Aug 17, 2020 | Incidencia
La CIJ y 83 organizaciones de derechos humanos le piden al Consejo de Derechos Humanos de las Naciones Unidas renovar y fortalecer el mandato de la Misión Internacional Independiente de Investigación de los Hechos sobre Venezuela en el próximo periodo de sesiones. También, le piden asegurar recursos adecuados para que la Misión continué su importante trabajo.
La falta de independencia judicial en el país, recientemente analizada por la Alta Comisionada de Derechos Humanos y documentada por la CIJ durante varios años, representa un obstáculo para que las víctimas de graves violaciones de derechos humanos accedan a recursos y reparaciones efectivas. Además, ha habido casi total impunidad para los responsables de dichas violaciones. Así, la falta de una efectiva rendición de cuentas hace que el trabajo de la Misión Internacional sea indispensable.
El año pasado, en su periodo de sesiones No. 42, el Consejo de Derechos Humanos de las Naciones Unidas estableció la Misión Internacional Independiente de Investigación de los Hechos para Venezuela, con el mandato de investigar ejecuciones extrajudiciales, desapariciones forzadas, detenciones arbitrarias y torturas u otras formas de trato cruel inhumano o degradante desde 2014.
El Consejo expresó “gran preocupación por la alarmante situación de los derechos humanos en la República Bolivariana de Venezuela, en la que se repiten sistemáticamente violaciones que afectan de forma directa e indirecta a todos los derechos humanos (…) en el contexto de la actual crisis política, económica, social y humanitaria.”
El Primer informe de la Misión Internacional se presentará en la próxima sesión del Consejo, programada para el 14 de septiembre al 6 de octubre de 2020.
El comunicado conjunto suscrito por 85 organizaciones dice que el informe “marcará un importante primer paso en la senda de la rendición de cuentas en Venezuela mediante la documentación de la participación de aquellas personas de las que se sospecha que son penalmente responsables. Es fundamental que el Consejo de Derechos Humanos responda de manera significativa a las conclusiones y recomendaciones del informe”.
Por otro lado, la CIJ observa que la pandemia de la COVID-19 ha generado mayor tensión sobre la situación de derechos humanos en Venezuela. Así, la Oficina de Naciones Unidas para Coordinación de Asuntos Humanitarios (OCHA por sus siglas en inglés) informó en Julio de 2020 que “[u]na evaluación de las condiciones de agua, saneamiento e higiene en 17 hospitales realizada por la OPS/OMS en 2019 reporta que el 88,3% de los hospitales evaluados tienen un riesgo alto que las condiciones higiénico-sanitarias contribuyan al agravamiento del estado de salud de sus usuarios; el resto tienen un riesgo medio.”
El comunicado conjunto se encuentra disponible en español aquí.
Aug 17, 2020 | Advocacy, News
Today, the ICJ joined 83 other human rights organizations to call the United Nations Human Rights Council to renew and strengthen the mandate of the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission (FFM) on Venezuela in its upcoming session in September, and to ensure it has adequate resources to continue its critical work.
The ICJ considers that the lack of judicial independence in the country, recently addressed by the High Commissioner and documented by ICJ during several years, presents a major obstacle to victims seeking to access effective remedies and reparation for gross human rights violations in the country. There has also been near complete impunity for those responsible for such violations. The lack of effective accountability makes the work of the FFM indispensable
Last year at its 42nd session, UN Human Rights Council established the Independent International Fact-Finding Mission with a mandate to investigate extrajudicial executions, enforced disappearances, arbitrary detentions and torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment since 2014.
The Council expressed “grave concern at the alarming situation of human rights in the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, which includes patterns of violations directly and indirectly affecting all human rights (…) in the context of the ongoing political, economic, social and humanitarian crisis.”
The FFM’s first report is expected to be presented at the Council’s next session scheduled for 14 September to 6 October.
The NGO joint statement stressed that the report “will mark an important first step on the path to accountability in Venezuela through the documentation of the participation of those suspected of criminal responsibility. It is critical that the Human Rights Council respond meaningfully to the findings and recommendations in the report”.
The ICJ notes that the COVID-19 pandemic has engendered further stresses on the human rights situation. The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) reported in July 2020 that an “assessment of water, hygiene and sanitation (WASH) conditions in 17 hospitals conducted by PAHO/WHO in 2019 found that 88.3 per cent of the assessed hospitals present a high risk that hygiene and sanitary conditions pose a health risk to patients and staff; the rest face a medium risk.”
The joint statement is available here.
