The Court stated that a prolongation of a parents and their child’s stay in a guarded centre for foreigners was not warranted as the lengthening of the asylum procedure was not of their doing. The court moreover referred itself to the best interest of the child. The Court did not examine extensively enough alternative measures to detention.
Source: PDF file with the case
The Court did not examine extensively enough alternative measures to detention, and did not consider carefully enough if a stay in a guarded centre for foreigners was appropriate for the parent’s two children.
Source: PDF file with the case
The Court did not examine extensively enough alternative measures to detention, and did not consider carefully enough if a stay in a guarded centre for foreigners was appropriate for a child.
Source: PDF file with the case
The Court did not examine extensively enough alternative measures to detention, and did not consider carefully enough if a stay in a guarded centre for foreigners was appropriate for a child.
Source: PDF file with the case
The Court did not examine extensively enough alternative measures to detention, and did not consider carefully enough if a stay in a guarded centre for foreigners was appropriate for the parent’s two young children.
Source: PDF file with the case
The Court did not examine extensively enough alternative measures to detention, and did not consider carefully enough if a stay in a guarded centre for foreigners was appropriate for the parent’s two young children.
Source: PDF file with the case
