Mar 24, 2016 | News
The ICJ welcomes today’s adoption by the UN Human Rights Council of a resolution on human rights defenders addressing economic, social and cultural rights.Negotiation of the resolution was led by Norway, who presented the draft to the Council with co-sponsorship with a large number of states from around the world.
A series of hostile amendments tabled by the Russian Federation, China, Cuba, Egypt and Pakistan, which would have weakened the resolution, were defeated, and the resolution was ultimately adopted by a large majority.
The ICJ had earlier joined advocacy efforts to support the resolution text as presented, and welcomes the strong message the resolution as adopted sends affirming the importance of defenders’ work on economic, social and cultural rights, as well as the need for states to respect, protect and fulfil the human rights of such defenders, including through a range of legislative, policy, and practical measures.
The draft resolution is available in an unofficial version here: 2016 draft resolution HRDs as orally revised.
The voting on the resolution is available here: Result of the vote HRDs
Mar 23, 2016 | Advocacy, Non-legal submissions
Today, the ICJ made a submission to the Human Rights Council’s Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review in advance of the Human Rights Council’s review of Uganda in October/November 2016.
In its submission, the ICJ expressed concern about the detrimental impact of the adoption and enforcement of the Anti-Homosexuality Act, 2014; the effect of pre-existing and extant criminalization of consensual same-sex sexual conduct; and the introduction of the Prohibition of Promotion of Unnatural Sexual Practices Bill, on the respect for and the protection and realization of human rights in Uganda.
A copy of the submission can be found here:
Uganda-ICJ CESCR submission-Advocacy-non legal submission-2015-ENG (full text in PDF)
Mar 15, 2016 | News
Today’s acquittal of the only person facing charges for the killing of lands rights activist Chai Bunthonglek, highlights the urgent need for the Thai Government to protect human rights defenders in the country, said the ICJ today.
In addition to Chai Bunthonglek, a member of the Southern Peasant Federation of Thailand (SPFT), three other SPFT activists have been killed since 2010: Montha Chukaew and Pranee Boonrat in 2012 and Somporn Pattanaphum in 2010.
No one has been prosecuted for these three killings, reportedly due to insufficient evidence obtained by the police.
“The result in this case underscores the pressing need for the Department of Special Investigations to investigate the pattern of killings of land rights activists in southern Thailand,” said Kingsley Abbott, ICJ International Legal Adviser for Southeast Asia.
Chai Bunthonglek was killed on 11 February 2015. All four SPFT activists killed since 2010 had been advocating for the land rights of poor farmers who are in a dispute with the Government and a palm oil company operated by Jiew Kang Jue Pattana Co. Ltd.
“Today’s acquittal means that no-one has been held accountable for the killing of Chai Bunthonglek, representing another failure to bring to justice those responsible for crimes against human rights defenders and, in particular, those trying to uphold social and economic rights in Thailand,” said Abbott.
“The ICJ calls on the Thai Government to ensure justice and effective remedies for human rights defenders.”
On 15 March, the Viangsra Provincial Court acquitted Santi Wanthong, who was accused of driving the motorcycle from which Chai Bunthonglek, 61-years-old, was shot six times and killed in front of his family in Klong Sai Pattana in Surat Thani Province.
Two other suspects initially arrested for the crime were not indicted.
The DSI has the power to assume jurisdiction over “special” criminal cases including complex cases that require special inquiry, crimes committed by organized criminal groups, and cases where the principal suspect is “an influential person.”
The trial court held today that prosecution witnesses could not properly identify the defendant, and that a cap and gun collected from his house could not be positively identified as belonging to the man who had been involved in attacking Chai Bunthonglek.
Chai Bunthonglek’s family intends to appeal the verdict, the ICJ has been told. They have 30 days to file an appeal.
Witnesses in the case, as well as members of SPFT, have expressed their fear of further attacks. Suraphon Songru, member of the Steering Group of the SPFT, told the ICJ: “the perpetrators – which the community believe may be linked to the local authorities in the area – are still out there, which means another killing could take place.”
The ICJ called on Thai authorities to ensure the safety of all witnesses and ensure the safety of all human rights defenders, including members of SPFT, in Surat Thani.
Background
Santi Wanthong was formally indicted on the following charges: murder of another person (section 288 of the Thai Criminal Code); jointly premeditated murder (section 289 of the Thai Criminal Code); possession of a firearm without a permit (section 371 of the Thai Criminal Code); and possession of ammunition for a firearm without a permit (sections 7, 8 and 72 of the Gun, Ammunition, Explosive Substance, Firework and Artificial Gun Weapon Act).
SPFT was formed in 2008 and campaigns for the right to agricultural land in the Khlong Sai Pattana and Permsub area, in Surat Thani Province and other areas in the region.