Aug 14, 2020 | Новости
Сегодня МКЮ опубликовала, в переводе на русский язык, сборник дел, рассмотренных Комитетом ООН по правам человека (КПЧ) в связи с жалобами на пытки и иные виды жестокого обращения.
В сборнике представлены соображения КПЧ по всем индивидуальным сообщениям по статьям 7 и 10 МПГПП, рассмотренным по существу в отношении Республики Таджикистан с 1999 по 2019 год.
Сборник представляет собой справочное пособие для адвокатов, судей, представителей гражданского общества и других заинтересованных сторон, работающих над защитой от пыток и жестокого обращения в Таджикистане. Представленные дела показывают, как Комитет ООН по правам человека применяет принципы своей практики в отношении пыток и других видов жестокого обращения в конкретном правовом и фактическом контексте Таджикистана. Авторитетное толкование МПГПП со стороны Комитета может помочь при рассмотрении этих вопросов в национальных судах, а также в ходе законодательной реформы и при разработке государственной политики по вопросам борьбы с пытками.
Кроме того, благодаря подборке и анализу фактических обстоятельств индивидуальных обращений из Таджикистана, сборник также служит выявлению основных системных проблем, которые представляют сложность для таджикских правоохранительных органов и национальной системы правосудия. Сборник открывается введением, в котором освещаются основные проблемы, выявленные Комитетом почти за 20 лет рассмотрения дел из Таджикистана. В решениях Комитета можно проследить несколько закономерностей относительно фактического функционирования системы уголовного правосудия Таджикистана. Взятые в совокупности, данные решения представляют собой важный источник фактологических данных, при помощи которых можно установить, где система правосудия на практике не в состоянии защитить права человека, гарантированные МПГПП, а часто – и законодательством и процедурами Таджикистана.
Хотя свобода от пыток и других жестоких, бесчеловечных или унижающих достоинство видов обращения и наказания по статье 7 является основной темой публикации, она логически включает ссылки и на другие статьи МПГПП, включая статью 2(3) (право на эффективное средство правовой защиты от нарушения прав, закрепленных в Пакте), статью 6 (право на жизнь), статью 10 (условия содержания под стражей), статью 9 (право на свободу) и статью 14 (право на справедливое судебное разбирательство). Эти права анализируются только в том случае, если заявители ссылаются на них по делам, связанным с жалобами на нарушение прав, предусмотренных статьями 7 или 10 МПГПП.
Настоящий сборник дел публикуется в рамках Глобальной инициативы МКЮ по восстановлению прав и подотчетности, с тем чтобы сделать доступными дела Комитета по правам человека, связанные с пытками и другими видами жестокого обращения, широкому кругу работников системы правосудия и взаимодействующих с ней лиц. Он будет полезен как независимым практикам, таким как адвокаты, правозащитники и организации гражданского общества, так и судебным органам, а также Министерству юстиции, Министерству здравоохранения и Министерству внутренних дел, к компетенции которых могут относиться некоторые из рассматриваемых вопросов. Публикация может представлять не меньший интерес для МПО, работающих в Таджикистане или заинтересованных в такой работе.
Aug 13, 2020 | Advocacy, News
Today, the ICJ and 64 civil society organizations jointly called on the Royal Government of Cambodia (“RGC”) to discard the draft Law on Public Order (“draft law”) which, if adopted, would breach Cambodia’s international legal obligations.
The draft law aims to regulate public spaces and public behavior within those spaces, covering aesthetics, sanitation, cleanliness, noise, and social values, all under the broad aim of maintaining “public order”. It sets out a number of specific activities that are prohibited, lists a range of penalties that may be imposed for violations, and grants unfettered enforcement powers to authorities across all levels of government, with the proclaimed objective of creating “a more civilized society”.
The organizations expressed concern that the draft law contains multiple overbroad and arbitrary provisions which violate numerous human rights protections enshrined in the Constitution of the Kingdom of Cambodia and human rights treaties to which Cambodia is party, including the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
Amidst an ongoing crackdown on fundamental freedoms in Cambodia, a number of existing laws already grant overbroad and unfettered powers to the RGC and are regularly deployed abusively to undermine human rights. Adoption of this draft Law on Public Order would serve to facilitate a further deterioration of the human rights situation in Cambodia.
The joint statement is available in English here.
The joint statement is available in Khmer here.
