ICJ and others joint intervention in A.T. v. Sweden
Today, the ICJ and other rights groups presented joint written submissions to the European Court of Human Rights in the case of A.T. v. Sweden (Application No. 78701/14).
Uganda: ICJ submission to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
Today, the ICJ made a submission to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in advance of Committee’s examination of Uganda’s initial periodic report under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
In its submission, the organization drew the Committee’s attention to:
a) the detrimental impact of the adoption and enforcement of the Anti- Homosexuality Act, 2014;
b) the effect of pre-existing and extant criminalization of consensual same-sex sexual conduct; and
c) the introduction of the Prohibition of Promotion of Unnatural Sexual Practices Bill, on the respect for and the protection and realization of certain Covenant rights.
The ICJ considers that those laws violate – or would violate if adopted in the case of the above-mentioned Bill – the following Covenant rights of Uganda’s population generally, and in particular of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender persons in the country:
a) the principle of non-discrimination;
b) the right to work and to just and favourable conditions of work;
c) the right to an adequate standard of living, including adequate housing;
d) the right to the enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health; and
e) the right to education.
Each section features a number of recommendations.
Uganda-ICJ CESCR submission-Advocacy-non legal submission-2015-ENG (full text in PDF)
Thailand: ICJ submission to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
Today, the ICJ made a submission to the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in advance of the examination of Thailand’s initial and second periodic reports under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
The submission provides the Committee with information about certain obstacles that undermine the implementation of the Covenant.
First, the ICJ highlights the obstacles to the enjoyment of the rights guaranteed by the Covenant that have arisen as a result of the new legal and institutional framework since the Thai military implemented Martial Law nationwide on 20 May 2014 and staged a military coup on 22 May 2014.
The submission further describes barriers faced by women to their enjoyment of their rights under the Covenant on the basis of equality and freedom from discrimination.
The submission concludes with a number of recommendations.
Thailand-ICJ CESCR submission-Advocacy-non legal submission-2015-ENG (full text in English)
Ireland: ICJ sumission to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
Today, the ICJ and the Center for Reproductive Rights made a submission to the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in view of its examination of Ireland’s Third Periodic Report.
The submission highlights concerns regarding Ireland’s compliance with its obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as a result of its highly restrictive legislative framework on abortion.
The Center and the ICJ consider that Ireland’s laws on abortion undermine women’s enjoyment of a number of rights under the ICESCR, and in particular the right to the highest attainable standard of health.
The submission briefly describes the current regulation of abortion in Ireland. It then summarizes the way in which previous treaty monitoring bodies’ conclusions and recommendations have addressed women’s access to safe and legal abortion, including specifically in Ireland.
The submission concludes with a number of number of recommendations.
Ireland-ICJ CESCR submission-Advocacy-non legal submission-2015-ENG (full text in PDF)
Perú: peritaje de la CIJ ante la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos en el caso de la “Operación Chavín de Huántar”
En febrero de 2014, el Representante para Suramérica de la CIJ rindió un dictamen pericial en audiencia pública ante la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, en el Caso Cruz Sánchez y otros Vs. Perú.
Este caso está referido a la ejecución extrajudicial de tres miembros del grupo armado “Movimiento Revolucionario Túpac Amaru – MRTA”, luego de ser puestos fuera de combate, por las fuerzas de seguridad peruanas en el marco de la llamada “Operación Chavín de Huántar”, de retoma de la Embajada del Japón en Lima (Diciembre 1996 –abril 1997).
El dictamen pericial rendido por la CIJ abordó cuestiones relativas a: i) la naturaleza jurídica de graves infracciones al derecho internacional humanitario; ii) la intervención de la justicia militar en la investigación y juzgamiento de delitos que no son de función y que pueden constituir violaciones a los derechos humanos; y iii) los estándares internacionales relativos a la debida diligencia en la investigación, juzgamiento y sanción de los responsables de violaciones de derechos humanos.
El pasado 17 de abril de 2015, la Corte Interamericana profirió Sentencia en el caso.
Peru-PeritajeFAGChavinHuantar-Advocacy-legal submission-2015-SPA (texto íntegro en PDF)
Recent News
Tunisia: End sham prosecution of Truth Commission’s former president Sihem Bensedrine24 Jun 2026
HRC62: ICJ calls for an end to abusive migration externalization practices in Libya and Tunisia22 Jun 2026
EU: Gaps and good practices in safeguarding children’s rights in criminal proceedings22 Jun 2026
South Africa must act urgently against xenophobia and violence to prevent further harm22 Jun 2026