Culminación del período constitucional de la Fiscal General del Ministerio Público, una garantía para el Estado de Derecho en Guatemala

Culminación del período constitucional de la Fiscal General del Ministerio Público, una garantía para el Estado de Derecho en Guatemala

La actual Fiscal General y Jefa del Ministerio Público, Claudia Paz y Paz, fue nombrada el 10 de diciembre de 2010 para dirigir la institución por un período de 4 años, que legalmente vence el 9 de diciembre de 2014.

Su nombramiento ocurrió, hasta dicha fecha, como resultado de la repetición del proceso de selección debido a acusaciones que cuestionaban la honorabilidad e idoneidad de la persona previamente electa.

La actual Fiscal General y Jefa del Ministerio Público se ha constituido por sus resultados de gestión ante el Ministerio Público, como una figura democrática e independiente que ha realizado una importante labor en la protección y defensa de derechos humanos y en el desmantelamiento de estructuras criminales importantes. Esta figura contraviene los intereses de oscuros grupos que buscan interrumpir la continuidad del trabajo de la Fiscal.

Por ello, un abogado, ha puesto en marcha acciones jurídicas promoviendo que la Corte de Constitucionalidad acceda a reducir el período de gestión de la actual Fiscal.

El 05 de febrero del presente año, la Corte de Constitucionalidad emitió una resolución en que concede un amparo provisional y ordena al Congreso de la República convocar a la conformación de un nuevo proceso de elección para cambio de Fiscal General.

De confirmarse este amparo provisional por parte de la Corte de Constitucionalidad, se tendría como resultado que la fiscal sea removida de su cargo y se estaría violentando el Estado de Derecho.

Guatemala-Commuicado en defensa del estado de derecho-news-web story-2014-spa (full text in pdf)

Photo credit: ICTJ

La CIJ évalue la nouvelle constitution tunisienne

La CIJ évalue la nouvelle constitution tunisienne

Dans une prise de position publiée aujourd’hui, la CIJ évalue la conformité des principales dispositions de la nouvelle constitution avec le droit et les normes internationales. 

Le 26 janvier 2014, trois ans après l’éviction du président Ben Ali, l’Assemblée nationale constituante tunisienne a voté pour sa nouvelle constitution.

La CIJ estime que la constitution adoptée est le produit d’un processus représentatif et inclusif.

Néanmoins, à certains égards, la constitution est en deçà du droit international et des normes internationales.

A ce titre, la CIJ recommande aux autorités tunisiennes de prendre en compte les déficiences de la constitution mise en évidence dans ce document.

Tunisia-Evalusation Nouvelle Constitution-Advocacy-Position Paper 2014-Fr (Texte complet en PDF)

Nauru: removal of judges violates independence of judiciary

Nauru: removal of judges violates independence of judiciary

The ICJ is deeply concerned by reports that the President of Nauru has prevented the island nation’s Chief Justice from returning to the country and expelled the sole Resident Magistrate in violation of international standards on the independence of the judiciary.

According to media reports, Nauru President Baron Waqa on January 19 removed Resident Magistrate Peter Law in violation of an injunction issued by Chief Justice Geoffrey Eames. Subsequently, Chief Justice Eames, who was in Australia at the time, had his visa cancelled. Both judicial officials are Australian citizens.

Australia administered Nauru as a dependent territory until 1968 and the two countries retain strong bilateral relations. Australian judges and magistrates often serve on Nauru Courts.

“Removing judges from office, without any process whatsoever, breaches clear international standards on the independence of the judiciary,” said Sam Zarifi, ICJ’s Regional Director for Asia and the Pacific. “It also jeopardizes the right of people in Nauru, especially those currently engaged in legal proceedings, to have a fair trial.”

Nauru is an island state in Micronesia in the South Pacific.

The ICJ’s Centre for the Independence of Judges and Lawyers (CIJL) is monitoring developments.

Contact: 

Sam Zarifi, ICJ Asia-Pacific Regional Director, (Bangkok), t:+66 807819002,  e-mail: sam.zarifi(a)icj.org

Craig Knowles, ICJ Media & Communications, (Bangkok), t:+66 819077653, e-mail: craig.knowles(a)icj.org

Judges, lawyers and prosecutors guide now available in Chinese

Judges, lawyers and prosecutors guide now available in Chinese

The ICJ has now published a translation of its Practitioner’s Guide, International Principles on the Independence and Accountability of Judges, Lawyers and Prosecutors in both traditional and simplified Chinese.

This is the first comprehensive analysis of the existing standards and compilation of universal and regional instruments published in Chinese.

The Guide outlines the roles to be played by a strong legal profession, an independent  judiciary and an impartial and objective prosecuting authority.

References to international decisions, reports, texts of treaties and other international standards allow the Guide to be used as a reference book by legal practitioners and policy makers.

To access and download it please click here.

Kazakhstan: ICJ welcomes the Supreme Court decision to grant an appeal of a disbarred lawyer

Kazakhstan: ICJ welcomes the Supreme Court decision to grant an appeal of a disbarred lawyer

On 6 December, the ICJ concluded a trial observation mission to Kazakhstan on the case of the disbarment of lawyer Polina Zhukova.

Lawyers Lyubov Agushevich and Polina Zhukova were disbarred following disciplinary proceedings initiated by the Ministry of Justice regarding their defence of a client in court proceedings.

The alleged misconduct, which lead to the disbarment of the lawyers, included inter alia a statement of innocence of their client, submitting motions to the court, submitting requests for recusals, one lawyer “putting a question which she knew the answer to”, reading a page out of the case file, and filing a motion for an examination of the witnesses who attended the hearing.

These actions were interpreted by the presiding judge in the criminal case in which the lawyers represented the defendant as violations of professional ethics, and were later used as grounds for the termination of their licenses to practice law.

ICJ observers, Justice Ketil Lund, an ICJ Commissioner and a former Justice of the Supreme Court of Norway, and Zulfikor Zamonov, a lawyer from Tajikistan, observed the Supreme Court appeal hearing in the case on 5 December.

The Supreme Court upheld the motion of lawyer Zhukova to resume proceedings in her case and reconsider the issue of the lawfulness of her disbarment.

“The ICJ welcomes the decision to review the case against the lawyer and will continue following the case,” said Temur Shakirov, Legal Adviser of the ICJ Europe Programme.

Read also:

Disbarment proceedings against lawyers in Kazakhstan

Disciplinary action against lawyers in CIS countries: analysis of international law and standards

Contact:

Róisín Pillay, Director, ICJ Europe Programme, roisin.pillay(a)icj.org

Temur Shakirov, LegalAdviser, ICJ Europe Programme, temur.shakirov(a)icj.org

Translate »