Bitter Sugar in Dominican Republic: The Sugar Industry and Human Rights (UN side event)

Bitter Sugar in Dominican Republic: The Sugar Industry and Human Rights (UN side event)

The ICJ will host the side event, “Bitter Sugar in Dominican Republic: The Sugar Industry and Human Rights” on Monday, 24 September 2018 from 15:00-16:00, Room XXVII, at the Palais de Nations in Geneva.

Together with tourism, sugar production is one of the major industries and one of the biggest sources of employment in the Dominican Republic.

This small Caribbean State remains one of the world’s top sugar suppliers to the USA.

While sugar production and export in the Dominican Republic is a major source of income for the country, the adverse impacts of its production are various.

Destruction of the environment, reduced access to land for local communities, forced evictions and precarious working conditions in sugarcane plantations are unfortunately a reality in many regions of this Caribbean State.

Whilst the Dominican Republic has shown in past years a preparedness to abide by and implement international standards on matters related to business and human rights, the country continues to face many challenges and evidence of human rights violations on the ground still portrays a complicated reality.

Two recent examples involving the sugar cane industry illustrate ongoing concern about human rights abuses in the Dominican Republic.

In 2016, armed agents of one of the largest sugar producers in the country, Central Romana Corporation, forcibly evicted from their homes more than 60 families during the night.

No alternative accommodation or reparations have been provided to the victims to redress the destruction of their homes and the trauma caused by the violence of the evictions.

In 2017, the Vicini Group, the second main sugar producing company in the country, used the pesticide Glyphosate in such a way that many were in danger of death and that it destroyed the crops of peasant farmers and workers.

To date, the human rights violations in both cases continue to be unpunished.

There is a growing international concern that the sugar cane industry in the Dominican Republic is somehow able to act with impunity when it comes to human rights violations.

Bearing in mind the upcoming Universal Periodic Review of Dominican Republic, in which all UN Member States will examine the human rights situation in the country, this side event is aimed at informing and shedding light on this little known reality in the Dominican Republic as well as to brief State delegations about the importance of addressing this issue in their review of the Dominican Republic.

The event will also provide a space for constructive dialogue among various actors, including the Government of the Dominican Republic.

Panelists:

Carlos Lopez, Senior Legal Adviser, International Commission of Jurists

Fr. Damián Calvo Martin OP, Director, Centro de Teología Santo Domingo de Guzman

–  María Magdalena Álvarez Gálvez, victim of forced evictions by Central Romana Corp.

Moderator: Rory Gogarty, High Court of England and Wales

Interpretation: Will be provided from English to Spanish and Spanish to English

Dominican Republic Sugar Industry Side Event Flyer 24 Sept. (flyer of the event in pdf)

On video: how can the UN respond effectively to crimes under international law in situations of crisis?

On video: how can the UN respond effectively to crimes under international law in situations of crisis?

The ICJ organized this side event today (Tuesday 18 September 2018), in cooperation with the Permanent Mission of the Netherlands, at the Human Rights Council.

https://www.facebook.com/ridhglobal/videos/1005764152964172/

Background

Particularly when crimes under international law are perpetrated on a large scale in situations of crisis, there is an urgent need to preserve evidence for use in eventual criminal proceedings, whether at the International Criminal Court or other national or international tribunals

Too frequently, obstacles prevent immediate direct recourse to international courts and prosecutors. One response has been the creation of mechanisms to collect and preserve the evidence in the meantime. Examples include the International Independent and Impartial Mechanism (IIIM) for Syria, and the Commission on Human Rights in South Sudan.

At the current session of the Human Rights Council, the Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar has called for establishment of an IIIM pending referral to the ICC or an ad hoc tribunal.

Opening Remarks:

Ambassador Monique T.G. van Daalen, Permanent Mission of the Netherlands

Moderator:

Saman Zia-Zarifi, Secretary General, International Commission of Jurists

Panelists:

  • Catherine Marchi-Uhel, Head, International, Impartial and Independent Mechanism (IIIM) for Syria
  • Yasmin Sooka, Chairperson, Commission on Human Rights in South Sudan
  • Sanji Monageng, former Judge/Vice-President of the ICC, and Commissioner of the ICJ
  • Stephen Rapp, Chair, Commission for International Justice & Accountability (CIJA), Distinguished Fellow, US Holocaust Memorial Museum, and former United States Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice
  • Kingsley Abbott, ICJ Senior Legal Adviser (Global Accountability), formerly with the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia and the Special Tribunal for Lebanon

Universal-ICJ-NL-Side event-News-events-2018-ENG (flyer of the event in PDF)

 

Guatemala:  The ICJ welcomes the Constitutional Court order that the CICIG Commissioner Iván Velásquez be permitted to re-enter the country

Guatemala: The ICJ welcomes the Constitutional Court order that the CICIG Commissioner Iván Velásquez be permitted to re-enter the country

On 16 September, the Constitutional Court made public its decision to order that the Commissioner of the International Commission against Impunity (CICIG) Iván Velásquez be permitted to re-enter the country.

For more than a decade, the UN-backed CICIG has helped investigate high-profile officials for corruption.

