garantizar los derechos económicos, sociales y culturales y que toda persona disfrute del más alto nivel posible de salud física y mental.
Ramón Cadena, Director de la CIJ para Centro América expresó: “Esta política del Estado de Guatemala de desalojar a las comunidades de cualquier región del país en forma violenta, contraviene el Derecho Internacional de los Derechos Humanos y los estándares internacionales y el Estado de Guatemala debe ser declarado responsable y reparar los daños y perjuicios causados.”
Para mayor información:
Ramón Cadena, director CIJ C.A. al correo ramon.cadena(a)icj.org o a los telefonos +502 23601919; +502 23610538.
Leer más aqui:
Guatemala-Desalojo Peten-News-2017-SPA (en PDF)
May 31, 2017 | News
The ICJ today called on the Egyptian authorities to act immediately to repeal the law on civic associations.
The law was adopted by Egypt’s Parliament on 15 November 2016 and signed into law by President El-Sisi on 29 May 2017.
Until the law is repealed, the authorities should desist from enforcing it, the ICJ says.
The law effectively prohibits most Egyptian human rights non-governmental organizations (NGOs) from registering and working in Egypt, stipulating that civic associations’ work shall take place in the fields of development and social welfare consistent with “the State’s plans and its developmental needs and priorities.”
Egyptian and international NGOs are also forbidden to advocate against any law or its implementation, as well as to carry out “political activities” or any that “harm national security, public order, public morals or public health.”
They are prohibited from conducting public surveys, research or reports without permission and approval of the results of such work must be given by the authorities prior to publication (articles 14, 87).
The law also provides for an entity to be formed by presidential decree from representatives of three security bodies, which will decide on all matters related to NGO funding, the registration and issues relating to the work of international NGOs, and cooperation between Egyptian associations and any foreign body.
“The law on civic associations, if implemented in its present form, would be tantamount to an official death certificate of independent civil society in Egypt,” said Said Benarbia, ICJ Middle East and North Africa Director.
“By signing it into law, President El-Sisi is silencing the very organizations that could act as a check on the abusive and arbitrary exercise of his power,” he added.
The adoption of this repressive law is just the latest measure in a sustained, relentless campaign by Egypt’s military and executive authorities aimed at dismantling Egyptian civil society through highly politicized judicial proceedings and arbitrary travel bans against NGOs and human rights defenders.
For instance, the foreign funding case taken against NGOs (no. 173/2011) saw leading Egyptian human rights organizations, such as the Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies (CIHRS), the Arabic Network for Human Rights Information (ANHRI) and the Hicham Mubrak Law Center (HMLC), subject to arbitrary investigations.
The grounds included “receiving funds to harm national interests and destroy the basic foundations of the state (the army, police, and judiciary),” “establishing an entity operating as a civic association without official registration,” and “income tax evasion.”
Four of these organizations and six NGO directors/board members have been subjected to asset freezes.
In the last two months, many NGO staff and directors have been summoned for interrogation by investigative judges, including ICJ partners Mustapha El-Hassan, Director of HMLC, Gamel Eid, Founder and Director of ANHRI, and Mohamed Zaree, CIHRS’ Programme Director and short-listed candidate for the Martin Ennals Award 2017.
The ICJ has previously documented how the Egyptian authorities have used the justice system as a repressive tool in their efforts to silence many of those suspected of opposing them.
“Egyptian authorities must comply with their obligations under international law and put an immediate end to their campaign to silence human rights defenders and NGOs. A first step in that direction would be the immediate repeal of the law on civic associations,” Benarbia said.
Contact
Said Benarbia, Director of the ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, t: +41 22 979 38 17: said.benarbia(a)icj.org
Egypt-NGO Law-News-Press release-ARA (Press release in Arabic, PDF)
May 30, 2017 | News
Representatives of large European business enterprises met today with State delegates and representatives of FIDH and the ICJ in Geneva to discuss their views on a prospective international treaty on business and human rights.
The meeting was organized by the FIDH and ICJ and took place under Chatham House rules.
The United Nations Human Rights Council started in 2014 an intergovernmental process towards an international treaty concerning business and the protection human rights.
The first draft elements of that treaty should be discussed in October 2017, after two years of preparatory consultations among the concerned stakeholders.
The meeting in Geneva took place in the context of growing involvement by key business leaders in international discussions, in dialogue with civil society and governments, around global human rights standards.
Business representatives present in the meeting expressed their views regarding the content of a future international treaty founded on their need to have level playing field regarding human rights responsibilities to operate in global markets.
They pointed out that the new treaty should apply to all businesses, go beyond the existing frameworks and create a framework for a fair human rights based competition among businesses towards higher standards.
State delegates and NGOs representatives also shared their perspectives noting that the current circumstances call for bolder collective action as a matter of urgency.
Most participants underlined the key role that State agencies should play in enforcing the rules at the local level and in protecting their people.
Finally, a call was made for businesses, civil society and governments to take their responsibility to promote global human rights binding rules for business operations, including in the global marketplace.
May 30, 2017 | News, Op-eds
An opinion piece by Sean Bain, ICJ legal consultant in Myanmar, and Vicky Bowman, Director of the Myanmar Centre for Responsible Business.
A strategic environmental assessment is needed to enable sustainable development and the fulfilment of human rights for the people of Kyaukphyu, the site of a planned SEZ and deep-sea port.