Contact
Kingsley Abbott, Senior Legal Adviser, ICJ Global Accountability Initiative e: kingsley.abbott(a)icj.org
See also
ICJ, ‘ICJ and 31 organizations jointly urge Governments to call for respect of human rights in Cambodia’, 22 July 2020
ICJ, ‘Cambodia: State of Emergency bill violates the rule of law’, 8 April 2020
ICJ, ‘Misuse of law will do long-term damage to Cambodia’, 26 July 2018
ICJ report, ‘Achieving Justice for Gross Human Rights Violations in Cambodia: Baseline Study’, October 2017
Aug 11, 2020 | News
The ICJ is concerned at reports that on 8 and 9 August, Lebanese security forces, including Internal Security Force (ISF) units, parliamentary police and the army, employed excessive and unlawful force against hundreds of protestors, resulting in the injury of more than 700 people and dozens of hospitalizations.
The ICJ called on the Lebanese authorities to protect the rights to freedom of peaceful assembly and expression and refrain from using excessive and unlawful force against protestors demanding justice for the 4 August explosions in Beirut’s port district.
The explosions devastated the city’s infrastructure and resulted in the death, injury and internal displacement of large numbers of its inhabitants.
The ICJ stressed that credible allegations of excessive and unlawful use of force in the context of the protests must be promptly, thoroughly and impartially investigated and those responsible must be held to account.
According to information available to the ICJ, at least 14 journalists and media personnel covering the protests were among the wounded.
According to reports, a policeman also died after falling down an elevator shaft while being chased by protesters. While there were reports that some demonstrators threw rocks and firecrackers at security forces, reports also indicate that the security forces’ response was indiscriminate and, in some instances, excessive.
“Many protestors in Lebanon continue to be met with excessive and unlawful force by security agencies, telling the same grim story of how the Lebanese authorities habitually respond to unwelcome political expression and the grievances of the Lebanese public,” said Kate Vigneswaran, the ICJ’s Middle East and North Africa Programme Senior Legal Adviser.
“The people of Beirut have the right to peacefully express their outrage, at alleged official malfeasance that apparently contributed to last week’s tragic devastation, and to expect security forces will comply with the law,” she added.
Information from ICJ interviews with three protestors, and substantiated by reports by multiple media and news agencies, reveal that security forces fired large quantities of tear gas, in addition to rubber bullets, at protestors in several locations in central Beirut, including a gathering of at least 10,000 people including children at Martyr’s Square and those who occupied Parliamentary and ministerial buildings.
Reports also indicate that live ammunition was fired by security forces during the protests, namely birdshot.
A protestor interviewed by the ICJ stated that he was shot in the arm by a rubber bullet and in the leg by a pellet gun, the latter lodging shrapnel into various parts of his body.
Social media reports reveal that some protestors were shot in the face and eyes with rubber bullets. The ISF has denied using rubber bullets.
According to another protestor, government loyalists attacked her in the presence of ISF officers and the army as she filmed scenes outside the American University Hospital, threatening her with violence and by breaking her mobile phone.
Similar reports of security forces indiscriminately beating and harassing protesters have surfaced on social media platforms.
International law, governing the use of force by law enforcement officers, which is binding on Lebanon, mandates that force is only permissible as a last resort for the sole purpose of protecting life or preventing serious injury from an imminent threat, if strictly necessary and only to the extent necessary for the performance of their duty.
All use of force must be discriminate and proportionate to the threat of harm.
The ICJ has called for a prompt, transparent, independent and impartial investigation into the 4 August explosions by a special, independent mechanism, given the documented lack of independence in certain parts of the Lebanese judiciary, which was echoed by other human rights organizations and members of the international community.
Lebanon’s President dismissed the call as “a waste of time” and instead urged the Lebanese judiciary to act swiftly to probe the incident.
Prime Minister Hassan Diab announced his cabinet’s resignation on Monday following widespread calls for the political establishment to resign from their posts following the explosion. Nine members of Parliament, two government Ministers and the Lebanese Ambassador to Jordan had also resigned from their posts over the weekend.
“The explosions were devastating for the people of Beirut, resulting not only in the loss of life and massive injuries, but severe curtailment of their rights to housing and health and their other socio-economic rights,” said Vigneswaran.
“Based on the response of the Lebanese authorities thus far, and given their poor track record in pursuing and realizing accountability, it is clear that there is an urgent need for a proper accountability mechanism to investigate the explosions and respond to victims’ demands and calls for justice. A change in government is not enough,” she added.
Contact
Kate Vigneswaran, Senior Legal Adviser, ICJ Middle East and North Africa Programme, t: +31-62-489-4664; e: kate.vigneswaran(a)icj.org
Download
Full story with additional information: Lebanon-Protests-News-Press releases-2020-ENG
Arabic version: Lebanon-Protests-News-Press releases-2020-ARA
Photo Credit: Aya Nehme
