Italy: Presidential pardon for rendition a blow to the rule of law, says ICJ
The ICJ today expressed its deep concern at the decision of the President of the Republic of Italy to pardon Colonel Joseph L. Romano III, following his conviction by an Italian court for complicity in the rendition of Osama Moustafa Hassan Nasr, also known as Abu Omar (photo).
“This pardon deals a serious blow to the rule of law and to accountability for CIA renditions and secret detentions, a system which involved torture, enforced disappearances, arbitrary and secret detention and other serious crimes under international law,” said Massimo Frigo, Legal Adviser with the ICJ Europe Programme. “Italy stood honourably as the only country where an effective prosecution had been brought against CIA and Italian agents responsible for crimes under international law committed through the CIA rendition programme. This pardon deletes, in a single stroke of the pen, years of relentless efforts of prosecutors, investigators and lawyers to assure accountability for these crimes under international law.”
The ICJ emphasized that the pardon granted by the Italian President of the Republic, Giorgio Napolitano, in his last weeks of office, defeats the efforts of the judiciary to uphold the State’s international law obligations to investigate, prosecute and bring to justice those responsible for gross violations of human rights.
“By nullifying the effects of years of efforts of the Italian judicial system, this pardon seriously undermines Italy’s action against impunity and weakens the very foundations of the rule of law,” Frigo added. “The fact that the President of the Republic justified this action by raising the “peculiarity of the historical moment” of 9/11, thus suggesting that a kind of state of exception for the rule of law could have existed, is an unacceptable position under international law.”
The ICJ deeply regrets this decision of the President of the Republic to use his prerogative of pardon to prevent accountability for such an egregious violation of the rule of law in name of US-Italian diplomatic relations.
The ICJ condemns this pardon and stresses that it must not constitute a precedent and that other convictions in this case must not be nullified by pardons or amnesties. All European countries must uphold their duty fight against impunity for gross violations of human rights.
Any further circumvention of accountability for perpetrators of renditions or other gross human rights violations would only extend the cloak of impunity over the rule of law in Europe.
Contact:
Massimo Frigo, Legal Adviser, ICJ Europe Programme, massimo.frigo(a)icj.org
PR-Italy-RenditionPardon-2013-eng (english version)
PR-Italy-RenditionPardon-2013-ita (italian version)
Sentenza 10373/2012, Administrative Court of Lazio, Italy (13 December 2012)
Even though same-sex couples are not explicitly recognized in Italy, the surviving partner of a same-sex couple has a right of tenancy. Sentenza 10373/2012, Administrative Court of Lazio, Italy (13 December 2012) (Full text of judgment in English, PDF)Order 15981/12, Supreme Court of Cassation, Italy (20 September 2012)
Procedural Posture Appeal to the Supreme Court of Cassation against the decision of the Court of Appeal denying the claimant’s application for refugee status. Both the Court of First Instance (Tribunale di Trieste) and the Court of Appeal of Trieste had rejected the...
Seminario: espulsione di migranti e richiedenti asilo ed il diritto internazionale
La Commissione Internazionale di Giuristi ed il Consiglio Italiano per i Rifugiati organizzano un seminario per giudici, giudici di pace ed avvocati sui principi di diritto internazionale applicabili all’espulsione o allontanamento dei migranti e richiedenti asilo.
Il seminario sarà suddiviso in due giornate:
La prima giornata (giovedì 20 settembre – 14:30 – 18:30) analizzerà la normativa e la giurisprudenza internazionale sul principio di non-refoulement o di non respingimento, la sua applicazione nella giurisprudenza italiana, assieme ad una prospettiva di diritto comparato con il sistema spagnolo.
La seconda giornata (venerdì 21 settembre – 14:30 – 18:30) analizzerà in maniera più dettagliata la normativa e la giurisprudenza internazionale in materia di rispetto delle misure provvisorie degli organismi internazionali. Tratterà inoltre del loro rispetto in Italia e della sospensione dell’espulsione in casi di non-refoulement attraverso esperti nazionali.
Il semnario è a gratuito ed a numero chiuso (25 persone). Trovate il procedimento d’iscrizione e l’agenda del seminario nei documenti qui sotto.
AnnuncioSeminarioICJCIR-events-20-21settembre-2012-ita (text in PDF)
Agenda seminario-events-agenda-20-21 settembre 2012-ita (text in PDF)
Recent News
South Africa: Constitutional Court’s affirmation that principles of judicial independence are fully applicable to military courts is a welcome step forward09 May 2025
EU: Lawyers and civil society call for mandatory humanitarian clause in anti-smuggling directive09 May 2025
EU: Access to a lawyer in juvenile justice proceedings remains a key concern in several EU Member States07 May 2025- Tunisia: Arbitrarily detained lawyer Ahmed Souab must be released and criminal charges dropped06 May 2025