In its interim report released in March, the Advisory Commission on Rakhine State chaired by former United Nations secretary-general Kofi Annan, called for a comprehensive assessment of the special economic zone in Kyaukphyu Township.
The aim would be to “explore how the SEZ may affect local communities and map how other economic sectors in the state may benefit (or possibly suffer) from the SEZ”.
The State Counsellor’s Office endorsed the commission’s interim recommendations, including for this assessment.
The call for a comprehensive assessment in Kyaukphyu echoes a proposal from our organisations, the Myanmar Centre for Responsible Business and the International Commission of Jurists, for the government to undertake a strategic environmental assessment.
Its purpose would be to address concerns about human rights and to consider the cumulative environmental and social impacts of planned developments. Oxfam has put forward a similar recommendation to the government.
Our recommendation comes as media reports this month suggest that the government is giving renewed attention to the future of the SEZ and related projects in Kyaukphyu.
The SEZ, which has been planned to include industrial parks along with deep-sea ports and transport links to China, would transform the demographic and economic character of Rakhine State’s central coast and hinterlands.
It would have significant impacts for local communities and the state economy, both during and beyond the envisaged 20-year construction period.
Kyaukphyu – already the starting point for oil and gas pipelines to China – would host the largest development project ever undertaken in Rakhine State.
Financed mostly by Chinese investors, with shipping facilities linking Myanmar to international routes through the Bay of Bengal, the project also has national and regional economic significance.
However, to date there has been insufficient consideration of the impacts, either positive or negative, on the livelihoods and human rights of residents and the economy of Rakhine State.
Plans for the SEZ are ambitious yet detailed information is scarce and so far there has been no genuine public participation in planning processes.
While contracts and payments regarding investments are decided in Myanmar’s economic and political capitals, it is at the local level that negative impacts can be felt the most.
It is also at the local level where economic benefits may be enhanced.
To address negative impacts and enable benefits, a joined-up approach that brings together national and local government and local and foreign companies with the people of the area is needed.
At present, a lack of coordination across ministries, and between national and regional governments is limiting the scope to harness opportunities and manage impacts of investments.
Despite their significance, neither the SEZ and deep-sea ports nor the offshore gas projects serviced from Kyaukphyu are included in Rakhine State’s socioeconomic development plan.
We believe a strategic environmental assessment is needed to enable sustainable development and the fulfilment of human rights in the Kyaukphyu area.
Strategic environmental assessments, which are part of Myanmar law, are defined in the 2015 Environmental Impact Procedure as “a range of analytical and participatory approaches that aim to integrate environment into policies, plans and programs and evaluate the inter-linkages with economic and social considerations.
The principle is to integrate environment, alongside economic and social concerns, into a holistic sustainability assessment.”
Unlike an environmental impact assessment, which is a permitting requirement for individual projects, a strategic environmental assessment takes a holistic approach by integrating environmental and social concerns and human rights protection, to produce a big picture view of the impacts of interrelated projects.
At Kyaukphyu, the national and state governments – drawing on financial and technical assistance from development and human rights partners – could commission expert independent consultants to undertake the necessary studies and analysis to produce such an assessment.
The assessment would consider the cumulative human rights and environmental impacts of the SEZ, seaports, pipelines, offshore gas developments and transport and energy infrastructure, including impacts on traditional fishing and farming livelihoods in Kyaukphyu.
It could address how best to avoid or minimise the physical and economic displacement of residents, and how to reduce the potential for local tensions and conflict associated with expected socioeconomic transformations.
A legal framework – based on international law and standards – for protecting human rights during economic displacement and resettlement needs to be put in place. That’s not just for the SEZs, but for all projects.
While insufficient to address the lack of legal accountability in the SEZ Law and the limited access to justice in Myanmar, a strategic environmental assessment could improve transparency and give voice to the views of local communities, businesses, civil society organisations and other stakeholders.
This would help fill major gaps in planning and decision-making processes thus far.
Consultation is critical to the value and legitimacy of any assessment but too often it is tokenistic or minimised to cut costs and time.
Development partners should ensure that they are funding genuine and extensive public participation.
A lesson from Myanmar’s only other assessment of this kind, currently underway with support from the International Finance Corporation focused on the hydropower sector, has been the need to communicate and engage constantly about the purpose and process of the assessment.
Many civil society groups chose not to participate in consultations for the IFC-backed assessment due to scepticism and lack of confidence in the process.
To learn from this experience, international and local NGOs in Kyaukphyu could share information and support communities to make informed decisions about their engagement with a strategic environmental assessment.
Until there is a concrete and transparent plan to manage impacts from development projects in Kyaukphyu, particularly those with negative impacts on human rights, current preparations for the SEZ should be put on hold.
This includes land acquisition that is underway and risks violating the rights of local residents.
The government should also delay entering into investment agreements with the winning consortium of developers, which is led by China’s CITIC Group, until there has been broader multi-stakeholder debate about the SEZ, and how it may develop and interact with other investments in the area.
A strategic environmental assessment in Kyaukphyu could contribute towards correcting a development process that has so far not contributed meaningfully to the realisation of human rights or addressed the economic needs of the population in Kyaukphyu or Rakhine State.
We hope that the Myanmar government at national and state level as well as development partners will take this forward, building on the advisory commission’s recommendation and its endorsement by the state counsellor.