Under the tenure of head commissioner Ivan Velasquez, the CICIG has helped Guatemalan prosecutors investigate and prosecute many high-level politicians, judges and government officials, including former president Otto Perez Molina and members of his cabinet.

Elected in 2015, current President Jimmy Morales initially supported the CICIG but he himself and other family members have become subjects of investigations into illegal campaign financing. They deny all charges.

President Morales declared on 31 August that he would not renew the mandate of the CICIG which is due to expire in September 2019 and then proceeded to ban Commissioner Velasquez from re-entering the country.

This decision sparked a number of protests including legal challenges in the Constitutional Court.

 “The decision by the Constitutional Court should permit the CICIG to continue its work. It removes one of the greatest obstacles, imposed by order of Guatemalan President Jimmy Morales himself, to the fulfilment of Guatemala’s international obligations, as enshrined in the International Accord on Human Rights which created the Commission,” said Ramon Cadena, ICJ Director for Central America.

With respect to the amparo lawsuits which sought an injunction to reverse the  the decision of the President Morales not to renew the mandate of the CICIG, the Constitutional Court declined to order provisional measures and therefore these legal proceedings will continue until they are determined in court.

“The ICJ urges the Constitutional Court to respect the legal time limits and to make a final decision on the lawsuit, in compliance with international human rights law and standards.

If the mandate of the CICIG were not renewed, it would seriously affect access to justice and constitute a major obstacle to the fulfilment of Guatemala’s international obligation to combat impunity,” Ramon Cadena added.

Guatemala: ICJ and others call on UN High Commissioner Bachelet to act following governments move to shut down International Commission against Impunity

Guatemala: ICJ and others call on UN High Commissioner Bachelet to act following governments move to shut down International Commission against Impunity

On 14 September 2018, the ICJ joined 67 other international and Guatemalan civil society organizations in a letter to the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Michelle Bachelet, to express grave concern about recent developments to curtail anti-impunity efforts in the country.

These include President Jimmy Morales’ decision on 31 August 2018 not to extend the mandate of the International Commission against Impunity in Guatemala (CICIG); the Guatemalan authorities’ subsequent decision on 4 September 2018 to prohibit the re-entry into the country of the CICIG’s Commissioner Iván Velásquez; and judicial reforms adopted by Congress on 6 September 2018 that threaten to undermine the independence of the judiciary and the function of the Constitutional Court judges and the office of the Human Rights Ombudsman.

The signatories welcomed the High Commissioner’s critical reference of these developments in her opening remarks to the 39th session of the Human Rights Council.

They asked that the High Commissioner give continued support in the fight against corruption and impunity in Guatemala and called on her to press the Guatemalan authorities to adopt necessary measures to facilitate compliance with the mandate of the CICIG under the terms of the Agreement signed between Guatemala and the United Nations.

The letter is available here (in Spanish): Guatemala-Letter to Michelle Bachelet-News-2018-SPA

From Documenting Violations to Preparing for Prosecutions: How can the UN respond effectively to crimes under international law in situations of crisis? (UN Side Event)

From Documenting Violations to Preparing for Prosecutions: How can the UN respond effectively to crimes under international law in situations of crisis? (UN Side Event)

The ICJ will organize this side event, in cooperation with the Permanent Mission of the Netherlands, at the Human Rights Council on Tuesday 18 September 2018 from 15:30 – 16.30 in Room XXII of the Palais des Nations.

Particularly when crimes under international law are perpetrated on a large scale in situations of crisis, there is an urgent need to preserve evidence for use in eventual criminal proceedings, whether at the International Criminal Court or other national or international tribunals

Too frequently, obstacles prevent immediate direct recourse to international courts and prosecutors. One response has been the creation of mechanisms to collect and preserve the evidence in the meantime. Examples include the International Independent and Impartial Mechanism (IIIM) for Syria, and the Commission on Human Rights in South Sudan.

At the current session of the Human Rights Council, the Fact-Finding Mission on Myanmar has called for establishment of an IIIM pending referral to the ICC or an ad hoc tribunal.

The various options for accountability, and how to take these and related initiatives forward will be discussed.

Opening Remarks:

Ambassador Monique T.G. van Daalen, Permanent Mission of the Netherlands

Moderator:

Saman Zia-Zarifi, Secretary General, International Commission of Jurists

Panelists:

  • Catherine Marchi-Uhel, Head, International, Impartial and Independent Mechanism (IIIM) for Syria
  • Yasmin Sooka, Chairperson, Commission on Human Rights in South Sudan
  • Sanji Monageng, former Judge/Vice-President of the ICC, and Commissioner of the ICJ
  • Stephen Rapp, Chair, Commission for International Justice & Accountability (CIJA), Distinguished
    Fellow, US Holocaust Memorial Museum, and former United States Ambassador-at-Large for Global Criminal Justice
  • Kingsley Abbott, ICJ Senior Legal Adviser (Global Accountability), formerly with the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia and the Special Tribunal for Lebanon

Universal-ICJ-NL-Side event-News-events-2018-ENG (flyer of the event in PDF)

Translate »