Thailand is a state party to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) and had its review before the Committee of the ICESCR in June 2015, where the killings of land rights defenders was particularly noted. The Committee urged Thailand to “adopt all measures necessary to protect human rights activists, including those working to defend economic, social and cultural rights, from any and all acts of intimidation, harassment and killings and to ensure that perpetrators of such acts are brought to justice.” The obligation to protect the right to life and other rights of human rights defenders working on economic, social and cultural rights, and to take effective criminal proceedings in response to such crimes, is also an obligation of Thailand under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and is recognized in numerous UN standards on protection of human rights defenders.
Contact
Kingsley Abbott, International Legal Adviser for Southeast Asia, t +66 94 470 1345 ; e: kingsley.abbott(a)icj.org
Thailand-Chai case-News-2016-THA (full text in Thai, PDF)
Mar 3, 2016 | News
One of the leading indigenous activists and human rights defenders in Honduras, Berta Cáceres had worked jointly with the ICJ on several projects. She was shot dead by unknown attackers at her home today.
The ICJ urges the Honduran authorities to launch a rapid and independent investigation to identify who perpetrated and/or ordered the murder of Berta Cáceres and bring the person(s) responsible into court.
“We have lost a courageous and committed human rights defender,” said Ramón Cadena, ICJ’s Regional Director for Central America.
“It is essential that this crime does not remain unpunished. The government must send a strong signal and take immediately measures to effectively investigate this killing and hold those responsible to account,” he added.
A relentless defender of indigenous peoples rights to land and natural resources, Berta Cáceres had been awarded the Goldmann Environmental Prize in 2015 (photo).
It is a huge loss not only for her family, but also for the whole human rights movement in Honduras, the ICJ said.
Berta Cáceres had received repeated death threats from both state security forces and the company planning the Agua Zarca dam, which she had successfully fought against, together with residents of the Lenca Community.
She had been placed under the protection of the local police in La Esperanza, the area where she lived. Obviously this was not enough.
The situation of human rights defenders in Honduras is dire and has continuously deteriorated in the recent years, with their activities being systematically criminalized.
Mar 1, 2016 | News
En mayo de 2015, la empresa REPSA entregó un oficio en el Ministerio de Ambiente y Recursos Naturales donde acepta su responsabilidad por el desborde de sus lagunas de oxidación artificial que se derramaron sobre las aguas del río La Pasión el 28 de abril de 2015.
Sobre un segundo evento del 6 de junio de 2015 no hubo un reconocimiento de su responsabilidad.
El daño causado al Río la Pasión persiste al día de hoy y ha obligado a varias comunidades que allí habitan a buscar fuentes alternativas de sustento y trabajo.
El 10 de junio de 2015, vecinos del municipio de Sayaxché, en asamblea general integraron la Comisión por la Defensa de la Vida y la Naturaleza, para dar seguimiento por la vía legal a la contaminación del río.
El 11 de junio de 2015 presentaron una denuncia en el Ministerio Público con sede en el Municipio de San Benito, departamento de El Petén y demandaron a la empresa REPSA.
La Jueza Karla Hernández del Juzgado Pluripersonal de Primera Instancia Penal, Narcoactividad y Delitos contra el Ambiente resolvió investigar y suspender las operaciones de la empresa por un período de seis meses.
La decisión de la Jueza provocó diferentes acciones en su contra.
Entre las acciones más evidentes se cuentan: a) Antejuicio presentado en septiembre de 2016 por abogados vinculados a la empresa REPSA, el cual fue declarado sin lugar por la Corte Suprema de Justicia el 9 de diciembre de 2015; b) Demanda de juicio sumario civil para deducción de responsabilidades civiles por “extralimitación de sus facultades como juez B del Juzgado Pluripersonal de Primera Instancia Penal, Narcoactividad y Delitos contra el Ambiente del Municipio de San Benito, Departamento de El Petén, toda vez que ordenó una medida precautoria que no está contemplada en la ley”; esta denuncia fue aceptada para su trámite por la Sala Regional Mixta de la Corte de Apelaciones del Departamento de El Petén, Municipio de Poptún el 6 de octubre de 2015 y se encuentra en trámite.
Acerca de estas acciones, la CIJ considera:
- Según los Principios básicos de las Naciones Unidas relativos a la independencia de la judicatura no se efectuarán intromisiones indebidas o injustificadas en el proceso judicial, ni se someterán a revisión las decisiones judiciales de los tribunales, salvo la vía de la revisión judicial por medio de los recursos legales existentes;
- En el presente caso, la decisión de la jueza Hernández fue recurrida conforme los recursos propios del proceso penal (reposición y apelación); sin embargo, mediante otras acciones, se tomaron medidas en contra de la jueza Hernández y no contra la resolución emitida por ella, como debiera ser.
- Estas acciones atentan contra la independencia judicial, en tanto buscan evitar que la Jueza Hernández conozca el caso;
- La Jueza Hernández ha recibido amenazas sin que el Estado de Guatemala le brinde la protección debida;
Ramón Cadena, Director de la Comisión Internacional de Juristas para Centroamérica expresó: “Urgimos a las autoridades del Sistema de Justicia a tomar medidas adecuadas para evitar que las y los jueces independientes, resulten afectados por este tipo de acciones e intimidaciones.”
